Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Münster, Torminbrücke -- 2016 -- 2358.jpg

File:Münster, Torminbrücke -- 2016 -- 2358.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 May 2016 at 05:06:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Münster, Torminbrücke -- 2016 -- 2358.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Münster, Torminbrücke -- 2016 -- 2358.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Germany
•  Info all by XRay -- XRay ^talk 05:06, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- XRay ^talk 05:06, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
• Mild  Oppose for now - I understand why you like this photo. I think I might vote for it if you cropped the near side of the bridge just to the left of the reflections on its underside. Right now, to my eyes, there's too great a bulk of dark stone that doesn't help my eyes move the way the reflections, posts and sky do. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:35, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Alternative

•  Info Extracted image (proposed by Ikan Kekek). --XRay ^talk 05:48, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
•  Support IMO it's a good candidate too. --XRay ^talk 05:56, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
•  Support - The crop could even be a bit closer to the reflections, but this is good enough for me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:51, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

• The crop could be closer, yes. Now it's one of my favourite aspect ratios: 5:4 (or 4:5). --XRay ^talk 05:55, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

• I wouldn't privilege the aspect ratio over other aspects of the composition, but as I said, I won't insist. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:12, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

•  Oppose Not really working for me, I'm afraid. Concrete, brown water. -- Colin (talk) 11:40, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
• Ikan Kekek did you set your screen ? --Mile (talk) 12:12, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

• What are you talking about? Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:34, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

• Sorry, it's the real color of the water. --XRay ^talk 13:42, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

•  Oppose Per Colin. INeverCry 19:23, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose Like Ikan, I can () see why you took this picture and nominated it. And it's definitely a QI. But ... striking composition aside, it seems to me that the color is too weak. I don't know if that was how you originally took it, or if it was some result of the processing. Daniel Case (talk) 17:47, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

•  I withdraw my nomination I do not expect these images will be FP. Thanks for your reviews and helpful comments. --XRay ^talk 19:02, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /XRay ^talk 04:25, 20 May 2016 (UTC)