Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:St Francis of Assisi convent in Guimaraes (8).jpg

File:St Francis of Assisi convent in Guimaraes (8).jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Feb 2024 at 13:42:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:St Francis of Assisi convent in Guimaraes (8).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:St Francis of Assisi convent in Guimaraes (8).jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Portugal
•  Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 13:42, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
•  Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 13:42, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
•  Support ★ 14:32, 16 February 2024 (UTC) Per users below. ★ 10:23, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose Light, sharpness, subject, compo, none of those is IMHO outstanding Poco a poco (talk) 20:12, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose Agree on the light and sharpness. Composition is pretty good, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:48, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
•  Support Given the above comments I was expecting the sharpness at full size to be worse than this. I understand and respect the above votes but IMO this is fine for a 19 megapixel photo of a very interesting motif. Cmao20 (talk) 12:21, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

 Weak support Sharpness might not be the best, but I find it just on the side of tolerable and I think the light is fitting for the subject which I also find interesting — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kritzolina (talk • contribs) 15:15, 17 February 2024‎ (UTC)

•  Support Юрий Д.К 19:48, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Ikan Kekek. -- Karelj (talk) 20:52, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Poco. The upper part, half here, half off, makes the composition unbalanced in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:13, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
•  I withdraw my nomination --Tournasol7 (talk) 05:25, 18 February 2024 (UTC)