Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Immaculate Conception, by Giovanni Battista Tiepolo, from Prado in Google Earth.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:The Immaculate Conception, by Giovanni Battista Tiepolo, from Prado in Google Earth.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Jun 2011 at 20:21:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Giovanni Battista Tiepolo - uploaded by Dcoetzee - nominated by Tomer T (talk) 20:21, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 20:21, 18 June 2011 (UTC)- Support Most likely showing my ignorance here, but I'm curious what the glowing blue arch is in the background. The strange square lines up on the top left and top right make me think something was removed (from the actual painting). – Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies 07:12, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
- Support Ilke the composition of the painting... --Llorenzi (talk) 11:27, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
Oppose What should we "feature" here ?
- -The painting ? Matter of taste. Not mine, sorry. And I'm not sure with the real colors (see other "official" versions in the file description page).
- -The painter ? "Congratulations Mr. Tiepolo, please nominate other pictures of yours" ?
- -The photographical technics and settings ? Mr Google-the-robot photographer ? Oh yes, "he" has a better camera than mine, no doubt...
- -The size ? Unnecessary detailed IMO. It looks like a moon landscape, or an ethiopian ground in summer, on my screen.--Jebulon (talk) 14:53, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
- Support --Claus (talk) 15:04, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose Well, since we do not have an accurate point of comparison with regards to color, we could be nominating a wrongful representation. Pictures of works of art should be done with utmost care and technical proficiency. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 16:40, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
- Support Yann (talk) 08:33, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
- Support High-quality reproduction of an historically important artwork of high artistic merit, meets criteria outlined at Commons:Featured picture candidates#Artworks, illustrations, and historical documents. About the colours, sure, the version at museodelprado.es has somewhat brighter colours, but the google maps collection from which this one was taken was also produced and endorsed by the same museum, so there is no issue of deciding which of the two is the more "correct" (from what I gather, with these kinds of paintings, there may really be no such thing as a "correct" colouring, since it's always heavily dependent on lighting conditions). Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:20, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
- Support Lol moon landing. IMO the more detail the better from an education perspective. -- One, please. ( Thank you.) 08:27, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
- Support Hydrel (talk) 16:13, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 22:07, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media
