Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Closeup of snail in fishtank.jpg

Compare to this featured snail, I think they have the same standard. From OpenPhoto, Nominate

by pfctdayelise (translate?) 12:23, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Support —pfctdayelise (translate?) 12:23, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Lerdsuwa 14:46, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support amazing detail on the front, although I wish more of the photo was in focus. -Quasipalm 20:07, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Francisco M. Marzoa 00:24, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose overexposed, depth of field is too narrow, which is not necessary for such a slow object Pjotr 10:30, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose ack Pjotr, f/2.8 is not recommendable in this case. MGo 12:23, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support, I agree with Quasipalm. Thryduulf 16:50, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - I think this one is better. YolanC 22:34, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Urban 03:40, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - not a lot of use without the species identification. And agree with YolanC. - MPF 14:24, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Romary 10:37, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice detail Miskatonic 17:25, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
SupportAnna reg 10:36, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support unusual perspective! A.J. 09:58, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - ID is missing, therefor unusable for encyclopedic articles. Taka 05:39, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

9 support, 6 oppose --> not featured Roger McLassus 13:32, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Navigation menu