User talk:Rhododendrites

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Contents

Possible FPCs[edit]

Experimenting with a permanent section on my talk page. I've opened sections at COM:CRIT in the past, but I'm uncomfortable posting there too often and/or taking up a lot of space there. So here are images I'm considering (as is or after edit) for featured picture candidates. I plan to add/remove from this section semi-regularly. If you think one is a particularly good or bad idea, or if you have thoughts about potential edits, please let me know below!

Last update: — Rhododendrites talk |  18:00, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

Comments[edit]

  • Thanks. Only reason I didn't nominate the Oculus before is that just after I went there, someone else submitted a picture of the same place to FPC. Figured I'd wait. Probably waited long enough now, though. :) — Rhododendrites talk |  22:15, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
  • ...
  • ...

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Comme des Garcons at the Met (62473).jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rei Kawakubo/Comme des Garçons Art of the In-Between.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Starling at a birdhouse (92030).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Starling at a birdhouse (92030).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:52, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
Squirrel in Central Park (10100).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Squirrel in Central Park (10100).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:53, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
but too dark --Charlesjsharp 14:36, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
Tufted titmouse (10092).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tufted titmouse (10092).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:53, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
Central Park (10162).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Central Park (10162).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:50, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Wood duck in Central Park (40771).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wood duck in Central Park (40771).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Seven Pandas 03:07, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
Cedar Falls (23410).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cedar Falls (23410).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Seven Pandas 03:07, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

DACA protest Columbus Circle (90598).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! DACA protest Columbus Circle (90598).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Seven Pandas 03:16, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
Dragon dancers after the NYC Lunar New Year parade (52445).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dragon dancers after the NYC Lunar New Year parade (52445).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Seven Pandas 03:16, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
Golden eagle at ACES (11824).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Golden eagle at ACES (11824).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Seven Pandas 03:17, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
View from Jefferson Market Library tower (42895).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View from Jefferson Market Library tower (42895).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 12:00, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Mermaid Parade (60278)a.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mermaid Parade (60278)a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 02:11, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
Starburst sea anemone (12295).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Starburst sea anemone (12295).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 02:12, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
Staten Island Lantern Festival (51937).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Staten Island Lantern Festival (51937).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 02:13, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
John Kerry (11108).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! John Kerry (11108).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --MB-one 11:28, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
Mammillaria bombycina (70458).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mammillaria bombycina (70458).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 05:11, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Cornell Tech buildings (41991).jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cornell Tech.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Mammillaria winterae (70383).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mammillaria winterae (70383).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:42, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
Mermaid Parade (60888).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mermaid Parade (60888).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 05:09, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Mammillaria bombycina (70456).jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mammillaria bombycina.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Clerodendrum quadriloculare flower at BBG (50789).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Clerodendrum quadriloculare flower at BBG (50789).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Seven Pandas 03:14, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
Daubeny's water lily at BBG (50824).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Daubeny's water lily at BBG (50824).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Seven Pandas 03:14, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Ruscus hypoglossum at BBG (50878).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ruscus hypoglossum at BBG (50878).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 07:59, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Bee on cornflower in Aspen (91223).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bee on cornflower in Aspen (91223).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:42, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Mute swan (20608).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mute swan (20608).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Whitfieldia elongata at BBG (50782).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Whitfieldia elongata at BBG (50782).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:50, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

Rudbeckia occidentalis on Aspen Mountain (91134).jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Rudbeckia occidentalis on Aspen Mountain (91134).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rudbeckia occidentalis on Aspen Mountain (91134).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

Helen Keller circa 1920 - restored.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Helen Keller circa 1920 - restored.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Helen Keller circa 1920 - restored.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Nuthatch in Prospect Park (20267).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nuthatch in Prospect Park (20267).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Seven Pandas 02:05, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
Juvenile black-crowned night heron (22055).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Juvenile black-crowned night heron (22055).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Seven Pandas 02:05, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

WSC2019 meeting[edit]

FYI this meeting is planned at the WikiSummit in Berlin at the end of March. All organizers and representatives of national chapters are invited or should take a look at the end at the summary of the event.

This message is left to everyone who was involved in the 2017 edition. Please spread the news to whom might be interested.--Alexmar983 (talk) 16:22, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Santa Cruz (01940).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santa Cruz (01940).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. Could be a little bit sharper, but OK. --XRay 06:30, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
Surfer in Santa Cruz (01991).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Surfer in Santa Cruz (01991).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:17, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
Black-crowned night heron (61502).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Black-crowned night heron (61502).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:51, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
Great blue heron (61210).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Great blue heron (61210).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 06:12, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
Great blue heron (61246).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Great blue heron (61246).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 06:12, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2018 is open![edit]

POTY barnstar.svg

Dear Rhododendrites,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in R1 of the 2018 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2018) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked.

In the final (and current) round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2018.

Round 2 will end 17 March 2019, 23:59:59.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 18:05, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Whitfieldia elongata at BBG (50736).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Whitfieldia elongata at BBG (50736).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 04:57, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
Pescadero Marsh (91813).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pescadero Marsh (91813).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Seven Pandas 02:06, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
Governors Island (72044p).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Governors Island (72044p).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Seven Pandas 02:06, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
Aloe flower (41062).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aloe flower (41062).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 04:59, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Anna's hummingbird (41124).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anna's hummingbird (41124).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 05:02, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Coleus (71579).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Coleus (71579).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:00, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Elephant seals at Ano Nuevo (91615).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Elephant seals at Ano Nuevo (91615).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:45, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Mermaid Parade (60068).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mermaid Parade (60068).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
No, it's a horrible poorly composed snapshot Tony May 03:54, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:45, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Mermaid Parade (61138).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mermaid Parade (61138).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support - Good photo of your subject, and I think the crops are acceptable in the context of a parade. -- Ikan Kekek 07:33, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Wood duck in Central Park (22262).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wood duck in Central Park (22262).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 01:14, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
American goldfinch in Green-Wood Cemetery (62438).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! American goldfinch in Green-Wood Cemetery (62438).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Fischer.H 09:34, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
Sweet gum seed pod in Green-Wood Cemetery (62398).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sweet gum seed pod in Green-Wood Cemetery (62398).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality, the location is broken. --Trougnouf 01:15, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Snow goose in Central Park (32949).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Snow goose in Central Park (32949).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:39, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
Snow goose in Central Park (33138).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Snow goose in Central Park (33138).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:38, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Hudson Fur (61971)a.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bonded Vault heist.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Station Fire Memorial Park (71985).jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Station Fire Memorial Park entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

A cupcake for you![edit]

Choco-Nut Bake with Meringue Top cropped.jpg
Cosplayer (Pennywise from It) at New York Comic Con, October 2018.jpg
Hello! thanks for the image, it is very good-looking and has a good angle and color tone, I really love it! also I used it in w:fa:کازپلی. Editor-1 (talk) 11:49, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
@Editor-1: Thanks for the cupcake! :) Glad to hear the image is useful. I went to New York Comic Con last year specifically to try to take pictures for Commons. My first time at such an event, and I'm hoping to make it again this year. :) — Rhododendrites talk |  13:28, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
So please take some images with similar angle and *background*, that category will be in my radar (watch). Thanks and good luck! -- Editor-1 (talk) 15:19, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Crocuses at BBG (43248).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Crocuses at BBG (43248).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Eatcha 05:41, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
Daubeny's water-lily at BBG (43428).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Daubeny's water-lily at BBG (43428).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Eatcha 05:40, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
Magnolia x veitchii bud at BBG (43311).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Magnolia x veitchii bud at BBG (43311).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Eatcha 05:43, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
Magnolia x veitchii bug at BBG (43315).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Magnolia x veitchii bug at BBG (43315).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:45, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

Daubeny's water lily at BBG (50824).jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Daubeny's water lily at BBG (50824).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Daubeny's water lily at BBG (50824).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

FPC opinion[edit]

@W.carter, Ikan Kekek: Hello! Feeling a little gunshy after (sticking with the metaphor) a couple recent misfires at FPC. In the past you've both offered valuable advice and I wonder if I could put upon you to share your thoughts regarding whether any of these three images are worth nominating. No worries if not or if you don't have the time or inclination, though. :) Thanks. — Rhododendrites talk |  03:49, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

It's nice to know that I've been helpful. I'll take these in order: Nice photo of Pescadero Marsh, but I might not support it unless the composition grows on me, so I'm not sure how others would react. My guess is that it would get a positive reception, but who knows? Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:03, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
The magnolia bud is beautiful, though I wish there were more contrast on the right side. I'm not sure I'd vote for it, but I think it's worth nominating. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:06, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
I think the seed pod is great and should be nominated. I'll definitely support! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:12, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
@Ikan Kekek: Thanks so much! With such an unequivocal note on the last one, I went ahead and nominated it. I wouldn't have hesitated with that one if it were perfectly centered in front of the background -- guess we'll see if others perceive that as problematic. — Rhododendrites talk |  04:36, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
Sorry for being late, but I'm in another time zone than you guys. When I see a really good photo, I actually get a physical gut reaction to it before I can start analyze it. The only photo giving me that here is the bud. It is simple and dynamic. The field is lacking a good light or something and the one with the seed pod is a bit too contrived with the distracting building behind it. Just my two cents, --Cart (talk) 08:08, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
@W.carter: You're not late. I'm just impulsive sometimes. :) The light on the field is an example of something that I have a hard time predicting whether it will help or hurt (there's some drama to it, with the left half cloudy and the right half of the reeds in shadow (it was a gap in a rainy day). I can see where the mausoleum in the background would be contrived. Lots of dark branches on one side, mausoleum on the other side... figured I might as well center it, but maybe the choice should've just been an even narrower DOF (or find a different sweet gum tree). Anyway, thanks both for your input. I still never know how things will go, with very rare exception. Think I'll take another break until I have something more certain. — Rhododendrites talk |  13:39, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Star magnolia bud at BBG (43375).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Star magnolia bud at BBG (43375).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good Quality -- PtrQs 23:08, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Star magnolia bud at BBG (43333).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Star magnolia bud at BBG (43333).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 04:30, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
Great egret in Green-Wood Cemetery (03601).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Great egret in Green-Wood Cemetery (03601).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good Quality -- PtrQs 23:06, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Northern mockingbird in Green-Wood Cemetery (03570).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Great egret in Green-Wood Cemetery (03570).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 04:31, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Red-tailed hawk in Central Park (92541).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Red-tailed hawk in Central Park (92541).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Some blue CA at the right side should be removed. --Ermell 13:40, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
@Ermell: Ah! Yes I should've seen this. Fixed now. Thanks. Rhododendrites 22:39, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:29, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

30 Hudson Yards (92900).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 30 Hudson Yards (92900).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Lord Stirling park (63656)p.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lord Stirling park (63656)p.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 02:39, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
Cycas debaoensis at BBG (50863).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cycas debaoensis at BBG (50863).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 02:39, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
Crocuses at BBG (43173).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Crocuses at BBG (43173).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 02:39, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
Rhododendron mucronulatum pink peignoir (70036).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rhododendron mucronulatum pink peignoir (70036).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 02:39, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
Snow goose in Central Park (33021).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Snow goose in Central Park (33021).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 02:39, 12 April 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

Crocuses at BBG (43248).jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Crocuses at BBG (43248).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Crocuses at BBG (43248).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

  • Ta-Daaah! Face-smile.svg Congrats!! --Cart (talk) 13:32, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Thank you kindly -- and even categorized! :) — Rhododendrites talk |  15:09, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Full service. :) --Cart (talk) 09:36, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

Comme des Garcons at the Met (62473).jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Comme des Garcons at the Met (62473).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Comme des Garcons at the Met (62473).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

The merit is for you! Yann (talk) 06:27, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

Thanks, Yann! — Rhododendrites talk |  14:39, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Comme des Garcons at the Met (62473).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Comme des Garcons at the Met (62473).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

Need your presence at Featured sound candidates[edit]

FPCandiateicon.svg We request the honor of your presence at Featured sound candidates
Dear Rhododendrites,
Featured sound candidates needs your help and you can participate by reviewing or nominating sounds for the FS tag.

You can start reviewing/nominating sounds now. Welcome! -- Eatcha (Talk-Page) 19:35, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Hell Gate Bridge (84462)p.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hell Gate Bridge (84462)p.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 03:58, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Hell Gate Bridge (84459)p.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hell Gate Bridge (84459)p.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 03:58, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Susan Dennard at BookCon (16111).jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Susan Dennard.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
RJ Palacio at BookCon (16102).jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
R. J. Palacio.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Julia London at BookCon (16233).jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Julia London.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Jennifer Armentrout at BookCon (16059).jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jennifer Armentrout.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Alice Hoffman at BookExpo (04985).jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Alice Hoffman.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
David J. Danelo at BookExpo (04903).jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
David J. Danelo.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
David Mizejewski at BookExpo (04880).jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
David Mizejewski.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Derrick Barnes at BookExpo (05633).jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Derrick Barnes.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Karine Jean-Pierre at BookExpo (05336).jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Karine Jean-Pierre.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Natasha Ngan at BookExpo (05719).jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Natasha Ngan.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Eoin Colfer at BookExpo (05180).jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Eoin Colfer.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Marcia Butler at BookExpo (04845).jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Marcia Butler.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Max Brooks at BookExpo (15957).jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Max Brooks.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Susan Isaacs at BookExpo (05424).jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Susan Isaacs.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Yu Rong at BookExpo (05745).jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Yu Rong.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Matthew Mather at BookCon (26627).jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Matthew Mather.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Ira Flatow at BookCon (26611).jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ira Flatow.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Stephanie Garber at BookCon (26730).jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Stephanie Garber.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Saeed Jones at BookExpo (04832).jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saeed Jones.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Jenny Han at BookCon (26746).jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jenny Han.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Tarryn Fisher at BookExpo (05357).jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tarryn Fisher.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Ant Timpson at Tribeca (64071).jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ant Timpson.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

City Reliquary (57305).jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
City Reliquary.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Your imports[edit]

Hi, if you upload a file, e.g. File:Horseshoe crab righting itself on Plumb Beach (57349) - edit 2.webm, without adding a license then it will be tagged for a deletion and deleted after 7 days if not fixed. Then you can't come next day and upload it again, again without a license. We won't allow such a file another 7 days in the 'no license since' process. Please make sure that all the files you import here are properly licensed and have everything else in order. If you don't want to do the necessary after care, please don't import files. Jcb (talk) 17:04, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

@Jcb: I uploaded several files. Video2commons is not conducive to easy adding of information, so they're temporarily without license information until I see they're uploaded and update them. That happens minutes after they're uploaded. Only one time in the past have I forgotten to go back and do so (the original version of this file), and it was deleted after 7 days. So I went back today to reupload. To my surprise, as soon as I see the upload is done the file has been deleted (i.e. before I can add my licensing info). And deleted it with reason "Recreation of content deleted per community consensus (G4)". Where is the community consensus that the file should be deleted? It was not deleted at DR, or due to copyright violation, etc., but due to missing information. That's a 7-day process, not immediate deletion. Please restore. — Rhododendrites talk |  17:17, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
The log tells a different story. I deleted the file 48 minutes after the reupload. That should have been plenty of time to add a license and to fill in the information template. This is indeed a 7-day process, not a 7-day + another 7-day process. Also we don't accept reuploads of deleted content. We have COM:UDR, where they will typically ask you for the relevant source and authorship information before a file is undeleted. Jcb (talk) 21:32, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
@Jcb: It takes a long time to upload. Had I not been in a meeting when it finished, it would've been done. Alas, 48 minutes. Yes. So are you saying you will not restore it? — Rhododendrites talk |  21:41, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
Yes, you were not allowed to reupload it in the first place. You can request undeletion of the first upload via the established way, but you will have to provide adequat information, so that the processing admin can determine whether there is a valid free license. Until now you have failed to provide such information, so that it's unknown to us whether the file can legally be hosted at Commons. Jcb (talk) 21:57, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

FV Promotion[edit]

This video has been promoted to Featured videos!

The video File:Wood thrush in Central Park switch sides (16510).webm, that you nominated on Commons:Featured video candidates/File:Wood thrush in Central Park switch sides (16510).webm has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another video, please do so.

Featured videos logo square.svg

/FVCBot (talk) 09:17, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Mermaid Parade 2019 (27584)a.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mermaid Parade 2019 (27584)a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Vengolis 01:49, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
Mermaid Parade 2019 (27732).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mermaid Parade 2019 (27732).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Vengolis 01:50, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
Mermaid Parade 2019 (27845).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mermaid Parade 2019 (27845).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Vengolis 01:50, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Mermaid Parade 2019 (27867).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mermaid Parade 2019 (27867).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 08:32, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
Mermaid Parade 2019 (28030).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mermaid Parade 2019 (28030).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 08:32, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

Photo walk in Stockholm[edit]

It's only a few weeks until Wikimania 2019 in Sweden. I'd like to invite you to the Commons Photographer's photo walk. If you're planning on going to Stockholm in August, please consider joining this event. This is an opportunity to connect with other photographers, have fun together, and explore the beauty of an iconic Scandinavian city… All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:41, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

File:Horseshoe crab trying to right itself (57348).jpg[edit]

So... did you pass the Voight-Kampff Test. Face-smile.svg --Cart (talk) 17:27, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

@W.carter: Wait, so, you're saying the crab looks like the machine he used to administer the test in that scene, right? (as a typical replicant, I try to deflect by answering with a question). Also, that file was instructive for me -- don't leave auto whitebalance on while in video mode (water color flashes from blue to beige -- gah!). :)
BTW: you've already given lots of good suggestions for things to see in Sweden. I wonder if there's a particular recommendation you have to see wildlife -- and birds in particular. I know of at least a couple other people who would be interested and are going to Wikimania (including people not so active on Commons). Just curious. :) — Rhododendrites talk |  03:07, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
"The tortoise lays on its back, its belly baking in the hot sun, beating its legs trying to turn itself over, but it can't...." Glad to confirm that you are a fellow replicant. Face-smile.svg
Wildlife is rather scattered in the Stockholm area, much of it is best experienced in the archipelago or in the forests south of the city. For bird watching and a good experience, you should try to get to Ängsö National Park [1], there are boats to the island. Easy access to the north and outer archipelago can be made around Grisslehamn [2]. South of Stockholm there is a recreational area called Lida [3], where there are trails, walkways and hide-outs in the wetlands for bird watching. Some areas in the archipelago are off-limits to for foreigners since they are part of military installations. I don't know how much they enforce this is but you can get arrested if you (a non-Swede) trespass.
These are the places that first come to mind, if any other pops up, I'll be sure to tell you. --Cart (talk) 08:42, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Mermaid Parade 2019 (27858).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mermaid Parade 2019 (27858).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:46, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
Osprey bringing food to its nest at Jamaica Bay Wildlife Refuge (97261).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Osprey bringing food to its nest at Jamaica Bay Wildlife Refuge (97261).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --GT1976 01:05, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
Oystercatcher at Rockaway Beach (60155).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oystercatcher at Rockaway Beach (60155).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --GT1976 01:05, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
Turtle Pond Central Park (00115)p.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Turtle Pond Central Park (00115)p.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Seven Pandas 22:26, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Mute swan cygnet pontoon in Prospect Park (80364).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mute swan cygnet pontoon in Prospect Park (80364).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --GT1976 06:36, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Mute swan cygnets learning in Prospect Park (80222).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mute swan cygnets learning in Prospect Park (80222).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --GT1976 06:36, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Photographer Barnstar.png The Photographer's Barnstar
For your Ellis Island photos. They show what a keen photographic eye you have developed. Chapeau! Cart (talk) 09:26, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
Hej, W.carter. God morgon. Tack.
I've made limited progress in my preparation for next month. :)
I think if there is such a profession as motivational photographer, you would do well at it. — Rhododendrites talk |  15:13, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
Hahaha!! I like to see people flourish around me. Face-grin.svg Here is another good one for you in phonetic Stockholm dialect: "Aere okay om ja fotar här?" = Is it ok for me to take photographs here? --Cart (talk) 15:39, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
  • I realized that my answer was a bit flippant and didn't exactly convey what I really meant, so let's try this again:
No, this was not any kind of pep-star. I am seriously impressed by those photos. I like the 'abandoned' genre and I follow exhibitions and artist with such photos online. Your Ellis series is definitely en par with many of these professionals. They may not all fly at FPC, but that is simply because most voters couldn't find the value of an excellent composition even if it jumped up and bit them in the arse. (Pardon my language) That place is just too focused on the technical side. Step out into the real world and your photos would get quite a different reception. Have you thought about showcasing stuff on Instagram? I know most Commoners turn up their noses at such things, but it is all about what channels you follow. There are photography sites, exhibition venues and museums that I follow and they give me a healthy inspirational dose of photography outside FPC. Oh well, just a thought, keep doing what you do. :) --Cart (talk) 19:35, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
Oh, no, I didn't take it as a pepstar. I was just observing that your encouragement is effective. That's just gratitude, not an examination of your motives. :) I've thought about Instagram, yes, and I've been encouraged to use it by people I've taken pictures of (apparently people who pose for a picture like to be able to see them afterwards -- who knew? :) ). I think I technically have an account, but I'm just not a big fan of Facebook. Maybe if the Next Big Photo Site comes along I'll try that one. I tweet things and reddit things sometimes, but not with any regularity. — Rhododendrites talk |  17:56, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
I'm also a card-carrying member of the F*** FB group, but used with caution, I can live with Instagram. I just use is as a simple search tool for photos I'm interested in, with all extra options turned off. Otherwise I'm really lazy on social media. The Wiki-verse is about enough for me. ;) --Cart (talk) 22:21, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

Oculus (41323p).jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Oculus (41323p).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Oculus (41323p).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Susanna White (51474) (cropped).jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Susanna White.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Alexandre Rockwell (41412).jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Alexandre Rockwell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Bill Camp (51526).jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bill Camp.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

FP Promotion[edit]

Ellis Island hospital (01897).jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Ellis Island hospital (01897).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ellis Island hospital (01897).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Mute swan and cygnets in Prospect Park (80377).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mute swan and cygnets in Prospect Park (80377).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 03:02, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
Black-crowned night heron (61438).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Black-crowned night heron (61438).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Vengolis 03:29, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
Caitlin Zaloom at BookExpo (05469).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Caitlin Zaloom at BookExpo (05469).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. A little bit noisy, but acceptable. --XRay 04:27, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
Aloe flower (41065).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aloe flower (41065).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Vengolis 03:22, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
Anna's hummingbird (41119).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anna's hummingbird (41119).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Vengolis 03:24, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

City Hall Station (32155).jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:City Hall Station (32155).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:City Hall Station (32155).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

Featured Picture Nomination[edit]

FPCandiateicon.svg

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that the image Magnolia x veitchii bug at BBG (43315).jpg, which was created or uploaded by you, has been nominated for featured picture status; have a look at the nomination page. Thank you and good luck!

Good luck, it's a lovely composition. -- Cmao20 (talk) 19:27, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

City Hall Station (32092)a.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! City Hall Station (32092)a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:50, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
City Hall Station (32120)a.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! City Hall Station (32120)a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Interesting image and good quality -- Spurzem 21:08, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
Corpse flower (71334)a.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corpse flower (71334)a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Isiwal 04:12, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
Hell Gate Bridge (84449)p.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hell Gate Bridge (84449)p.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:50, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

Hell Gate Bridge (84459)p.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Hell Gate Bridge (84459)p.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hell Gate Bridge (84459)p.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 13:04, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

Mute swan cygnets learning in Prospect Park (80222).jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Mute swan cygnets learning in Prospect Park (80222).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mute swan cygnets learning in Prospect Park (80222).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

Magnolia x veitchii bug at BBG (43315).jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Magnolia x veitchii bug at BBG (43315).jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Magnolia x veitchii bug at BBG (43315).jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Artichoke thistle at BBG (70713)b.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Artichoke thistle at BBG (70713)b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:46, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Johnston, Mary gravestone.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mary Johnston, grave.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Phlox (70856).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phlox (70856).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Common tern at Brooklyn Bridge Park (21040).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Common tern at Brooklyn Bridge Park (21040).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:19, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
Duckling in Central Park (81320).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Duckling in Central Park (81320).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:21, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Fishing hut and sauna on the sea (93039).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fishing hut and sauna on the sea (93039).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Seven Pandas 01:58, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Oregrund (92918)p.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oregrund (92918)p.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Seven Pandas 01:58, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Pike head (92981).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pike head (92981).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:26, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Great tit on Djurgarden (52307).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Great tit on Djurgarden (52307).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --MB-one 16:14, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Djurgarden gate (52112).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Djurgarden gate (52112).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Aristeas 17:45, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Gate at Vaxholm Fortress (41800).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gate at Vaxholm Fortress (41800).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:52, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Waldemarsviken (62433)p.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Waldemarsviken (62433)p.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Cayambe 11:08, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Flower on Djurgarden (52354).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Flower on Djurgarden (52354).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Cayambe 11:07, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Vaxholm (41868)p.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vaxholm (41868)p.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:26, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support Suggest description and caption be made more descriptive for a global audience – say, “Town of Vaxholm in the Stockholm archipelago, Sweden”. Also if you can bring out a little more shadow detail in the town in foreground, this would make a stronger image. --GRDN711 11:17, 25 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

Waldemarsviken (62433)p.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Waldemarsviken (62433)p.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Waldemarsviken (62433)p.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments in the United States – Back for 2019![edit]

LUSITANA WLM 2011 d.svgThis user participated in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Want to show your participation in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019? Add {{User Wiki Loves Monuments 2019}} to your userpage!
Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 in the United States - Logo (text under).svg

Hello! Last year you contributed to Wiki Loves Monuments 2018 in the United States. Thanks to people like you it was a great success, with over 1,900 people contributing over 10,000 photos of cultural and historic sites from all over the country. Hundreds of these photos now help illustrate Wikipedia articles, improving our open knowledge about United States history, culture, and heritage. If you haven't seen the winners yet, be sure to check them out here.

I'm pleased to say that we're back this year with Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 in the United States, and I'd like to welcome you to participate once again in the event. Check out our updated event page for more information. Just like last year, you'll be able to upload your photos of any registered historical site in the United States through the end of September (even if the photos were taken before this month).

If you've traveled and taken photos of monuments in non-US countries, you can see if those countries are also participating here.

Once again, thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2018, and we hope to see you again in this year's event! If you'd like to respond to this message directly, please do so on on my talk page. ~Kevin Payravi (talk) 05:15, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

HMS af Chapman (41705).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! HMS af Chapman (41705).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:06, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Cleistocactus strausii (70387).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cleistocactus strausii (70387).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:06, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
John Hodgman at BookExpo (05162).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! John Hodgman at BookExpo (05162).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:35, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Lilla Höggarn (41932).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lilla Höggarn (41932).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:06, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Vaxholm (41882)p.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vaxholm (41882)p.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

There are several stitching errors. Please try to fix them. --XRay 04:37, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
XRay Oh dear. I think the issues you're seeing are the result of a botched perspective correction rather than stitching errors. I've uploaded a version without it. If you're still seeing errors, would you mind adding a note to a couple of them? Thanks. Rhododendrites 14:00, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality now. I'd checked the flag poles again and it seems to be OK now. Thank you. --XRay 17:23, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

The Corinthian (13547).jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Corinthian (Manhattan).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Lilla Höggarn (41932).jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lilla Höggarn.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Stromparterren (52098).jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Strömparterren.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

FV Promotion[edit]

This video has been promoted to Featured videos!

The video File:Duckling preening (81313).webm, that you nominated on Commons:Featured video candidates/File:Duckling preening (81313).webm has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another video, please do so.

Featured videos logo square.svg

/FVCBot (talk) 13:02, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 01:16, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Mute swan cygnet pontoon in Prospect Park (80358).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mute swan cygnet pontoon in Prospect Park (80358).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --D-Kuru 01:19, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Permanent Mission of India to the United Nations door (13588).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Permanent Mission of India to the United Nations door (13588).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:13, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Blue-winged wasp (13533).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blue-winged wasp (13533).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Axel Tschentscher 05:56, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
Cabbage white (13362).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cabbage white (13362).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Axel Tschentscher 05:56, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Pier 66 and Hudson Yards (01473)p.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pier 66 and Hudson Yards (01473)p.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --DXR 18:29, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
American kestrel (44273).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! American kestrel (44273).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:29, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
Eastern screech owl (44333).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eastern screech owl (44333).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 18:06, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
Eurasian eagle-owl (44078).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eurasian eagle-owl (44078).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:43, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
Eurasian eagle-owl (44088).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eurasian eagle-owl (44088).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --DXR 18:29, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
Marigold (13389).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marigold (13389).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --SH6188 06:18, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Vaxholm Fortress (41819).jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vaxholm Castle, interior courtyard.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Red-tailed hawk (44371).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Red-tailed hawk (44371).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:02, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
Eastern screech owl (44327).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eastern screech owl (44327).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:02, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
Camp - Notes on Fashion at the Met - Burberry rainbow cape (73854).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Camp - Notes on Fashion at the Met - Burberry rainbow cape (73854).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:02, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 15:25, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

Pier 66 and Hudson Yards (01473)p.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Pier 66 and Hudson Yards (01473)p.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pier 66 and Hudson Yards (01473)p.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

New user box for feature videos[edit]

As you're also interested in featured videos: I created a new userbox, see this edit. Best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:50, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

Eldridge Street Synagogue (42773).jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Eldridge Street Synagogue (42773).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Eldridge Street Synagogue (42773).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments in the United States 2019 – Last day to enter![edit]

LUSITANA WLM 2011 d.svgThis user participated in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.
Want to show your participation in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019? Add {{User Wiki Loves Monuments 2019}} to your userpage!
Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 in the United States - Logo (text under).svg

September 30th is the last day to upload photos for Wiki Loves Monuments! We're thrilled that the United States has almost reached 4,000 contributions so far this year. Of these images, ~370 (~9%) have already been used to help illustrate Wikipedia articles and pages on other wiki projects, which is fantastic.

If you've already made a photo contribution this year, thanks so much! If you have any last-minute photos of U.S. historical sites to upload and enter into the contest, today's the day to do it. Check out the United States event page for more information. Judging will take place throughout the month of October, after which the top-ten national finalists will be announced in early November.

If you've traveled and taken photos of monuments in non-US countries, you can see if those countries are also participating here.

As always, thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments! If you'd like to respond to this message directly, please do so on on my talk page. ~Kevin Payravi (talk) 05:49, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

John Papa Gros (84755).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! John Papa Gros (84755).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:54, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
Monarch butterfly in BBG (84685).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monarch butterfly in BBG (84685).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:56, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 1 October 2019 (UTC)


Monarch butterfly in BBG (84685)

Hello:

Good image. Given its wide migration pattern, the monarch is one of the most common butterflies. Consider adding genus "Danaus plexippus" to the image description for completeness.

Best,

--GRDN711 (talk) 20:08, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

@GRDN711: Thanks! Per your request, I've added it to the description (I tend to focus on categories more than the description). They are common, yes. I do not live in a place with a great deal of variety when it comes to butterflies and moths. When this one is promoted to FP it will be my second butterfly FP -- and both are monarchs. :) I'll have to try to find others... — Rhododendrites talk |  20:29, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Grass skipper on zinnia in BBG (84499).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grass skipper on zinnia in BBG (84499).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Llez 05:12, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
Monarch butterfly in BBG (84681).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monarch butterfly in BBG (84681).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Llez 05:10, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Monarch butterfly in BBG (84684).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monarch butterfly in BBG (84684).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 03:54, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
Grass skipper in BBG (84651).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grass skipper in BBG (84651).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 03:54, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
New York Central Railroad 69th Street Transfer Bridge (01590).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! New York Central Railroad 69th Street Transfer Bridge (01590).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:35, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Eurasian eagle-owl (44034).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eurasian eagle-owl (44034).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:33, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

Monarch butterfly in BBG (84685).jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Monarch butterfly in BBG (84685).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Monarch butterfly in BBG (84685).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 13:04, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Stabilimentum in a garden spider web (43947).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stabilimentum in a garden spider web (43947).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Moroder 21:23, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

Eastern screech owl (44333).jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Eastern screech owl (44333).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Eastern screech owl (44333).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Grass skipper on zinnia in BBG (84665).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grass skipper on zinnia in BBG (84665).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Seven Pandas 01:40, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
Watsonia at BBG (43479).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Watsonia at BBG (43479).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Seven Pandas 01:40, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
Alstroemeria in BBG (54979).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alstroemeria in BBG (54979).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 04:23, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
Song sparrow on amaranth in BBG (54965).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Song sparrow on amaranth in BBG (54965).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. Looks like it eats the flowers. So the common sparrow in these parts is called the song sparrow? They are certainly very chattery, but not too melodic. :-) -- Ikan Kekek 04:21, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
Painted lady on zinnia in BBG (84611).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Painted lady on zinnia in BBG (84611).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. This is the same kind of butterfly I've taken lots of cellphone photos of in New Rochelle. Of course it's way smaller and less detailed that way. :-) -- Ikan Kekek 04:18, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Featured video UserBox[edit]

Hi Rhododendrites,

If you wish you can use the new userbox for FV which shows

Featured videos logo square.svgThis user has uploaded 2 featured videos to Wikimedia Commons.

. -- Eatcha (talk) 09:47, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

FV Promotion[edit]

This video has been promoted to Featured videos!

The video File:09. Гасење вар како силно егзотермент процес.webm, that you nominated on Commons:Featured video candidates/File:09. Гасење вар како силно егзотермент процес.webm has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another video, please do so.

Featured videos logo square.svg

/FVCBot (talk) 06:15, 18 October 2019 (UTC)