Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Zürich view Quaibrücke 20200702.jpg

File:Zürich view Quaibrücke 20200702.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Oct 2020 at 08:39:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Zürich view Quaibrücke 20200702.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Zürich view Quaibrücke 20200702.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Switzerland
•  Info created by Domob - uploaded by Domob - nominated by Domob -- Domob (talk) 08:39, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment This is (in my opinion) one of the best views of the old town of Zurich, containing many of the important landmarks at once (Grossmünster, Fraumünster, St. Peter, Limmat), and this high-resolution panorama is the best picture we have of this particular view. There's one existing other FP of the old town of Zurich from the Grossmünster; this one is also very nice, but does not show the landmarks all together. --Domob (talk) 08:39, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Domob (talk) 08:39, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Support per nomination --Cmao20 (talk) 09:59, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Milseburg (talk) 13:29, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Great detail! I am a bit unsure about the white balance (maybe a bit warmer and a bit more in the magenta direction could make it even more appealing?), but that’s a matter of taste, of course. --Aristeas (talk) 07:31, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Support per Aristeas, although after thinking about it I wonder if your idea was to emulate the look of a postcard, because that's the vibe I get from this WB? If so carry on ... Daniel Case (talk) 02:55, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment That's an interesting thought, but to be honest, wasn't my intention. So if you and Aristeas think the WB could be improved, I can certainly give it a try and make it a bit warmer. If I find some time, I'll prepare an alternative. --Domob (talk) 04:21, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment Yes, IMHO it would really be worth to try a bit warmer WB. If the changes are not dramatic, it is (AFAIK) not necessary to provide an alternative version for FPC; just upload the new version and state that you have changed it. --Aristeas (talk) 06:49, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Done I've updated the file with a slightly warmer WB. --Domob (talk) 12:17, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Support --Llez (talk) 05:15, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Support That small change made the difference for me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:21, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose WB still looks strange, now too warm and a bit greenish. The right side is clearly leaning to the right, The composition, as it is, guides the eye to the middle of the image, where I just see a bunch of cranes. If you fix the WB and above all the perspective issue, I will reconsider my vote Poco a poco (talk) 21:00, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Done Fixed the verticals on the right, and less yellowish/warm WB. --Domob (talk) 09:14, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

• Now we're talking, this version is definitely better, but the pinnacle of the church is still tilted. Fix that and I strike through my vote Poco a poco (talk) 10:02, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

•  Oppose The WB is wrong. Yellowish now -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:03, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

• Better now -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:58, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:54, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Switzerland