Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives February 01 2016

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:3 Students at bird ringing.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Bird rings. (by Petsikos). --C messier 14:17, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Glavkos 12:14, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose DoF much too shallow. Only a tiny part is in focus. --Cccefalon 14:54, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Cccefalon--Lmbuga 16:15, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 08:45, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Død_fiskehejre.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Great blue heron, dead --Villy Fink Isaksen 15:56, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:43, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Not bad for a cell phone shot but no QI for me --Ermell 19:57, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Insufficient quality. Lack of fine details. --Cccefalon 08:15, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Insufficient quality. Lack of fine details.--Lmbuga 16:14, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 08:45, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Eglwys_Llangelynnin_Conwy_31.JPG[edit]

  • Nomination Llangelynnin Church, possibly one of the remotest churches in Wales. --Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry 19:34, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Comment Tilted.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 20:24, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support OK for me. --A.Savin 13:01, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose A.Savin Are you joking? ... I recognize that the terrain is steep, but there are too many elements that are inclined.See my notes please , IQ for me with a rotation of -0,70 °.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 17:12, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
You realize that the lines you refer to are at different distances from the camera and so it is impossible to have everything straight at the same time - straightening one line mostly means distorting another line? Besides, the "tilts" are not dramatic whatsoever, unlike some photos nominated by yourself like this one. And the image is sharp enough, unlike lots of your nominations. Image guidelines apply for anyone except yourself, monsieur Leclerq? --A.Savin 13:37, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Dear Administrator A.Savin, I agree that these "tilts" are not very dramatic. I realize that the lines being at different distances from the camera generate different perspectives. However, with a rotation of -0.70 °. I remain convinced that the image would be better (in my humble opinion). I never challenged the sharpness of the image, which was taken with a Canon EOS 1100D. Thank you to remember the image of guidelines, and I would endeavor to be more vigilant in the future. I withdrew, however, reported my photos do not meet these criteria ( after corrected).- Best regards--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 14:08, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose unless tilt is corrected --Hubertl 09:33, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support the roof (horizontal line) can not (must not) be straight as it is a perspective, the widows are straight, the house in the background seems straight too. It's true some vertical are not straight but hard to say they are not tilted in the reality. Christian Ferrer 21:39, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Improvable. Tilted and distorted. --Lmbuga 16:03, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 08:46, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Larus_glaucescens,_juvenile,_at_Richardson_Bay.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Juvenile glaucous-winged gull (Larus glaucescens) on the shore of Richardson Bay near Belvedere, Marin County, California. --Frank Schulenburg 23:25, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:47, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Much too dark I'm afraid. Charlesjsharp 17:10, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Too dark. A bit tight at top IMO--Lmbuga 16:00, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 08:47, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

File:2014_Prowincja_Sjunik,_Klasztor_Tatew_(55).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Tatev monastery. Tatev, Syunik Province, Armenia. --Halavar 11:59, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 15:27, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose focusing problems --A.Savin 00:01, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Focusing problems, as A.Savin--Lmbuga 15:57, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Hubertl 08:48, 31 January 2016 (UTC)