Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tableau 24 Abdih - Hiddisch by Karl Bodmer.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Aug 2014 at 20:18:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Karl Bodmer - uploaded by Michael Gäbler - nominated by Michael Gäbler -- Michael Gäbler (talk) 20:18, 8 August 2014 (UTC)- Info The NONAM, Nordamerika Native Museum - Indianer und Inuit Kulturen, Zürich, Switzerland gave this file as a present to the wikimedia commons.
Support -- Michael Gäbler (talk) 20:18, 8 August 2014 (UTC)- Support Good and interesting. Yann (talk) 07:10, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
- Support high ev --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:11, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
Strong oppose File:A Minatarre chief 0057v edit.jpg is far better.--Claus (talk) 10:10, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
- I do not understand what in File:A Minatarre chief 0057v edit.jpg is supposed to be far better. The image was subsequently edited to Commons. It lost the color of the paper and received a blue cast. Comparisons of to an unprocessed image by Karl Bodmer of the image source Library of Congress like your image but with right colours: File:Dacota_woman_and_Assiniboin_girl_0042v.jpg. --Michael Gäbler (talk) 15:51, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose What is the individual contribution of the photographer here? IMHO it is not very challenging to take a photo from a book page. --Tuxyso (talk) 08:06, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
- Is that a reason for opposing? --G Furtado (talk) 19:41, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
- Exactly. I know that this position in controversal. But I see no reason to support a photo of a book page, sorry. What is excellent here? Probably Martin Falbisoner is right that the EV is high (I am no expert on art). Given that this book page is an VP but no FP. --Tuxyso (talk) 21:32, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
- The NONAM, North America Native Museum - Indian and Inuit cultures, Zurich, Switzerland owns this image of Karl Bodmer. The photographer of the museum made a photographic reproduction of this image. The NONAM bestows commons the right to publish the reproduction with all legal consequences. You see: this reproduction is not a photo from a book page. It is a photographic reproduction of the original. --Michael Gäbler (talk) 23:01, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
- Exactly. I know that this position in controversal. But I see no reason to support a photo of a book page, sorry. What is excellent here? Probably Martin Falbisoner is right that the EV is high (I am no expert on art). Given that this book page is an VP but no FP. --Tuxyso (talk) 21:32, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
- Is that a reason for opposing? --G Furtado (talk) 19:41, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose per above Jiel (talk) 22:39, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination --Michael Gäbler (talk) 15:54, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
