Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Olympiastadion, Múnich, Alemania 2012-04-28, DD 01.JPG
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Olympiastadion, Múnich, Alemania 2012-04-28, DD 01.JPG, not featured
[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2012 at 00:17:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info Aerial view of the Olympiastadion (host of the Olympic Games in 1972), Munich, Germany. All by me, Poco a poco (talk) 00:17, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 00:17, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
Oppose Greens in top left and bottom left look oversaturated and unsharp. Also, a bit of overexposure in some parts (e.g. white oval in top left corner). -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:41, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
- Well, according to the histogramm there was no overexposure but I retouched it. I also reduced saturation a bit in that area. Poco a poco (talk) 02:36, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
- Comparing the two side by side, it seems like the left side in the new version got much brighter compared to the rest of the image somehow. It might be due to your saturation fix (if you only applied it in one area); I would only do color adjustments to the entire image, lest strange effects appear like this. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:26, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
- Ok, new try, no local adjustments Poco a poco (talk) 04:10, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
- If my eyes don't deceive me, it appears saturation has actually increased in the newest version. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:23, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
- Ok, new try, no local adjustments Poco a poco (talk) 04:10, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
- Comparing the two side by side, it seems like the left side in the new version got much brighter compared to the rest of the image somehow. It might be due to your saturation fix (if you only applied it in one area); I would only do color adjustments to the entire image, lest strange effects appear like this. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:26, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
- Well, according to the histogramm there was no overexposure but I retouched it. I also reduced saturation a bit in that area. Poco a poco (talk) 02:36, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
- Weak Oppose Nice view, but also Overprocessed: lack of detail, especially seen on trees. --Ivar (talk) 06:55, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
- Support -- it's so mo. Penyulap ☏ 03:24, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
- Support Tomer T (talk) 15:49, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
- Weak Support Nice view, but the colors leave a bit to be desired. Michael Barera (talk) 19:14, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
- Support -- Gildir (talk) 17:37, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /A.Savin 12:25, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
