Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives April 29 2023

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:EXP416.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Fairchild silicon planar NPN dual matched transistors dice--Mister rf 00:15, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:58, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose crop --Charlesjsharp 10:28, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
  •  Full Pro. The case is cropped, yes, but this is about the actual chip and bonding, and that is almost perfectly photographed. --Smial 10:00, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Crop is a matter of taste, but the overall quality of the picture is good in my view. --Imehling 16:46, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
  •  Comment Definitely an interesting photo, and a possible VI if nominated in the relevant scope, depending on what its competition is, but I'm not sure it's a QI with those crops. -- Ikan Kekek 06:53, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 06:54, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

File:Grassimuseum_Szenen_des_Lebens_04.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination A 17. century Byōbu that was acquired by Botho Scheube. --FlocciNivis 17:37, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:41, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I think a picture of a work that has so much detail should be sharper. Each person should be sharp. -- Ikan Kekek 00:53, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Ikan. Noise and low DOF. Such a photo motif does not run away, with the use of a tripod, a much better quality would be possible. --Smial 10:08, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 06:53, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

File:2021_Rybnik,_Budynek_starostwa_powiatowego_04.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Powiat office building. Rybnik, Silesian Voivodeship, Poland. --Halavar 11:39, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Sorry: Too busy foreground. --Vasmar1 17:49, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support I disagree. Good composition to me. Trees doesn't spoil the compo to me. It's a beautiful villa with trees in front. Sebring12Hrs
  •  Support Good enough for QI. --Palauenc05 07:32, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support per others. --Smial 11:25, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Disturbing shadow in the foreground, but still QI -- Spurzem 20:21, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Augustgeyler 23:05, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

File:Construction_of_Stuttgart_21_station_in_2023_1X7A7150.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Construction of Stuttgart 21 station in April 2023.--Alexander-93 16:43, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Question What happened to the details here? It locks noisy or over sharpened, somehow  Overprocessed. Fixable? --Augustgeyler 20:52, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
    •  Comment The light was too dark at the end of the hall... I had not tripod with me, so I had to go up with the ISO.--Alexander-93 16:47, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
      •  Comment I see. Would the image improve by reducing the noise reduction? --Augustgeyler 08:47, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
        •  Comment I uploaded a new version. But it's difficult.--Alexander-93 16:44, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
  •  Weak oppose  Thank you. It is still borderline. Good composition. But I think there is too much detail lost. Feel free to ask for other reviews.--Augustgeyler 22:47, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
  •  Weak support Not great but good enough for QI. --MB-one 07:31, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support per MB-one. Not perfect but good enough and very interesting. -- Ikan Kekek 01:06, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support. Interesting image -- Spurzem 20:26, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Augustgeyler 23:07, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

File:Nach_oben_schauen_003_2022_03_26.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination The Fernmeldeturm Mannheim (telecommunication tower) with revolving restaurant from below --F. Riedelio 06:51, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Comment The file names of these should be changed, I think, to something more descriptive.--Peulle 07:12, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
    •  Comment IMHO, the file name is meaningful enough. Detailed information is in the "File information" and in the "Summary". --F. Riedelio 06:12, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done --F. Riedelio 17:50, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Ok for me. --Imehling 16:42, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Augustgeyler 23:09, 28 April 2023 (UTC)