Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Michael Ancher portrætfoto 2 - Restoration.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Michael Ancher portrætfoto 2 - Restoration.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Oct 2016 at 13:22:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
Info Unknown photographer - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 13:22, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 13:22, 6 October 2016 (UTC)- Support -- Great work and thanks for doing this. --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 15:09, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
- Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 17:08, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
Oppose Certainly nicely restored photo, but not a nice photo itself. A left sleeve out of focus, a right ear partially too. Masur (talk) 17:35, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
- See Adam's response to my similar observation at the English WP's FPC page. Daniel Case (talk) 02:24, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
- Still, I judge the picture as it is, and not as it was or could be. And, I stress it, I appreciate the fact of digital restoration, however it doesn't automatically qualify this pic to be a featured one. Masur (talk) 15:59, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
- See Adam's response to my similar observation at the English WP's FPC page. Daniel Case (talk) 02:24, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
- "Only registered contributors whose Commons accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote." Jee 01:28, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
- Support Fine restauration. --Pugilist (talk) 19:37, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
- Support lNeverCry 20:00, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
- Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:24, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:41, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
. -- Slaunger (talk) 20:25, 7 October 2016 (UTC)- Oppose Black and white image with a pink tint. --Yann (talk) 16:13, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
- @Yann: That's just a sepia tone. More brown than pink, I'd say; In RGB, Pink would have G and B fairly equal and R significantly higher; a spot check shows that pixels from the image, to give two representative examples, are R 198 G 177 B 156 and R 19 G 16 B 9. - both in the range of yellow/orange, or, well, a sepia image, which is, historically, one of the most common types of black and white image. Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:39, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
- It would be fine with a pure sepia, but here I see a pink/yellow tint (most visible on the forehead). A pure sepia image would look like File:La Belle Otero, par Jean Reutlinger, sepia.jpg. Yann (talk) 14:50, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
- Considering it is not a grey-scale image, but sepia toned, the photo really should have an embedded sRGB color profile, but there is no color-space metadata and no embedded color profile. Striking my support until fixed.-- Slaunger (talk) 20:54, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
- @Yann: That's just a sepia tone. More brown than pink, I'd say; In RGB, Pink would have G and B fairly equal and R significantly higher; a spot check shows that pixels from the image, to give two representative examples, are R 198 G 177 B 156 and R 19 G 16 B 9. - both in the range of yellow/orange, or, well, a sepia image, which is, historically, one of the most common types of black and white image. Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:39, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
Question Any idea about when this photo was taken ? This should be an interesting information in the file page...--Jebulon (talk) 13:53, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
- A guess from 1890-1900. --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 14:59, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
- I can't find a source for the date, I'm afraid. Adam Cuerden (talk) 16:36, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
- A guess from 1890-1900. --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 14:59, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /lNeverCry 05:20, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: People
