Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vista panorámica de Bratislava, Eslovaquia, 2020-02-01, DD 50-55 PAN.jpg

File:Vista panorámica de Bratislava, Eslovaquia, 2020-02-01, DD 50-55 PAN.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2020 at 15:42:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Vista panorámica de Bratislava, Eslovaquia, 2020-02-01, DD 50-55 PAN.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vista panorámica de Bratislava, Eslovaquia, 2020-02-01, DD 50-55 PAN.jpg

3610

35

8447

3597

13820

3649

I think a composition more or less like this would be more compelling.

570

17

13112

3614

13820

3649

suggested crop by KoH

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Slovakia
•  Info Panoramic view of Bratislava from the Bratislava Castle, Slovakia. The metropolitan area of Slovakia's capital comprises a about 660.000 inhab., about 12% of the country's population. c/u/n by me, Poco a poco (talk) 15:42, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 15:42, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment Very similar as Belgrade. Photo could be redone, highlights on left could get some color back. Something like. But i would do from the original file. --Mile (talk) 10:16, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support This photo deserves some more love. The light, while not extraordinary, is soft, gentle and attractive, and the image quality is super, with lots of sharp and interesting details to explore. Cmao20 (talk) 11:59, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Good but not that spectacular, and the background is hazy. I think a subset of this motif that extends from the 3rd modern tower to the left of the church to a bit right of the bridge would be more compelling as a composition, so I'll mark it, but I think less haziness would be needed for me to support a nomination. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:50, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

• Ikan Kekek: I applied a crop but a slight one (see KoH suggestion) and I also reduced the haziness (among other changes) Poco a poco (talk) 12:39, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment I would actually suggest a different, less aggressive crop than Ikan (see annotation). The tree in the top left corner is distracting, so I'd like to remove it while keeping as much of the left side as possible. A slight refinement on the right side would also be beneficial, as there is a little bit of wasted space there. But I feel Ikan's approach would frame the main subjects too tightly. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:15, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

• King of Hearts: I've opted for your crop (among other changes), I agree with your judgement Poco a poco (talk) 12:39, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

•  Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:19, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

•  Oppose per Ikan. A valiant attempt to take a winter cityscape without snow, but the light is just too harsh and direct at the left. Daniel Case (talk) 05:08, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

• Daniel Case: I've reduced the hightlights on the left (among other changes) Poco a poco (talk) 12:39, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

 Very weak support now. Daniel Case (talk) 16:34, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment Big improvement. I'll deliberate. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:46, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

  So, Ikan Kekek, what is the result of your deliberation? the clock is ticking :) Poco a poco (talk) 12:06, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

•  Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:11, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Mile (talk) 10:19, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:23, 20 November 2020 (UTC)