Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sint Truiden, parochiekerk Sint-Maarten in straatzicht oeg22956 foto5 2015-06-09 12.02.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Sint Truiden, parochiekerk Sint-Maarten in straatzicht oeg22956 foto5 2015-06-09 12.02.jpg, not featured
[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Jan 2017 at 11:50:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings
Info created by Michielverbeek - uploaded by Michielverbeek - nominated by Michielverbeek -- Michielverbeek (talk) 11:50, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
Support -- Michielverbeek (talk) 11:50, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
Comment - Very good, but the top crop is a little close to the top of the spire. Do you have any room to extend the photo up further? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:01, 26 December 2016 (UTC) 
Done So I have made a total new development from RAW and I have left more space in top --Michielverbeek (talk) 11:36, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
Oppose The light is good and it's sharp and all but I find the composition a bit unbalanced. To me it's like some big hand had come in over the photo and shoved everything up towards the upper left, sorry. It would probaly have been better if you'd walked about 10 meters up the street, past the two flowerpots and shot from there. --cart-Talk 13:32, 26 December 2016 (UTC)- Oppose - I think the new version is a big improvement, but I also think I agree with cart about the plants in the flowerpots being a distraction. I feel like the plants extend too far into the seeming middle of the street (of course they don't, but that's how it looks to the viewer). The other form that distracts me is the woman walking in the viewer's direction, and I think it's mostly because of her gesture of bending down and looking at her handbag. So ultimately, I think this is a good picture but I'm not really feeling it as an FP. I think this church is featurable, though, so keep trying. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:42, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose When I approved this for QI, I wondered if we might yet see it at FP. While I can understand why, it didn't seem like a slam-dunk winner to me, and cart put her finger right on why it isn't. Daniel Case (talk) 06:40, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Thanks for comments --Michielverbeek (talk) 07:27, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /lNeverCry 07:31, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
