Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives November 24 2021

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Plowed_Earth_Alentejo_November_2021-1.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Plowed soil for the plantation of sweet potato, Portugal -- Alvesgaspar 19:48, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:47, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, I disagree! The photo is very unsharp (look at the plants first row) and has too low DOF. --Steindy 18:33, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Very nice, unusual composition, and you're complaining about tiny plants in a big picture that you pixel-peeped at? Wow. Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 05:23, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
    •  Comment @Ikan Kekek: Not pixel-peeping! It should only show, that the photo from front (till back) is not sharp. Sorry! --Steindy 00:09, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:45, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Well chosen focus, I don't see relevant faults. --Smial 10:07, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
  •  Comment I like the composition very much. On a technical level, I believe the image would have been even better if a tilt-shift lens had been used to adjust the focus plane onto the field. --Carsten Steger 12:51, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Not sharp --Commonists 13:28, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Augustgeyler 22:37, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

File:St_John_the_Baptist_church_in_Ansbach_(17).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Saint John the Baptist church in Ansbach, Bavaria, Germany. --Tournasol7 06:56, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose IMHO unfavorable image composition (too much foreground should be cropped) otherwise OK. --F. Riedelio 07:24, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
  •  Comment: The foreground does not contribute to the image statement
 Not done within one week. --F. Riedelio 08:30, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support I find the composition acceptable as it is, as the foreground us neither out of focus nor distracting. --C messier 16:00, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Acceptable to me, too. -- Ikan Kekek 05:28, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:48, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
  •  Weak oppose The upper parts of the church are looking too distorted. --Augustgeyler (talk) 06:03, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
  •  Support The correction here is IMO very much within photographer's discretion. --King of Hearts 01:23, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Augustgeyler 14:36, 23 November 2021 (UTC)