Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Szent Ilona kápolna Teskánd Zalaegerszeg.JPG
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Image:Szent Ilona kápolna Teskánd Zalaegerszeg.JPG, not featured
[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Aug 2017 at 13:01:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Zalaegerszeg
Info created by Nxr-at - uploaded by Nxr-at - nominated by Nxr-at -- Nxr-at (talk) 13:01, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
Support -- Nxr-at (talk) 13:01, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
Comment I think the church needs perspective correction; otherwise, the image is comopositionally striking and of high quality.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 15:46, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
Oppose Too dark (for 15:50 July). The grass shouldn't be that colour in daylight I think. Either under-exposed or badly processed. Could do with being saved with an embedded colour profile too. Wrt the "perspective correction", I don't think this is going to be possible as the photo was shot too close to the church and the resulting distortion would be too much. I don't think, even with light-level fixes, this is comparable with FP level for churches. -- Colin (talk) 16:57, 1 August 2017 (UTC)- Oppose Obviously too dark and unnatural. I think the image wasn't edited in Lightroom or Photoshop yet and still has that ugly darkness which sometimes happens when you are photographing with Nikon DSLR in sunlight. If it was captured in RAW, then I think it can be easily solved. For now complete oppose. -- Pofka (talk) 19:11, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose as per others. Daphne Lantier 19:15, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose The light isn't too bad, but shadows need lightening. Perspective must be corrected a bit and the sky needs denoising. If you can fix all of this I might change my vote but as it is, no.--Peulle (talk) 20:21, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose - There's also a dust spot above the left side of the tree, though that should be an easy fix. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:40, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
