Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Val-d'Orcia-landscape-1.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Val-d'Orcia-landscape-1.jpg, not featured
[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Sep 2012 at 02:32:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created & uploaded by Hans A. Rosbach - nominated by Raoli -- raul (talk) 02:32, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Support -- raul (talk) 02:32, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Neutral: It's really close to an excellent image, but the composition is a little weird with the top of the tree being cut off and the left area somehow feeling too narrow (not sure why, though). Also has some CA on the bottom and the sharpness isn't perfect. --Julian H. (talk/files) 11:50, 31 August 2012 (UTC)- Support Albertus teolog (talk) 12:59, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Oppose Per Julian H.'s arguments, but I think the cut off of the tree is really too unfortunate. To me, it is sufficient for a "decline" vote, as it seems that another composition was possible to avoid this issue (less ground at bottom = more tree at top). Sorry. Though not far to an excellent image indeed.--Jebulon (talk) 14:29, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Comment Unfortunately I haven't found a picture of the same landscape that has a better cut. The image is a typical summer Tuscan landscape with hills and cypresses. Raoli ✉ (talk) 15:36, 31 August 2012 (UTC)- Comment I'm the author of the picture. I think it is good, and I like it, but I don't think it is excellent. In fact I returned to the same place, I think it was a year later, hoping to improve on this shot, just the way Jebulon indicates. I would probably have made an attempt to include more of the field at the left too. I could however, not even have made this one at that time. I have made an attempt at cropping this just above the second tree, and just below the bottom of the first, but I'm not convinced. Haros (talk) 06:39, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
- Comment You could use other shots of the same picture to make it better. Perhaps, merging multiple photos can bring in something nicer. Raoli ✉ (talk) 09:45, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose The cro is not convincing, and impo the picture is not that sharp. --Yikrazuul (talk) 16:02, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:39, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
