Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives November 14 2021
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination Parish church Saint Leonard and cemetery in Sankt Leonhard bei Siebenbrünn, Arnoldstein, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:54, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:38, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sacristy at the parish church Saint Leonard and cemetery in Sankt Leonhard bei Siebenbrünn, Arnoldstein, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:54, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:38, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination War memorial at the cemetery in Sankt Leonhard bei Siebenbrünn, Arnoldstein, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:54, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:38, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Eastern cemetery gate at the parish church Saint Leonard in Sankt Leonhard bei Siebenbrünn, Arnoldstein, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:54, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:40, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Crucifix at the porch of the parish church Saint Leonard and cemetery in Sankt Leonhard bei Siebenbrünn, Arnoldstein, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:54, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:40, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Johannesberg, Rueckersbach, Sonnenbergstrasse 5, timber framed residential house --KaiBorgeest 22:50, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:13, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A male northern pintail (Anas acuta) in flight at the Llano Seco Unit of the Sacramento National Wildlife Refuge Complex in the Central Valley of California, United States --Frank Schulenburg 22:31, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 23:33, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Memorial window by in the south aisle of Prescot Parish Church to Lieutenant Arthur Frederic Evans --Rodhullandemu 20:44, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 23:33, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination This window is a memorial to Rev. Lewis William Sampson and is shorter than the others because it is above the south door --Rodhullandemu 20:44, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 23:33, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ponta de Castelo Branco, Faial Island, Azores, Portugal --Poco a poco 18:32, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good composition, lighting and detail. But the horizon is slightly curved (not a big issue) and tilted (fixable) -- Alvesgaspar 21:54, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Town Hall Square, Augsburg, Germany --Poco a poco 18:32, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:36, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Vasco de Gama Beach, Sines, Portugal --Poco a poco 18:32, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:36, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Water reflections on Glencoe Lochan, Scotland --Domob 16:42, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Nice reflection --Michielverbeek 18:30, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Príncipe golden weaver (Ploceus princeps) male --Charlesjsharp 16:40, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:38, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Common waxbill (Estrilda astrild jagoensis) --Charlesjsharp 16:40, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:38, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Blue-breasted kingfisher (Halcyon malimbica dryas) --Charlesjsharp 16:40, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:38, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fountain of Constantinus in Kaysersberg, Haut-Rhin, France. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 16:30, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:13, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fountain of Constantinus in Kaysersberg, Haut-Rhin, France. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 16:30, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:13, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fountain of Constantinus in Kaysersberg, Haut-Rhin, France. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 16:30, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:13, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fountain of Constantinus in Kaysersberg, Haut-Rhin, France. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 16:30, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:13, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Aston Martin Vantage Roadster at Auto Zuerich 2021.--Alexander-93 16:21, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 23:31, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Aerial view of Elafonisi beach, Crete. --C messier 14:08, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 15:47, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Aerial photograph of Kedrodasos beach, Crete. --C messier 14:08, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 15:47, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wayside cross in Herbolzheim, Neudenau, Germany (autumn view). --Aristeas 10:00, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 13:08, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Romanesque tympanum of southern portal of the Saint John church in Schwäbisch Gmünd, Germany. --Aristeas 10:00, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 10:51, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The bell tower of the Saint John church in Schwäbisch Gmünd, Germany. --Aristeas 10:00, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 13:08, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tübingen, Germany: view of Bebenhausen Abbey. --Aristeas 10:00, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 13:09, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Weinstadt, Germany, district Strümpfelbach: the listed timber-framed house Hauptstrasse 36-3. --Aristeas 10:00, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 13:09, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Aerial view of Donnersdorfer Falkenberg --Ermell 09:08, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 10:51, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Utsjoki Church in autumn, Finland --Ximonic 07:46, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Hillopo2018 09:42, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Panhard Levassor building, Avenue de la République 187, La Madeleine, France --Velvet 07:45, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 18:07, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Monumental war memorial in the monument zone old cemetery in Haßloch
--F. Riedelio 07:35, 11 November 2021 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 13:51, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Monumental war memorial in the monument zone old cemetery in Haßloch
-
- Nomination Monumental war memorial in the monument zone old cemetery in Haßloch
--F. Riedelio 07:35, 11 November 2021 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 13:51, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Monumental war memorial in the monument zone old cemetery in Haßloch
-
- Nomination Monumental war memorial in the monument zone old cemetery in Haßloch
--F. Riedelio 07:35, 11 November 2021 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 13:47, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Monumental war memorial in the monument zone old cemetery in Haßloch
-
- Nomination Monumental war memorial in the monument zone old cemetery in Haßloch
--F. Riedelio 07:35, 11 November 2021 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 13:47, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Monumental war memorial in the monument zone old cemetery in Haßloch
-
- Nomination Monumental war memorial in the monument zone old cemetery in Haßloch
--F. Riedelio 07:35, 11 November 2021 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 13:51, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Monumental war memorial in the monument zone old cemetery in Haßloch
-
- Nomination Franeker. Martinikerk. Gravestone no. 215.
--Famberhorst 06:28, 11 November 2021 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:23, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Franeker. Martinikerk. Gravestone no. 215.
-
- Nomination Building at Hauptstraße 7 in Rottweil, Baden-Württemberg, Germany. --Tournasol7 05:50, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Llez 06:48, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Castle of Wildenfels, Saxony, Germany. --Tournasol7 05:50, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Llez 06:48, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Building a Schlossstraße 3 in Wildenfels, Saxony, Germany. --Tournasol7 05:50, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:31, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Building at Hauptstraße 32 in Pegnitz, Bavaria, Germany. --Tournasol7 05:50, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:29, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hofgarten in Öhringen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany. --Tournasol7 05:50, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:32, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Paxillus involutus, Brown roll-rim
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:22, 11 November 2021 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:27, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Paxillus involutus, Brown roll-rim
-
- Nomination Inocybe..
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:22, 11 November 2021 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:27, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Inocybe..
-
- Nomination Matthias Sadilek, goalkeeper of SV Stripfing. --Steindy 00:01, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:11, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Matthias Sadilek, goalkeeper of SV Stripfing. --Steindy 00:01, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 15:49, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Matthias Sadilek, goalkeeper of SV Stripfing. --Steindy 00:01, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 15:49, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Colombo comercial mall, Lisbon, Portugal -- Alvesgaspar 22:06, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:25, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mercedes-AMG GLA 35 at Auto Zuerich 2021.--Alexander-93 22:05, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:42, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Monumental war memorial in the monument zone old cemetery in Haßloch
--F. Riedelio 10:17, 10 November 2021 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:42, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
- Nomination Monumental war memorial in the monument zone old cemetery in Haßloch
-
- Nomination Johannesberg, Rueckersbach, Hoersteiner Strasse 27, timber framed residential house (not No. 12 as written at the door bell) --KaiBorgeest 23:10, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Perspective correction necessary. --Steindy 00:24, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
Done--KaiBorgeest 22:26, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Steindy 14:58, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Altes Schloss in Bayreuth, Bavaria, Germany. --Tournasol7 06:45, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Aristeas 10:03, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Marktplatz 24 in Lauf an der Pegnitz, Bavaria, Germany. --Tournasol7 06:45, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Aristeas 10:03, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Castle of Kaysersberg, Haut-Rhin, France. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 06:17, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:21, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Windows of the Synagogue of Colmar, Haut-Rhin, France. (By Krzysztof Golik) --Sebring12Hrs 06:15, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:21, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Green-winged teal in the Central Park Pool --Rhododendrites 22:43, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Very nice picture, a pity that the crop is so tight. Alvesgaspar 22:12, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A man from the Algerian desert travels with his goods that he carries on camels (by Sofiane mohammed amri) --Adoscam 20:42, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Overall unsharp and oversaturated. Alvesgaspar 22:14, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Harebell (Campanula rotundifolia) --Robert Flogaus-Faust 17:08, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
- Withdrawn
I like the idea to photograph the flowers with the raindrop, but Ibelieve that the bells are not sharp enough, --Steindy 17:37, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination --Robert Flogaus-Faust 16:57, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Loch Bà and Rannoch Moor, Scotland --Domob 11:47, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 07:27, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Water reflections in Glencoe Lochan, Scotland --Domob 11:47, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Technical quality on the borderline (poor detail, some noise) but a very nice picture, especially when viewed on a smaller size. -- Alvesgaspar 22:17, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Aschaffenburg, Nilkheim Park, frame of historical swing --KaiBorgeest 23:16, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 07:17, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Decor of Vysotsky Monastery's wall in Serpukhov --Никонико962 21:01, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 07:17, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Candela Seven, Interboot 2020, Friedrichshafen --MB-one 20:31, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose IMHO, the main object is too dark and has only a low level of details --Hillopo2018 09:43, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Embraer Praetor landing at Paris Air Show 2019 with smoke visible at the point of touchdown. --MB-one 20:31, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Basically unsharp and grainy --Hillopo2018 09:41, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sidewalk of Doctor de Visserstraat (Rotterdam, NL) --Trougnouf 20:49, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Overprocessed and unsharp --Hillopo2018 09:41, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Aschaffenburg, Nilkheim Park, billiard saloon and mirror saloon --KaiBorgeest 22:39, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Sorry but this is a bit too soft in my opinion. --Domob 16:48, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron at IAA Mobility 2021.--Alexander-93 08:44, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. The burnt highlights in the background are a bit disturbing, but the main subject is well lit. --Domob 16:48, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Göll massif seen from Bischofswiesen-Stanggaß --Milseburg 17:34, 31 October 2021 (UTC) Description clarified --Milseburg 10:48, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 07:14, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Memorial to Greyfriars Bobby in Edinburgh, Scotland --Domob 16:50, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
Needs some tilt/perspective correction. --C messier 19:09, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Done I've redone perspective and tilt, is it better now? As far as I can tell, all the verticals especially on the church in the background are correct now; I don't think the tombstone itself can be perfectly vertical in addition, as this is just natural perspective. --Domob 11:00, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
Perspective is better but the church in the background looks slightly tilted CCW. --C messier 12:49, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
Done I've given it another try. Somehow this picture is really hard to adjust, not sure why. --Domob 16:35, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --C messier 22:23, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Consensual review[edit]
File:Un_amphi_de_l'école_normale_supérieure_de_Maroua.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Un amphi de l'école normale supérieur de Maroua, Cameroun (by Harouna674) --Bile rene 13:48, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality. --Kritzolina 15:19, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Not well processed, and tilted IMO. --A.Savin 18:29, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose +1. --Peulle 10:46, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose with A.Savin. --Augustgeyler 15:09, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined --Augustgeyler 17:54, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
File:Dimorphotecaeclonis1.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Violet Dimorphoteca eclonis (Cape Margarite) in Tandil, Argentina --Ezarate 20:45, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Comment I believe the flower should be centered. --Steindy 21:28, 6 November 2021 (UTC) Can we wait another reviewer?, I applied rule of thirds here --Ezarate 21:33, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support Good quality. Composition ok, --Smial 13:51, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose I disagreee, let us discuss. --Steindy 20:23, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support I don't love the composition, but the flower is so sharp! -- Ikan Kekek 08:14, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment The composition is really strange. --Augustgeyler 15:10, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support Nothing wrong with the composition and technical quality is very good. Alvesgaspar 21:13, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support QI for me. -- Johann Jaritz 05:06, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Augustgeyler 17:56, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
File:Sankt_Kanzian_im_Jauntal_Stein_Jauntaler_Straße_Bildstock_13102021_9041.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Wayside shrine on Jauntaler Straße in Stein, Sankt Kanzian im Jauntal, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 03:46, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality. --XRay 04:51, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose The shrine isn't in focus at 100%, obscured by a shadow, and if it's the subject of the photo, needs a different composition. --Prburley 15:34, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Taking into account the resolution the image is sharp enough. And IMO the composition showing the environment of the wayside shrine is a good choice. --XRay 09:35, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Per XRay. Thank you, XRay. -- Johann Jaritz 06:11, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Image is slightly tilted (fixable) and subject is blurred (not fixable). -- Alvesgaspar 13:27, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support Overall a bit soft, but good enough. Excellent composition, nice lighting. --Smial 01:25, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support per XRay and Smial. --Aristeas 10:08, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
- Weak oppose A good composition but the image is not sharp enough.--Augustgeyler 08:30, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support--Commonists 00:38, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose I like the composition, but it is unsharp.--Jebulon 16:58, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
- Weak support --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:14, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Promoted --Augustgeyler 17:58, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
File:2021-10-26_Fussball,_Frauen,_Länderspiel,_Deutschland_-_Israel_1DX_1009_by_Stepro.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Women Soccer, Nia Künzer. By --Stepro 21:46, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 00:49, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Top cropped --Tagooty 15:03, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
- Cropping the top of a head is a totally valid thing to do in portraiture. --King of Hearts 16:49, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
- Support Yes, in portraits, making this kind of crop is an established procedure. I don't like it, but it's generally regarded as OK. --Peulle 07:32, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support per others. Nevertheless, I sometimes think that my antique Rokkor MC 1.4/58 or the MC 2.5/100 with their soft, shiny blur had certain advantages over modern, up-to-date technology when photographing portraits. --Smial 11:24, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Usually I don't do portraits with 400mm lenses. But nothing is back to normal at the moment. ;-) Stepro 21:40, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support Good portrait for QI. If this were FPC, opposing for the aesthetic reason of preferring to see the top of her head would be valid; here, I think we should allow for differences in taste. -- Ikan Kekek 00:04, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Differences of taste are ok and welcome but to me this crop is just disturbing, the photographer should decide whether to get the whole head or not, but 95% ist not a good compromise to me Poco a poco 09:58, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Agree, looks just like a casual snapshot. Alvesgaspar 10:44, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
- Weak oppose With Poco a poco. There should be a more clear decision for or against cropping. --Augustgeyler 12:15, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support Per king,surely --Commonists 20:35, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support just the face is enough in this case.--Ermell 22:51, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
- Weak oppose per Tagooty and Poco a poco. Find the top crop disturbing and it could have been easily avoided. --GRDN711 16:45, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment I guess it's a matter of personal preference. For me, this picture without the shoulders and the neck cut off would be a lot more disturbing. Stepro 17:10, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support Good enough for me --Robert Flogaus-Faust 17:15, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose Per above. Matter of taste, but a "portrait" size should have been better for me.--Jebulon 16:52, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
- A photo was only recently rejected because the fingertips(!) of one soccer player were not in the picture and the tips of the hair were missing in another photo. Although I think the photo is good, I can only vote Oppose, according to the general voting behavior. --Steindy 20:31, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
- Support QI for me. -- Johann Jaritz 07:22, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Let me ask two candid questions: i) Is the present framing a deliberate choice? ii) If not, why not try to get a better one with the whole head? The more I read the above comments the more I'm convinced that this discussion has little to do with the merits of this photo or even with the abstract question of "to cut or not to cut one's head". Please read what Rhododendrites wrote about the purpose of QIC, as a 'community exercise', in the on-going discussion about the QIC reviewing process . Alvesgaspar 15:32, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment It's a deliberate choice to cut the head above instead the shoulders below. When you are supposed to stay at your place, and use a 400 mm prime lense, that is the only choice you have.
- But I disagree that this is not the abstract question of "to cut or not to cut one's head". For me it is exactly this question. It is a question of a) personal taste and b) personal style of picture language. In my opinion this should not play any role on QI. --Stepro 21:36, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Thus you agree that your choice was forced by the unfavorable conditions. Which brings us to my second question: why is it so important to promote this particular image, despite its shortcomings, when better chances will certainly arise? By the way, why downsizing the image to about 61% of its original size? -- Alvesgaspar 21:50, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
- Just because I personally think that this particular image meets the standards of quality, and I see no point where this standard is not achieved. It's sharp, has no CA, dust spots, or other technical faults, and I like this composition. I'm often cropping heads without no need as a part of my picture language, as I wrote above. You see "shortcomings", I'm not. --Stepro 22:17, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
- What about the downsampling? You're not supposed to do that, right? -- Ikan Kekek 15:00, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
- Just because I personally think that this particular image meets the standards of quality, and I see no point where this standard is not achieved. It's sharp, has no CA, dust spots, or other technical faults, and I like this composition. I'm often cropping heads without no need as a part of my picture language, as I wrote above. You see "shortcomings", I'm not. --Stepro 22:17, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Total: 8 support (excluding the nominator), 7 oppose → Promoted --Augustgeyler 23:28, 13 November 2021 (UTC)