Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Panorama vom Aussichtspunkt Via Regia.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2016 at 18:28:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Panoramas
Info created by Jörg Braukmann - uploaded by milseburg - nominated by Milseburg -- Milseburg (talk) 18:28, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Support -- Milseburg (talk) 18:28, 16 September 2016 (UTC)- Support INeverCry 21:28, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support - Good God, that goes on for freakin ever! It's like vicariously visiting an entire region! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:39, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support -- Bijay Chaurasia (Talk) 04:30, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support ~ Moheen (talk) 07:53, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support --cart-Talk 08:01, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Comment I doubt you can sort the technical problems. The electricity pylons and cables on the right hand side show several obvious stitching errors. Charles (talk) 09:23, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Are you serious? In the distance you can´t recognize each screw. The Panorama conforms to the single original foto in that direction. Do I need to upload it? --Milseburg (talk) 13:42, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- I was serious, but I misinterpreted pylons hidden by valley as stitching errors. My error, sorry. Charles (talk) 19:11, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support Not the most interesting landscape for me, but still nice, impressive and well done. I see no stitching issues. --Uoaei1 (talk) 17:34, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support Wows with its sheer sweep. The sort of landscape where you have to see it all. Daniel Case (talk) 18:10, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Oppose Just not that interesting or detailed. The 360 results in a very narrow strip (did you take the frames in landscape format?) with too little sky. 2000 vertical pixels is really quite small compared to the vertical resolution of your camera (4000). Quite a lot of muddy ground on the left and right edges. I think for a 360 image which naturally lacks any composition, the view has to be pretty spectacular. -- Colin (talk) 21:04, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
- Comment I can´t follow you. On the attractiveness of the landscape I have no influence. I have cropped top and buttom. What do you think is missing interesting in the lost sky and mud? The Large-Image-Template was already added. The 37 images in original size are difficult to work with and who wants seriously or is even able to upload an 126-MB image. Is sacrificing quality by strong compression for you ok? Just to see more sky and mud? --Milseburg (talk) 21:54, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /INeverCry 01:40, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Panoramas
