Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives April 03 2021
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination Ice crystals on a barbed wire in Hausdülmen, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:57, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:05, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Grave of “Elisabeth von Hatzfeld” at Hörster Cemetery, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:57, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:05, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Matchstick just extinguished --XRay 03:57, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:01, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Paradise portal of St Paul's Cathedral (in the light of the rising sun), Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:57, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:01, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Structures on a dead tree on the loop around Vischering Castle in Lüdinghausen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:57, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:01, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Footbridge at the mouth of the Tiebel, Steindorf am Ossiacher See, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:46, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 03:58, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Footbridge at the mouth of the Tiebel, Steindorf am Ossiacher See, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:46, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 03:58, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mouth of the Tiebel, Steindorf am Ossiacher See, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:46, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 03:58, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mouth of the Tiebel, Steindorf am Ossiacher See, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:46, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:01, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cygnus olor at the Bleistätter Moor on Dammweg, Steindorf am Ossiacher See, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:46, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:01, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Snowbirds (This image was nominated before, but never reviewed) Angry Red Hammer Guy 19:49, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Not enough detail IMO --MB-one 21:14, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cultivar of Primula in Jardins de la Fontaine in Nîmes, Gard, France. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 19:44, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 20:52, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Building No 10 (Prüfstand) of Incubation and Business Center (Triple Z) in Essen photographed from parking lot side --Tuxyso 18:39, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 18:46, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Building No 10 (Prüfstand) of Incubation and Business Center (Triple Z) in Essen --Tuxyso 18:39, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 20:13, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tiger (m) (Panthera tigris tigris) drinking, Mudumalai National Park, India --Tagooty 15:19, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 16:59, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tiger (m) (Panthera tigris tigris) resting in the shade, Mudumalai National Park, India --Tagooty 15:19, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 16:59, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Watering hole, Mudumalai National Park, India --Tagooty 15:19, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 17:33, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Female elephant with calf (Elephas maximus indicus), Mudumalai National Park, India --Tagooty 15:19, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 16:03, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Brown thrasher in the Central Park Shakespeare Garden --Rhododendrites 13:09, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. Nice :) --LexKurochkin 13:15, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination American tree sparrow in Central Park --Rhododendrites 13:09, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. Nice bird --LexKurochkin 13:16, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Yellow-bellied sapsucker in Central Park --Rhododendrites 13:09, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:21, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Greater white-fronted goose in Central Park --Rhododendrites 13:09, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:21, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Northern cardinal male in Central Park --Rhododendrites 13:09, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 13:17, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View of a building which will be demolished in the near future. --PantheraLeo1359531 11:21, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 13:06, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Daisies (Leucanthemum) and a wasp in a flower garden (Quesnel, BC) --Trougnouf 10:56, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion OK for me --PantheraLeo1359531 12:03, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A construction site in Selb. --PantheraLeo1359531 10:43, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ximonic 12:37, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A construction site in Selb. --PantheraLeo1359531 10:38, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ximonic 12:37, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A construction site in Selb. --PantheraLeo1359531 10:33, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Neither from compositional view (excavator is cut, too much foreground) nor from aesthetic view a nice photo, but QI for me :) --Tuxyso 18:50, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wayside cross (1669), so-called "Unfallkreuz", in Trier-Ehrang. --Palauenc05 10:12, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Jmh2o 10:58, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wayside cross (1669), so-called "Unfallkreuz", in Trier-Ehrang. --Palauenc05 10:12, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --PantheraLeo1359531 12:04, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Blue gentian on the lower Gratsee
--F. Riedelio 10:04, 31 March 2021 (UTC) - Promotion QI for me. --Tuxyso 19:04, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Blue gentian on the lower Gratsee
-
- Nomination The blue Mediterranean near Mallorca
--F. Riedelio 10:04, 31 March 2021 (UTC) - Promotion QI for me. --Tuxyso 18:56, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination The blue Mediterranean near Mallorca
-
- Nomination Bud of a blue iris
--F. Riedelio 10:04, 31 March 2021 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality --PantheraLeo1359531 12:08, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Bud of a blue iris
-
- Nomination A construction site in Selb. --PantheraLeo1359531 09:57, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion QI for me. --Tuxyso 18:53, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Buiding on Via Avogadro in Brescia. --Moroder 09:27, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 09:29, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Buiding on Via Avogadro in Brescia. East side. --Moroder 08:58, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quailty. --GT1976 09:26, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 09:28, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View of the Nouveau Siècle, Lille, France --Velvet 08:01, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 09:30, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dettaglio di un arazzo fiammingo del sedicesimo secolo, conservato nel palazzo Borromeo sull'Isola Bella. --GattoCeliaco 07:24, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 07:41, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Anas platyrhynchos (Male) --Commonists 07:13, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 07:45, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Charlesjsharp 10:18, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Saint Martin church in Golinhac, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 05:48, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:09, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Town hall of Cromac, Haute-Vienne, France. --Tournasol7 05:48, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 06:21, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Windows of the Saint Leodegar church in Saint-Léger-Magnazeix, Haute-Vienne, France. --Tournasol7 05:48, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Commonists 07:14, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bell tower of the St Roch church in Castaillac, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 05:48, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 07:50, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Vineyard cottage, Weingarten, Baden, Germany --Llez 05:13, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:49, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination De Dobbe Gelle (stadholders pit). Location: Kroondomein Het Loo.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:26, 31 March 2021 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:59, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination De Dobbe Gelle (stadholders pit). Location: Kroondomein Het Loo.
-
- Nomination Eilandbrug (Type Tuibrug) in Overijssel. Bridge in the N50 over the IJssel.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:26, 31 March 2021 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:59, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Eilandbrug (Type Tuibrug) in Overijssel. Bridge in the N50 over the IJssel.
-
- Nomination Rue Stéphane Mallarmé in Nîmes, Gard, France. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 20:43, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Llez 05:15, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sculpture over the window of the Hôtel de Lagorce in Nîmes, Gard, France. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 20:43, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 09:39, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Castellum Divisorium in Nîmes, Gard, France. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 20:43, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 09:40, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A view of Moskva River, Tower 2000 and Bagration Bridge --LexKurochkin 19:47, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 06:23, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Moscow North River Terminal in winter --Mike1979 Russia 14:05, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Nice, but unfortunately out of focus. --A.Savin 08:19, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Thank you. --Mike1979 Russia 09:35, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Car bumper abandoned in Parco Alto Milanese, Italy.--Mænsard vokser 09:19, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 13:08, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Livgardens kaserne, rosenborg slot. --GattoCeliaco 07:38, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Interesting photo, but not sharp enough. Sorry --LexKurochkin 13:12, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gravestone in the Church of St. Bartholomew in Kirchehrenbach --Ermell 07:37, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality, interesting subject --LexKurochkin 09:44, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Anas platyrhynchos (Male) --Commonists 21:26, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Unfortunately strange structures on the duck. Can you reprocess the image? --PantheraLeo1359531 13:29, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Can you leave a note,please? Thanks --Commonists 14:09, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Support Good quality. I don't see any strange structures --Charlesjsharp 10:20, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination So-called White Cross
--F. Riedelio 14:50, 29 March 2021 (UTC) - Decline
Oppose Not sharp. Sorry. --Ermell 20:14, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination --F. Riedelio 09:09, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination So-called White Cross
-
- Nomination Two-part leadlight in the Parish Church St. Ulrich
--F. Riedelio 14:50, 29 March 2021 (UTC) - Decline
Oppose Sorry, a nice shot but noise and sharpness are issues on this one. --Rhododendrites 13:44, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination --F. Riedelio 09:10, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Two-part leadlight in the Parish Church St. Ulrich
-
- Nomination Bust of Caracalla at The Feodor Dostoevsky restaurant in Saint Petersburg, Vladimirskiy prospekt 9I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --Reda Kerbouche 21:09, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment It's rather noisy -- try another process. --A.Savin 01:03, 29 March 2021 (UTC) @A.Savin: Done.--Reda Kerbouche 11:53, 30 March 2021 (UTC) OK. --A.Savin 08:22, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Former Mount of Olives Chapel at the Parish Church of St. Ulrich
--F. Riedelio 09:27, 28 March 2021 (UTC) Request It's QI, but I'd like a much more specific file description and please ad also the EXIF data to your candidates (It's up to you but many reviewers prefer it). One more thing, please separate each candidate with an empty line upon entry. Thanks --Moroder 11:28, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
New version Specific file description please see Captions, Structured data and Summary. For privacy reasons, only the necessary EXIF metadata has been included so far. --F. Riedelio 08:01, 29 March 2021 (UTC) Comment The description is very confounding and the main object in the foto, the pietà, is not mentioned at all. I don't understand the privacy issue regarding EXIF data --Moroder 14:07, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Comment The description refers to the entire cultural monument. The information about the specific photo is included in the "File Information" and in bold in the "Summary". The EXIF data also contains my home address (probably from the IPTC data). --F. Riedelio 07:30, 30 March 2021 (UTC) - Promotion I don't insist but your description is misleading and IMHO not in line with guidlines. As I said EXIF data could help reviewers but for sure I don't want to know your home adress --Moroder 18:52, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Former Mount of Olives Chapel at the Parish Church of St. Ulrich
-
- Nomination Building at 28 boulevard Gambetta in Nîmes, Gard, France. (By Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 17:25, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Some CA in the branches should be removed. --Ermell 20:34, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
New version uploaded, Tournasol7 13:13, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:24, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Saint Charles church in Nîmes, Gard, France. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 21:17, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Air Creation Tanarg at AERO Friedrichshafen 2018 --MB-one 20:50, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Weak support There is thin blue fringing in upper right part of image (near the windows) but IMO it is a QI, considering image size. --LexKurochkin 16:23, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Im Naturschutzgebiet "Binnendünen Nordoe" --Nightflyer 20:34, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Sorry, but the image looks Overprocessed, visible artefacts, details are lost --LexKurochkin 16:18, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: New York aster (Symphyotrichum novi-belgii) at the Florence Nightingalepark, The Hague, October 2004. By User:TeunSpaans --Charlestpt 08:38, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
- Review
Not very sharp + the inflorescence is located too much to the right of the image. --Nefronus 17:17, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View from Tete du Vuargne in commune of Verchaix, Haute-Savoie, France. --Tournasol7 06:11, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Question Is it a panorama? If it is, please desribe it as a panorama. --LexKurochkin 13:16, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
Done, Tournasol7 06:00, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Support Thanks! Good quality, nice place. --LexKurochkin 15:49, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ladies View, Killarney National Park. --Lion-hearted85 23:58, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --IamMM 10:42, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Vegetation in Manno, Switzerland --Commonists 20:30, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --IamMM 10:42, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Village center of Brouilla, France. --Palauenc05 12:50, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Moroder 19:01, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gentiana clusii at Lac de Tavaneuse in Abondance, Haute-Savoie, France. --Tournasol7 06:09, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good Quality. --F. Riedelio 09:29, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Building at 21 rue des Orangers in Nîmes, Gard, France. (By Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 22:48, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Sorry: The tree hides the object for the most part. --F. Riedelio 09:26, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The nature of the forest in Neuenburg. --PantheraLeo1359531 13:24, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Cropping a bit from the top you could avoid the blown highlights. --Ermell 16:00, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
Done Thx, fixed --PantheraLeo1359531 12:13, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:25, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Almunecar --Kallerna 09:04, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- Review
Hazy, too little contrast. --F. Riedelio 14:48, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
Consensual review[edit]
File:Szczecinek_Bus_Map_(1993).svg[edit]
- Nomination Daytime and night network of Bus Map in Szczecinek (Poland) at 1993 y. --Maciek r. drewniak 07:07, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Comment I think such image should be in SVG format. --Mike1979 Russia 07:18, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
- New version I changed and uploded new version of that image in SVG format. --Maciek r. drewniak 10:33, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support Good work. --Mike1979 Russia 14:35, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
- Done I uploaded this one with higher resolution. --Maciek r. drewniak 06:58, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted --LexKurochkin 17:30, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
File:Szczecinek_Bus_Map_(1990).svg[edit]
- Nomination Daytime and night network of Bus Map in Szczecinek (Poland) at 1990 y. --Maciek r. drewniak 07:07, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Comment I think such image should be in SVG format. --Mike1979 Russia 07:18, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
- New version I changed and uploded new version of that image in SVG format. --Maciek r. drewniak 10:33, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
- Comment What about not converting the fonts to paths? It could work well with some of the sans fonts available on Commons. The size would be significantly reduced. --Nefronus 11:48, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Fonts've been changed onto curves becouse in other languages there would be a problem with Polish signs. --Maciek r. drewniak 12:35, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
- Comment What about not converting the fonts to paths? It could work well with some of the sans fonts available on Commons. The size would be significantly reduced. --Nefronus 11:48, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
- New version I changed and uploded new version of that image in SVG format. --Maciek r. drewniak 10:33, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support Good work. I think size is normal for vector. You can change it as you like. --Mike1979 Russia 14:35, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
- Done I uploaded this one with higher resolution. --Maciek r. drewniak 07:00, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted --LexKurochkin 17:30, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
File:Hawk_cuckoo_front_Mudumalai_Mar21_DSC01233.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Common hawk-cuckoo (Hierococcyx varius) front, Mudumalai National Park, India --Tagooty 02:40, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:24, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose I disagree. poor quality --Charlesjsharp 12:22, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Unsharp/noisy. -- Ikan Kekek 06:43, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
- Weak Support. Looks like a rather difficult lighting situation. Considering the obviously required high ISO setting, the result is actually surprisingly good. Printing on A4 is possible in usable quality. --Smial 09:24, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Charlesjsharp. I think there are better pictures of the bird in the category not candidating for QI. —Nefronus 19:32, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined --LexKurochkin 17:31, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
File:Indian_roller_perching_Mudumalai_Mar21_DSC01236.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Indian roller (Coracias benghalensis), Mudumalai National Park, India --Tagooty 02:40, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:24, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose I disagree. poor quality --Charlesjsharp 12:22, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Very noisy and also not sharp enough. -- Ikan Kekek 06:44, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined --LexKurochkin 17:32, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
==[edit]
- Nomination Textile bag with applications
--F. Riedelio 14:28, 16 March 2021 (UTC) - Decline
- Question Do you own the copyright for the bag? a bag itself is not typically copyrightable, but this has separable graphic elements --Rhododendrites 15:06, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
- Comment The textile bag was purchased over the Internet. Unfortunately, I have not been able to find out whether there is a copyright on it. --F. Riedelio 14:26, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Assuming it is not quite old, I think we have to assume it is copyrighted, sorry. Rhododendrites 17:51, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- Comment The textile bag was purchased over the Internet. Unfortunately, I have not been able to find out whether there is a copyright on it. --F. Riedelio 14:26, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
- support - The photographed object is a utility item (toiletry bag for children). --F. Riedelio 13:56, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
- Comment It is a utility item, but typically we have to consider "separable graphic elements". In this case, the graphic elements are literally separable and seem like the focus of the photo. Still, I will move to discussion to get other opinions. --Rhododendrites 15:25, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
- F. Riedelio, the nomination implies support (note the "excluding the nominator" language below). I've replaced the support template with plain text so as not to throw off any bot/counter. Rhododendrites 12:07, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
- Comment So, the first attempt to close it was the right one. Now it is closed as declined with the last countable vote on 26 March 2021 --LexKurochkin 17:37, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
Comment Sorry, I reverted it back to discussion as undecided. Closing was my mistake --LexKurochkin 07:41, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined --LexKurochkin 17:37, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
File:Palazzo_Guaineri_Vicolo_san_Pietro_Martire_Brescia.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Palazzo Guaineri on Vicolo san Pietro Martire. --Moroder 09:02, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality. --IamMM 08:55, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose I'm not sure about the sky. Its lower part looks burnt. Please discuss. --C messier 20:27, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Disturbing reflections of the windows of the opposite house. --F. Riedelio 13:24, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support I don't agree. Good quality imo. The reflctions of windows of the opposite house are not a problem. Sebring12Hrs (talk) 16:08, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- Comment I have no problem with the reflections, but there are some kind of artifacts on the right toward the top. If this is a stitched photo, maybe they're stitching artifacts. -- Ikan Kekek 19:13, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- Comment @Ikan Kekek: Yes, it's a stitched photo. Could you please put a note. Thanks--Moroder 21:11, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- Comment I'll try. It's pretty subtle, but I'm seeing a diagonal line that goes down as it goes to the left, with a darker shade below it than above it. -- Ikan Kekek 22:16, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- Comment I've checked it on my 32 inches EIZO monitor with different degrees of contrast it's very fine stripes of clouds. BTW the lower part is not overexposed but it's just a uniformely overcast sky. --Moroder 11:40, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support OK, thanks for checking. -- Ikan Kekek 19:57, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Lots of detail and impressive sharpness, but overprocessed and clipping colour channels. --Smial 19:46, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
- There is no clipping on any channell --Moroder 11:49, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Proof by assertion? It is tiring. We've already had this discussion. If I recognize a defect, I will name it and evaluate it accordingly. I will not again spend hours creating proofs, uploading them and then be accused of pixelpeeping. --Smial 12:31, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
- Comment It is pixelpeeping, because the quality of an image is, as I like to point out, the object, the composition, the light, the position of the phocus and and and. Unfortunately, I guess, pixelpeeping, pardon me, is the reason why many people withhold from participating with QIC --Moroder 13:55, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Please compare this image with your other of the same subject, taken with only one minute time difference. The other image has rather natural colours in the sky, no very fine stripes of clouds. Also the colour of the wall, windows etc look much more naturally. But of course I cannot judge whether the weather and lighting conditions in Brescia change so much within sixty seconds on a late winter day with a cloudless blue sky. --Smial (talk) 01:56, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
- Comment The photo was taken around the corner with little sky and towards West, while this photo was taken towards South. Surely taking photos against the sun is much more difficult. BTW I checked the raw file and admit that you are right: I corrected the overexposed sky but, as I said, post processing of a relatively little part of the photo is not a sin. Ciao --Moroder 21:48, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Please compare this image with your other of the same subject, taken with only one minute time difference. The other image has rather natural colours in the sky, no very fine stripes of clouds. Also the colour of the wall, windows etc look much more naturally. But of course I cannot judge whether the weather and lighting conditions in Brescia change so much within sixty seconds on a late winter day with a cloudless blue sky. --Smial (talk) 01:56, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
- Comment It is pixelpeeping, because the quality of an image is, as I like to point out, the object, the composition, the light, the position of the phocus and and and. Unfortunately, I guess, pixelpeeping, pardon me, is the reason why many people withhold from participating with QIC --Moroder 13:55, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Proof by assertion? It is tiring. We've already had this discussion. If I recognize a defect, I will name it and evaluate it accordingly. I will not again spend hours creating proofs, uploading them and then be accused of pixelpeeping. --Smial 12:31, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Commonists 12:42, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support May be some valid concerns if/when this is up for FP, but this is an easy support for QI to me. Rhododendrites 15:56, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose The right side has problems; it looks blown to me, and there are artefacts on the metal bars on that side. Also, there's some weird smudging around the power cable.--Peulle 08:08, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
- Comment The burnt sky was darkened in post processing to prevent it from appearing overexposed. This typically results in exactly the unrealistic colour gradients visible here, namely when the individual colour channels clip offset, so to speak. Darkening cannot repair this. --Smial 02:06, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
- So what? Providing it was darkened, it’s not a capital sin, or do you want condemn all post processing?cheers--Moroder 07:45, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
- "So what"? An image with fake colours should not be QI, that simple. --Smial 08:55, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
- Fake colours like fake news? C'mon Smial. Where are all these images with "right" colours. I insist, photography is an interpretation of reality and, please, don't tell me, that this photo does not show something. Yea the sky might be a little bit wrong off (so what?). Cheers --Moroder 21:42, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
- "So what"? An image with fake colours should not be QI, that simple. --Smial 08:55, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
- So what? Providing it was darkened, it’s not a capital sin, or do you want condemn all post processing?cheers--Moroder 07:45, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
- Comment The burnt sky was darkened in post processing to prevent it from appearing overexposed. This typically results in exactly the unrealistic colour gradients visible here, namely when the individual colour channels clip offset, so to speak. Darkening cannot repair this. --Smial 02:06, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, per Smial. --Milseburg 12:58, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, per Smial. --Ermell 20:11, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, per Smial. --Nefronus 19:47, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 7 oppose → Declined --LexKurochkin 17:40, 2 April 2021 (UTC)