Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 06 2021

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review

[edit]

File:Будинок_меї_мрії.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Carpathian Biosphere Reserve. By User:Пивовар Павло --Anntinomy 16:25, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
  • Decline Good quality. --Cvmontuy 02:43, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
     Oppose I'd like to see more megapixels, the photo is really small for a landscape photo in 2020 --Podzemnik 01:31, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Very good and atmospheric image -- Spurzem 12:24, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose As far as image composition is concerned, I completely agree with Lothar. I don't reject downscaling on principle either, as long as it is done to a reasonably justifiable degree. But I cannot accept a photo from an 18-mpixel full-frame camera that is presented here at a size only slightly above our hard limit of 2 Mpixels. Landscape photos today should at least reach the standard of old crop DSLRs from the era of 6 MPixel CCDs. --Smial 16:47, 3 January 2021 (UTC) Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)
  •  Oppose per Podzemnik, even for a 2016 photo. --Peulle 18:23, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --A.Savin 19:12, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Beijing_national_stadium_4.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Beijing National Stadium (Bird's Nest) (by Arne Müseler (User:Arne_mueseler) --Charlie fong 09:27, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Nice shot. --Borvan53 21:54, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Of course a nice shot, but shouldn’t we require a perspective correction? The fence and the buildings in the background (right) are heavily leaning in, so IMHO a perspective correction is necessary. --Aristeas 14:36, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Nice, but too noisy. --A.Savin 17:20, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per others, pending possible corrections. -- Ikan Kekek 00:51, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose A motif for which the use of a tripod would have been very obvious in order to prevent the excessive image noise. --Smial 17:01, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --A.Savin 19:11, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Miami-Florida04.JPG

[edit]

  • Nomination MacArthur Causeway, Miami, Florida, USA --Poco a poco 14:20, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality.--Pierre André Leclercq 22:23, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Not sharp even at thumbnail size. --Kallerna 22:36, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support sharp enough IMO.--Ermell 16:05, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment Sharp in the middle, unsharp on the sides. Could you do something about that? -- Ikan Kekek 17:03, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment I cropped it a bit and applied some sharpening on the sides Poco a poco 13:09, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
  •  Weak support I see the improvement. I like the overall composition and mood and I think the depth of field is reasonable and partly a matter of taste. -- Ikan Kekek 00:56, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --A.Savin 19:09, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Acuario_Shedd,_Chicago,_Illinois,_Estados_Unidos,_2012-10-21,_DD_08.jpg

[edit]

  • Nomination Shedd Aquarium, Chicago, Illinois, USA --Poco a poco 14:37, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion too dark. --Kallerna 09:48, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
    Can we please, discuss it, what do you expect in the middle of the night? the aquarium and skyline is though fine to me --Poco a poco 12:54, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
  • Well, there are reasons why optimum time for photography is not in the middle of night. Sharpness and overall technical quality are fine here, the problem is that 80 % of the photo is just darkness. --Kallerna 07:52, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support o.k. for me.--Ermell 16:14, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Nice photo, and I don't understand the opposition to night photos that show a lot of darkness when that's what's in the sky and reflected onto the water. I much prefer to see blackness than noisy light, which we see in a lot of other night photos. -- Ikan Kekek 17:11, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Per others, we need also photographs from night views. And they are typically dark. Good for me, so :) --PantheraLeo1359531 16:47, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support per others. --Smial 13:43, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --A.Savin 19:08, 5 January 2021 (UTC)