Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Urban two-storey wooden house.png

File:Urban two-storey wooden house.png, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2016 at 23:39:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Urban two-storey wooden house.png Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Urban two-storey wooden house.png

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Computer-generated
•  Info Absolute majority wooden houses in Russia are log hut. The house is planked with boards because it is located within the city limits. Widely used pierced work and overhead decorative elements. This house is located in Perm. Сreated by Vladimir Litvinov (architect, designer) — uploaded by Vladimir Litvinov — nominated by Niklitov — Niklitov (talk) 23:39, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Support — Niklitov (talk) 23:39, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment - No offense, I hope, but I'm having trouble finding the "wow" in this diagram and would rather see a photo of the house in question. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:43, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Very typical russian house, cant miss those curvatures. From Užgorod to Vladivostok. --Mile (talk) 18:00, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Support lNeverCry 08:11, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Support per Mile; I recall seeing plenty of these vernacular houses during my tragically-shortened trip to Perm years ago. Daniel Case (talk) 04:00, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

•  Question - What happened, if you don't mind my asking? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:08, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

• Dear Ikan Kekek! I'm sorry, I didn't understand the question: photos of the house are included (other versions). This reconstruction for architects who want to repair the house. — Niklitov (talk) 09:32, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

• You didn't understand the question because it was for Daniel Case. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:33, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

• But you know what? I get your point, anyway. This is a very high-resolution and educationally/functionally/encyclopedically useful picture.  Support after all. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:13, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

•  Support -- Zcebeci (talk) 06:18, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Nice and useful. --Yann (talk) 00:37, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Mile (talk) 08:45, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media/Computer-generated