Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/File:Wind Point Lighthouse 071104.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

File:Wind Point Lighthouse 071104.jpg (delist)[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Apr 2020 at 12:42:57
SHORT DESCRIPTION

  •  Info The current FP doesn't have proper white balance. The replacement fixes that. The newer one doesn't fix completely the chromatic aberration though, but better than nothing I guess... (Original nomination)
  •  Delist and replace by File:Wind Point Lighthouse.png -- pandakekok9 12:42, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep I don't see the point of going in with more modern programs and "fix" old FP's this way. They have the look that was considered ok back then. --Cart (talk) 12:51, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Abstain This was taken in warm winter afternoon light, so the warm tint does look entirely reasonable to me. In any case, the whole picture (regardless of version) is kind of meh by today's standards and I probably wouldn't support either version today. I'd say either keep it as it is or delist it completely … --El Grafo (talk) 13:56, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment - All I see at a quick look is a bit of a difference in tone that doesn't seem worth bothering with. Is there anything else I should be looking for? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:26, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The new version seems pretty similar to the old version except with slightly darker shadows and a slightly bluer overall tone. Not a big enough change for me to consider it a clear improvement, I'm not sure the warm colour of the original is necessarily wrong. As for the original pic, it wouldn't pass today but I think it's pretty good overall, it's a nice lighthouse under sunny light and with good sharpness. I don't think there's any need to delist it. Cmao20 (talk) 18:55, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep -- no point in replacing by a PNG that is hardly better, if not even worse. --A.Savin 21:13, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The old version is fine. As a side note, a PNG is not preferred as it loses more useful information than a max-quality JPEG; I would much rather have the EXIF data than nearly imperceptible pixel perfection. -- King of 01:38, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  •  I withdraw my nomination It seems this still deserves to be an FP. --pandakekok9 01:52, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]