Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/Image:Phyllodoce lineata.jpg

===Image:Phyllodoce lineata.jpg===, not delisted Voting period : from 5 Nov 2008 to 14 Nov 2008 (included)

•  Info Far too small, noisy and unsharp (Original nomination)
•  Delist -- Noodle snacks (talk) 07:59, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
•  Keep It might be a small picture, but it still is a great one. It was featured with a reason. I wouldn't feature it today with the knowledge of the resolution of today's cameras, but since it was elected in the past it mitigates the size. --Massimo Catarinella (talk) 22:02, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

Why wouldn't you feature it today? Are you saying that people, who cannot afford good cameras, but still take "great" (your words) images have not a chance to make their images featured, even if the images are rare, unique and available only in a low resolution? It is just a w:Rhetorical question--Mbz1 (talk) 03:41, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

•  Keep Image esthétique et surtout techniquement difficile. Sujet encyclopédique et rare. Merci à Lycaon pour cette image --Luc Viatour (talk) 07:26, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
•  Comment Rare, encyclopedic, interesting, but also an easy (dead) subject with only half of it shown on the image. BTW, if this image were taken by somebody else, Lycaon would have been the first one to support delisting nomination.Sorry, Hans, could not resist.--Mbz1 (talk) 00:40, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
•  Keep /Daniel78 (talk) 00:40, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
• Keep Good for underwater pictures.--Mr. Mario (talk) 14:43, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
•  Keep Aesthetic and encyclopedic. I am against any delisting that denies previous obvious supportings. Let's show consideration for historical construction of Commons. Otherwise in five years we could delist all present pictures. Though that's a shame Hans there is no article yet about this species even in vlaams --B.navez (talk) 08:33, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
  •  Comment - Wow, someone who shares my view on the historical construction of Commons FP! I think we are the only two cruzaders left... Alvesgaspar (talk) 16:31, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
    •  Comment For the record, I too agree on this. An image promoted in 2008 should not be delisted in 2018 because it's not up to standards then. I think such an image should be considered as a "FP of 2008" with all what that means in terms of existing technology and standards./Daniel78 (talk) 17:02, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
      •  Comment That's what I'm trying to say in the above. --Massimo Catarinella (talk) 21:16, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
•  Keep --Richard Bartz (talk) 15:24, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
•  Keep --Manco Capac (talk) 12:12, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
•  Keep   ■ MMXX^talk  17:06, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
•  Keep --Mbdortmund (talk) 16:55, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

result: 1 delist, 9 keep, 0 neutral => not delisted--Massimo Catarinella (talk) 23:07, 14 November 2008 (UTC)