Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Chelidonichthys lucernus 1 Luc viatour.jpg

Image:Chelidonichthys lucernus 1 Luc viatour.jpg, not featured

•  Info created by Luc Viatour (talk) - uploaded by Luc Viatour (talk) - nominated by -- Luc Viatour (talk) 13:32, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
•  Support -- Luc Viatour (talk) 13:32, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose Delightful composition, subject and colours but sadly very noisy. Lycaon (talk) 13:42, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
  • It is very difficult to photograph in water or in an aquarium because the light is low or water creates defects! It is an image of 3600 x 2000 it is possible to reduce and still have a beautiful image --Luc Viatour (talk) 14:19, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
•  Support -- FieldMarine (talk) 16:43, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose That is great picture of a fish. I'd like to support it, but the noise ruins it totally. --Aktron (talk) 18:33, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Le bruit est minime si l'on considère la taille de l'image. Très impressionnant. --S23678 (talk) 15:42, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Wow is definitely there. Barabas (talk) 19:28, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
•  Neutral A great aquarium shot. Love the colors and detail on the fish. But the image is too noisy, as others have said. -- TheWB (talk) 01:30, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
•  Support this Fish! :) --Pauk (talk) 10:28, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose Should not be hard to remove some of the noise, but until then I oppose. /Daniel78 (talk) 18:12, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
•  Support 2200 ISO... and it shows ! I'm surprised you had to go this high (but don't really know how lit was the aquarium). Fortunately you had a D300. Still a super catch to me ! Benh (talk) 21:42, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose Heavy noise, CA, motion blur. –Dilaudid 12:48, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
•  Support --Karelj (talk) 13:32, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
•  Neutral Great picture, but it's a bit too blurry. --RoFra (talk) 17:17, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

result: 7 supports, 4 opposes, 2 neutrals => not featured. Benh (talk) 15:18, 12 August 2008 (UTC)