Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Dune Flickr Rosino December 30 2005 Morocco Africa.jpg

Info created by Rosino (Flickr user) - uploaded by Quasipalm - nominated by Arria Belli. Arria Belli | parlami 02:14, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lovely, hypnotic photo. Arria Belli | parlami 02:14, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral kind of grainy close up IMO. --[[Anonymous Dissident]] 04:38, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I see it too. In the shadowy part there is really a lot of noise (that's not just sand, is it?), and I see a bright halo following the outline of the dunes, maybe oversharpened? Otherwise very nice athmosphere, so if this could be fixed, I'd like to support. --JDrewes 18:26, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - Comment Yeah, indeed, oversharp was another word I was looking for. I would support too if this were somehow fixed. --[[Anonymous Dissident]] 18:46, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support, it's not grainy, it's sharp. --Aqwis 16:02, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Sand is naturally grainy :) Can you fix the dust spots? One at the centre on the bottom edge, and a fainter one at the top of the sky directly over the v of the horizon.
Support--AngMoKio 20:44, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer 21:41, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Karelj 22:10, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Terrific picture, compressed too much though. Dori - Talk 22:27, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral - Husky ^{(talk to me)} 22:43, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Support Distracting almost white thin line in boubdary between dunes and sky (postprocessing artefact?) overcompensated by wow -- Slaunger 23:25, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- - Comment Agreed. Exceptional image. Suggest lighter handed processing to original.--Wrspiers 06:17, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I looked to see the thin white line and saw what I think are clone errors. Red outlines the real obvious ones, yellow is around some less obvious. -- carol 09:55, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Actually, taking artistic-looking photos of dunes is not difficult. This composition shows little imagination. WolfmanSF 04:06, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - The composition is almost trivial and there are technical problems: the white line and the noise in the shadows - Alvesgaspar 12:04, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Noise in the shadow and oversharpening halos need fixing, see above. --JDrewes 15:25, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I think the composition is not good, as the shadow zone is not well centered even on a third -Theklan 16:39, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too many problems as discussed above. --MichaelMaggs 18:58, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support its a bit noisy --Richard Bartz 00:36, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose ack Richard Bartz. Lycaon 07:23, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

CommentTo me, this image has everything with the exception of the noise in the shadows that was mentioned.-- carol 11:51, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tbc 21:00, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Pudelek 22:55, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Merlijn 10:37, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per the technical problems mentioned. Rocket000 04:42, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Beautiful --Booksworm 15:25, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

result: 11 Support, 7 Oppose, 3 Neutral => not featured. Simonizer 09:33, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Navigation menu