Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Panorama vom Simmelsberg im Winter.jpg

File:Panorama vom Simmelsberg im Winter.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Jun 2017 at 14:53:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Panorama vom Simmelsberg im Winter.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Panorama vom Simmelsberg im Winter.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Panoramas
•  Info Wintry panoramic view from the Simmelsberg in the Rhön Mountains in Hesse, Germany. See annotations for further description. All by me. -- Milseburg (talk) 14:53, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- Milseburg (talk) 14:53, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
•  Support - Beautiful, with great handling of light and shade and excellent focus. If this is a 360° view, please state that clearly in your file description. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:20, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

 Done This viewpoint offers 240°. --Milseburg (talk) 11:13, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

•  Support--LivioAndronico ^(talk) 22:00, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:57, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Neptuul (talk) 07:53, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Another one that makes me feel the ache in my calves. Daniel Case (talk) 16:20, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Daphne Lantier 20:55, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:33, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose The sunlit part of the town in the valley is nice. Most of the rest is under-exposed or simply not lit (yet) by the sun and is just too much dark forest. As a panorama, it is far far too narrow in height, resulting in an arbitrary crop at the bottom left-half, and an unnatural view of the world through a slit. The viewpoint and subject have great potential, but for taking a photo where the photographer has chosen to focus on something and select what part is interesting to see. -- Colin (talk) 12:00, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

I don't think it can be called a slit, because also in the hight it´s filling much more then 100% of the screen. Don't evaluate any preview. Further more I don´t agree that the image have to blown up with unimportant or uninteresting content such as simple snow on the bottom or empty blue sky at the top. The image don't want to select any elements to show but present them in the whole context as it can be seen from this viewpoint. See annotations what they are. --Milseburg (talk) 18:29, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Daphne Lantier 22:47, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Panoramas