User talk:Rhododendrites

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Contents

a heads up[edit]

You wrote, "We have a dedicated "author" field that looks to have been properly filled out."

With regard to the reliability of the author field... I did a google search for images associated with WMF contributor Rhododendrites, re-used by people outside of the WMF. A quick glance didn't show any obvious instances where Rhododendrites was credited for images you had merely uploaded.

My experience is different. A similar google search for images credited to me shows lots of good faith re-users, who want to comply with their obligation to properly credit the images they re-use, get it wrong. A considerable fraction of the time people re-use images I merely uploaded, that were taken by someone else, they credit me, not the actual photographer.

I've called for a redesign of how we present images to our readers. Even putting the content of the author field in a larger font, or in bold, would make a big difference. Geo Swan (talk) 21:47, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

@Geo Swan: Thanks for the note. The point I wanted to make at Anna Frodesiak's page is just that I don't think the wording of a user category is very consequential in this regard. When an external site gets it wrong, it's almost certainly because they looked at the uploader field at the bottom of the page, not that they turned on hidden categories and looked at the little text there. Ultimately, they were just lazy, and it's hard to account for that. :) Maybe there's something to be said for your proposed strategies (e.g. making the font bigger). Or maybe a big "use this media" button, that copies the information to the user's clipboard or something.
On the google search tangent, I had to scroll pretty far down before finding something that I uploaded but didn't create being credited to me: this one (File:Zazel3 edited.jpg) despite the wording of my usercats. :) — Rhododendrites talk |  15:19, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Oh dear. I found several including this one. There must be many more. Rhododendrites, thanks for sticking up for me, but I think Geo Swan makes a good point. I'm so sorry for all of this. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:23, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
@Anna Frodesiak: I'm sticking to my story. :) I cannot imagine a usercat is to blame, but the point is nonetheless well taken. — Rhododendrites talk |  00:26, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
Fair enough. But are there cases with Category:Files uploaded by Mary Jane, Source:Bob Tographer and the image gives credit to Mary Jane? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:32, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
Oh, by the way, Google is blocked here in China. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:35, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
Couldn't say, re: Mary and Bob. I think for that to be likely you would need an improperly formatted usercat (not hidden), and for someone's eyes to slip to the bottom of the screen past all of the more obvious content. Not saying it's impossible, though, and I agree it's better to name them properly.
Out of curiosity, what's your preferred image search engine? I don't think I've used anything other than here, Flickr, and Google. — Rhododendrites talk |  00:42, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
Understood about your first point. About your second: Bing images and Yahoo images. Terrible, I know, but no choice. I do miss Google. By the way, Flickr is blocked here to. :( Anna Frodesiak (talk) 01:02, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
  • Thanks for the reply Rhododendrites, I am going to strongly disagree with your comment "When an external site gets it wrong, it's almost certainly because they looked at the uploader field at the bottom of the page..."
When end users make the same mistake, over and over again, the person to blame, is not the end user, but the team who designed the original interface, and didn't fix it, when repeated mistakes indicated its design flaws caused it to be a regular trigger for end user errors.
Surely it would be trivial to render the contents of the author field in bold? In a font twice as large as the uploader field?
Are you familiar with the long-running RISKS digest? I've been reading it for over thirty years. This is an issue the experts who comment there return to, again and again. The Airbus 320 is a good example. It was the first airliner designed with "fly-by-wire" control system -- like a high-performance jet fighter. Old-fashioned planes, even the 747, have a mechanical connection between the pilot's control stick, pedals, and the planes control surfaces, the flasp, rudder, etc.
The Airbus 320's controls were connected solely to a flight control computer system. The computer system interprets the pilot's use of the traditioal controls, and decides how to move the plane's control surfaces. It can over-ride the pilot's intent. It can basically outsmart the pilot.
Hubris.
First, the designers did not understand the full complexity of the skills an experienced pilot can bring to piloting, Second, they didn't fully take into account the human factors issues in their design.
Guess what? The Airbus wasn't safer than airliners piloted in the traditional fashion. There was great pressure on crash investigators to blame the pilot -- not the interface.
The Airbus interface had a complex suite of audible warnings. During some emergencies a dozen audible warnings would sound -- often with none of them having to do with actual trigger to the emergency. After the crash Airbus would say (paraphrasing) "Clear pilot error! Why the pilot should have realized that the ABC warning was a clue that the DEF system had failed. A dozen warnings are distracting, when eleven of them are largely or entirely irrelevant.
We have something similar here. While the uploader's name is in the same font as the author field, from a human factors point of view, it is much more prominent. The author field is surrounded by text a potential re-user probably isn't paying attention to, in the middle of a very long page. The uploader field is not surrounded by as much distracting text, and it is right at the end pf the page. Like movie credits, the very beginning is the most prominent place, and the end is the second most prominent place. That is why when a movie has a really well known star, in a cameo, or smaller role, than the lead actors, the credits will list the lead, followed by the ordinary supporting actors, and, at the end, it will say "with Marlon Brando". Actor's agents fight tooth and nail for whom gets listed in the second most prominent spot, but we give it to the uploader -- not the author.
So, when our end users make the mistake of crediting the uploader, the fault lies with our design. Sorry, I think there is really no two ways about this. Geo Swan (talk) 18:53, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
@Geo Swan: I don't disagree with you. :) It sounds like a good idea to restyle the page to make it clearer. The only point I wanted to make through al of this is about the likelihood of the usercat to cause misattribution (that it's very unlikely, but more likely that it's because someone looked at the uploader field). Fine to reframe the discussion to say it's not the user's fault at all, but this started with a usercat issue, not a redesign issue. :) Do ping me if you propose a redesign and I would likely support. — Rhododendrites talk |  03:19, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Manhattan at night south of Rockefeller Center (11239).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Manhattan at night south of Rockefeller Center (11239).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Roundel with Sorgheloos with Easy Fortune (11158).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Roundel with Sorgheloos with Easy Fortune (11158).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Manhattan at night north of Rockefeller Center (11226).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Manhattan at night north of Rockefeller Center (11226).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

Monarch butterfly (70387).jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Monarch butterfly (70387).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Monarch butterfly (70387).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

Ebola Virus - Electron Micrograph.tiff
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Ebola Virus - Electron Micrograph.tiff, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ebola Virus - Electron Micrograph.tiff has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 13:05, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you[edit]

Barnstar-camera.png The Photographer's Barnstar
Wow! Wow! Wow! Your images are absolutely amazing! Thank you so much for this fantastic contribution to the project! :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:19, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
@Anna Frodesiak: Thanks! But I don't know if I deserve it. :) If you're going by the FP promotions above, three of the most impressive (the tornado, eclipse, and ebola images) aren't mine. I was on the jury of the Wiki Science Competition in the US, and nominated a few of my favorites uploaded for that competition. — Rhododendrites talk |  00:45, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
You deserve it. I'm referring to your lovely butterflies and cityscapes and all those others. They are great! Anna Frodesiak (talk) 01:05, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
That's very nice. Thank you. :) — Rhododendrites talk |  01:45, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Contest Blue January Voting[edit]

Salud Rhododendrites, not sure if you can work and support with this issue. I added this in comment, but have "delete entry" --->

Hello, I miss some entries at "2018 - January - Blue/Voting" and I see double entries. I submitted "File:Hotel Pyramide 001 (Fürth).jpg" this is a missing image, from me. Doublettes areː 106. Twilight in Goa Late evening on the Mandovi, Goa 109. Kochi Harbour Bolgatty Palace as seen from Marine drive, Kochi " Sorry for asking, but I don´t know someone else ;-)Regards, Hans-Jürgen Neubert

@Hans-Jürgen Neubert: Hello. I looked into your missing image. It looks like it was removed because the contest is only open to images uploaded during the month of January. File:Hotel Pyramide 001 (Fürth).jpg was uploaded in December, so would not be eligible, sorry to say. As for the duplicates, I will ping Jarekt as I am not sure the best way to remove them. He may know better. — Rhododendrites talk |  06:50, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
ː@Rhododendrites: Hello, Rhododendrites. Thanks for your supportǃ Bad thing with upöoad-Time, something new for me. We will see what Jarekt can correct. Nice WE, Hans-Jürgen
sorry about the discualification of the image. Software processing those pages rejects images outside of upload window. We should craft some message to notify photographers, but there are always many images rejected in each challenge. I will fix the duplicates Jarekt (talk) 16:47, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Painted lady (70421).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Painted lady (70421).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Queensboro Bridge from the south (41939).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Queensboro Bridge from the south (41939).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Roaring Fork River in Aspen (91197)a.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Roaring Fork River in Aspen (91197)a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Roosevelt Island Bridge from the south (41860).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Roosevelt Island Bridge from the south (41860).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Snowy egret (12030).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Snowy egret (12030).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Snowy egret (12049).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Snowy egret (12049).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Snowy egret (12033).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Snowy egret (12033).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Oak apple (01845).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Oak apple (01845).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Turkey vultures (01731).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Turkey vultures (01731).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Turkey vultures (01736).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Turkey vultures (01736).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Bothe-Napa Valley State Park (01867).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bothe-Napa Valley State Park (01867).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Adventure Playground (11997).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Adventure Playground (11997).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Great horned owl at ACES (11799).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Great horned owl at ACES (11799).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Manhattan at night south of Rockefeller Center (11215)a.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Manhattan at night south of Rockefeller Center (11215)a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Turkey vultures (01725).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Turkey vultures (01725).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

FPC dahlia[edit]

Sorry if I got your hopes up too much. The photo is very good for QI but just short of FP. I've also noticed, sometimes to my dismay, that I've become increasingly picky at FPC. :-( Becoming more seasoned is good when writing articles, but I'm not sure if losing that sense of wonder for beautiful photos because of some small thing is progress. --cart-Talk 09:19, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

While walking down memory lane with your photos, I gave two of my favorites some TLC. (File:Xiangqi in Sara D. Roosevelt Park (00185).jpg & File:Golden eagle at ACES (11738).jpg) Please revert if you don't like it and tell me to mind my own business. IMO they are now good to go for FPC. I will nominate them later if you don't beat me to it. Right now I'm on a "one of mine and one by someone else" run. ;) --cart-Talk 16:39, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
@W.carter: to the first point: nothing to be sorry for. Took a shot; didn't work out. :) Feedback is useful regardless of whether it's for the purpose of FPC.
To the second, that's very interesting. I do remember you commenting on the xiangqi pic. As usual, though I do like both, neither of these are the sort that I would've thought to send to FPC. Figured not every person being in focus in the first and the bird partially covering her face in the second might be practically disqualifying. We shall see. :) Thanks. — Rhododendrites talk |  22:00, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
While you may not know it, you are one of the few people here who take good photos of events and people in their daily lives. That is actually your strength and perhaps you should focus more on that for good shots rather than flowers. There are so many of us snapping flowers but very few who go out and photograph events like you do. Given that you have easy access to NY, you are also more likely than most to get really interesting documentary photos. Like these: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6], a fixed-up version of this [7] would be wonderful, as would this [8]. Most of these may not be slam-dunk FPs, but the "eye" behind them can certainly deliver. Keep shootin'! Face-smile.svg --cart-Talk 22:29, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

User:Stephencdickson's collages[edit]

Looks like this thread got autoarchived after a week with no responses. What's the best thing to do from here? Restarting the conversation at the Copyright Pump? --Lord Belbury (talk) 09:12, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

@Lord Belbury: Not sure what the best route would be. I did post to that thread after it had largely died down. I also happened across another user's page which had similar images displayed: File:Zoe Lund.jpg, File:Miranda Kerr drawing.jpg, and File:Malcolm X drawing.png are clear copies of (and do not even provide attribution to) this, this, and this, respectively. Worth bringing back to VP, or just to DR? I hate to nominate people's hard work like this, but these seem pretty egregious. — Rhododendrites talk |  23:54, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
I wouldn't want to put them up for deletion without seeing the "specific requests from other wikimedia/wikipedia authors and senior editors to use the technique" that the user was telling us about, in case we're all missing something, but I assume there must have been some kind of misunderstanding here. I'll raise it on the copyright pump. --Lord Belbury (talk) 09:23, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
Raised here. --Lord Belbury (talk) 09:51, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Balloon animal guy in Washington Square Park (00947).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Balloon animal guy in Washington Square Park (00947).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Dragon dance meets bird at NYC Lunar New Year parade (52336)e.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Dragon dance meets bird at NYC Lunar New Year parade (52336)e.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Dragon dancers after the NYC Lunar New Year parade (52464).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Dragon dancers after the NYC Lunar New Year parade (52464).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
NYC Lunar New Year parade (52182).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! NYC Lunar New Year parade (52182).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Blackwell Island Light (41757).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Blackwell Island Light (41757).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Maui in Oakland Inner Harbor (91604).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Maui in Oakland Inner Harbor (91604).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Container cranes in Oakland Inner Harbor (91560).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Container cranes in Oakland Inner Harbor (91560).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Eftichia in Oakland Inner Harbor (91582).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Eftichia in Oakland Inner Harbor (91582).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Bay Bridge (91690).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bay Bridge (91690).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Ships in the San Francisco Bay (91657).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ships in the San Francisco Bay (91657).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Vineyard in Napa Valley (01934).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Vineyard in Napa Valley (01934).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Bay Bridge (91696).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bay Bridge (91696).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

National School Walkout Rally (42491).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! National School Walkout Rally (42491).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
National School Walkout Rally (42539).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! National School Walkout Rally (42539).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
National School Walkout Rally (42565).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! National School Walkout Rally (42565).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
National School Walkout Rally (42615).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! National School Walkout Rally (42615).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey[edit]

WMF Surveys, 18:22, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey[edit]

WMF Surveys, 01:20, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey[edit]

WMF Surveys, 00:30, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Oculus (41331p)b.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Oculus (41331p)b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Oculus (41323p).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Oculus (41323p).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Oculus (41319p).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Oculus (41319p).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Oculus (41285p).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Oculus (41285p).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Great blue heron on torii (70296).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Great blue heron on torii (70296).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
National School Walkout Rally (42502).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! National School Walkout Rally (42502).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Oak apple (01839).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Oak apple (01839).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
2018 Women's March NYC (00360).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2018 Women's March NYC (00360).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
2018 Women's March NYC (00627).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2018 Women's March NYC (00627).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Alexander Hamilton Custom House Collector's Room ceiling (40571s).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Alexander Hamilton Custom House Collector's Room ceiling (40571s).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Golden eagle at ACES (11805).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Golden eagle at ACES (11805).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Oculus (41393p).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Oculus (41393p).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Parrots by a nest in the Green-Wood Cemetery gate (61839)a.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Parrots by a nest in the Green-Wood Cemetery gate (61839)a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Great blue heron on torii (70295)a.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Great blue heron on torii (70295)a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Parrot and starling flying around a nest in the Green-Wood Cemetery gate (61815).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Parrot and starling flying around a nest in the Green-Wood Cemetery gate (61815).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Prow on Roosevelt Island (41690).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Prow on Roosevelt Island (41690).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Roosevelt Island Bridge from the south (41860).jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Roosevelt Island Bridge, south side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Blackwell Island Light (41791).jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Blackwell Island Lighthouse.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Ravenswood Generating Station (41875).jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ravenswood Generating Station.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Westminster Arcade (62471).jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Westminster Arcade, Providence, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Jennifer Fox (81768).jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jennifer Fox.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Cynthia Erivo (82023).jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cynthia Erivo.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Westminster Arcade (62464).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Westminster Arcade (62464).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Cephalocereus senilis (70336).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Cephalocereus senilis (70336).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Viburnum × bodnantense dawn (70047).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Viburnum × bodnantense dawn (70047).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Hellebore in NYBG (70025).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hellebore in NYBG (70025).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Kalanchoe laxiflora (70641).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kalanchoe laxiflora (70641).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Cleistocactus strausii (70386).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Cleistocactus strausii (70386).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Hoya pubicalyx (70261).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hoya pubicalyx (70261).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Mammillaria parkinsonii (70369).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mammillaria parkinsonii (70369).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Medinilla magnifica (70487).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Medinilla magnifica (70487).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Cephalocereus senilis (70350).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Cephalocereus senilis (70350).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Western Wall at night (20063).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Western Wall at night (20063).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Cavendishia grandifolia (70309).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Cavendishia grandifolia (70309).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Cavendishia grandifolia (70318).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Cavendishia grandifolia (70318).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Seward statue in Madison Square Park (00284).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Seward statue in Madison Square Park (00284).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Thunbergia grandiflora (70181).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Thunbergia grandiflora (70181).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Bank of America tower from Bryant Park (10033).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bank of America tower from Bryant Park (10033).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Cephalocereus senilis (70349).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Cephalocereus senilis (70349).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Cleistocactus strausii (70391).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Cleistocactus strausii (70391).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Jade vine (70200).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Jade vine (70200).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Mammillaria bombycina (70456).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mammillaria bombycina (70456).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Phragmipedium les dirouilles (70500).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Phragmipedium les dirouilles (70500).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Hellebore in NYBG (70027).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hellebore in NYBG (70027).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Georgia Clark (10686).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Georgia Clark (10686).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Lesa Cline-Ransome (10744).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lesa Cline-Ransome (10744).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Aechmea fasciata (70295).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Aechmea fasciata (70295).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Anthony Del Col (11568).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Anthony Del Col (11568).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Dean Haspiel (11560).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Dean Haspiel (11560).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Hank Phillippi Ryan (11606).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hank Phillippi Ryan (11606).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Sally Field (11205).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sally Field (11205).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Steven Levenson (10425).jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Steven Levenson.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Seward statue in Madison Square Park (00284).jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
William H. Seward by Randolph Rogers.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Grady Hendrix (10822).jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Grady Hendrix.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
B.A. Shapiro (10937).jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
B. A. Shapiro.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Adele Griffin (11273).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Adele Griffin (11273).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Mary Higgins Clark (10649).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mary Higgins Clark (10649).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Natalie C. Parker (10669).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Natalie C. Parker (10669).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Rafael Lopez (10709.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rafael Lopez (10709.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

John Everson (10766).jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
John Everson.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Jarrett Krosoczka (10747).jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jarrett J. Krosoczka.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Anthony Del Col (11575).jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Anthony Del Col.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Hank Phillippi Ryan (11606).jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hank Phillippi Ryan.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

City Hall Station (32083)a.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! City Hall Station (32083)a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
City Hall Station (32128).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! City Hall Station (32128).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
City Hall Station (32166).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! City Hall Station (32166).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Tomi Adeyemi (22020).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Tomi Adeyemi (22020).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Tahereh Mafi (21994).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Tahereh Mafi (21994).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Afua Richardson (11644).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Afua Richardson (11644).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Angela Halgrimson (21919).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Angela Halgrimson (21919).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Anthony Del Col (11571).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Anthony Del Col (11571).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Anthony Del Col (11575).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Anthony Del Col (11575).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Kate Morton (11535).jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kate Morton.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Afua Richardson (11644).jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Afua Richardson.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Sarah Beth Durst (21801).jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sarah Beth Durst.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Chuck Palahniuk (21955).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chuck Palahniuk (21955).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
City Hall Station (32146).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! City Hall Station (32146).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Tomi Adeyemi (22020).jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tomi Adeyemi.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Angela Halgrimson (21919).jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Angela Halgrimson.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Wade Hudson (21910).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Wade Hudson (21910).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Turkey vultures (01745)a.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Turkey vultures (01745)a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Thunbergia grandiflora (70184).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Thunbergia grandiflora (70184).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Chuck Palahniuk (21943).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chuck Palahniuk (21943).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Chuck Palahniuk (21946).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chuck Palahniuk (21946).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Doris Kearns Goodwin (11126).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Doris Kearns Goodwin (11126).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Tahereh Mafi (21994).jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tahereh Mafi.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Bee balm seedhead (70424).jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Monarda didyma, seed head.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Chuck Palahniuk (21955).jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chuck Palahniuk.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Yerba Buena Island (91710).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Yerba Buena Island (91710).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Manis temminckii (29600162001).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Manis temminckii (29600162001).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Storkk (talk) 17:43, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Viburnum × bodnantense dawn (70047).jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Viburnum × bodnantense buds.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Kate Morton (11535).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kate Morton (11535).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Ships in the San Francisco Bay (91661).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ships in the San Francisco Bay (91661).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
2018 Women's March NYC (00747).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2018 Women's March NYC (00747).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Angela Halgrimson (21922).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Angela Halgrimson (21922).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Cephalocereus senilis (70338).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Cephalocereus senilis (70338).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Adventure Playground (11988)a.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Adventure Playground (Berkeley).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Crimetown Live (90167).jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Crimetown.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Alexander Hamilton Custom House Collector's Room ceiling (40511s).jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Alexander Hamilton U.S. Custom House Collector’s Office, ceiling.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

City Hall Station (32083).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! City Hall Station (32083).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
City Hall Station (32104)b.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! City Hall Station (32104)b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
City Hall Station (32155).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! City Hall Station (32155).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Mermaid Parade (60015).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mermaid Parade (60015).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Mermaid Parade (60132).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mermaid Parade (60132).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Mermaid Parade (61163)a.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mermaid Parade (61163)a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Mermaid Parade (60993).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mermaid Parade (60993).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Mermaid Parade (60976).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mermaid Parade (60976).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Mermaid Parade (60953).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mermaid Parade (60953).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Mermaid Parade (60072).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mermaid Parade (60072).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Mermaid Parade (60278).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mermaid Parade (60278).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Mermaid Parade (60518).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mermaid Parade (60518).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Mermaid Parade (60707).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mermaid Parade (60707).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Mermaid Parade (61042).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mermaid Parade (61042).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Mermaid Parade (61010).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mermaid Parade (61010).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Mermaid Parade (60841).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mermaid Parade (60841).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Mermaid Parade (60777).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mermaid Parade (60777).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Mermaid Parade (60711).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mermaid Parade (60711).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Doris Kearns Goodwin (11127)b.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Doris Kearns Goodwin (11127)b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Mermaid Parade (60940).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mermaid Parade (60940).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Mermaid Parade (60703)-2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mermaid Parade (60703)-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Mermaid Parade (60606).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mermaid Parade (60606).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Mermaid Parade (60592).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mermaid Parade (60592).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

Mermaid Parade (61042).jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Mermaid Parade (61042).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mermaid Parade (61042).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Sally Field (11196).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sally Field (11196).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Laura Holtz (21898).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Laura Holtz (21898).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Meg Medina (11591).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Meg Medina (11591).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Mermaid Parade (60954).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mermaid Parade (60954).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Mermaid Parade (60559)c.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mermaid Parade (60559)c.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Rick Riordan (10439).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rick Riordan (10439).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Frank Sileo (11473).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Frank Sileo (11473).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Kate Morton (11528).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kate Morton (11528).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Sayantani DasGupta (10757)a.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sayantani DasGupta (10757)a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Sam Maggs (11224).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sam Maggs (11224).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Sharon Draper (11515).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sharon Draper (11515).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Shane Evans (21772).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Shane Evans (21772).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Mermaid Parade (60761)c.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mermaid Parade (60761)c.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Doris Kearns Goodwin (11172).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Doris Kearns Goodwin (11172).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

Bee balm seedhead (70424).jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Bee balm seedhead (70424).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bee balm seedhead (70424).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

Mermaid Parade (60132).jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Mermaid Parade (60132).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mermaid Parade (60132).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Sharon Draper (11505).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sharon Draper (11505).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Calotropis gigantea (71541).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Calotropis gigantea (71541).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Chipmunk (71669).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chipmunk (71669).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Coleus (71543).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Coleus (71543).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Corpse flower (71254).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Corpse flower (71254).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

Fischlham Mevisto Cup 2017 Trickski Theresa Schmidberger1-1.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Fischlham Mevisto Cup 2017 Trickski Theresa Schmidberger1-1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fischlham Mevisto Cup 2017 Trickski Theresa Schmidberger1-1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Chipmunk (71666).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chipmunk (71666).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.
Corpse flower (71306)a.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Corpse flower (71306)a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 18 July 2018 (UTC)