Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives September 11 2018

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Thatched_Cottage_on_Cricket_Hill_Ln,_Yateley,_2017-09-23.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Thatched Cottage, Cricket Hill Ln, Yateley --Lewis Hulbert 15:40, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Insufficient quality. Sorry. I can't see the building. The picture is too dark. And there are several other issues like the crop at the bottom. --XRay 17:31, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support I disagree XRay. It´s DX, object is in shadows, sky is shiny. The job was to take the monument in England not Spain. For me indeed absolute QI --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 19:46, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose as per XRay. --Yann 05:39, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose PerXRay --Michielverbeek 17:22, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
  • Weak  Support Colour saturation somewhat high, so we have slight colour noise in dark areas, but the image is sharp enough, exposure is ok, and, well, the building is partly hidden behind green. I cannot see several other issues. There's even a blue sky! --Smial 11:51, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Sorry, Smial, your vote was entered long after the result was determined and is therefore not counted.--Peulle 22:08, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 08:37, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Man_making_a_statue_of_wood.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Man making a statue of wood - Czech Republic. --Adámoz 16:39, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose The right crop is not really good --Poco a poco 17:12, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 06:20, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
Not a QI to me like this as already said --Poco a poco 17:58, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The right crop is disadvantageous. --Milseburg 11:19, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per the others.--Peulle 11:48, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support Main object and the artist/worker are very well depicted. Which essential information is lost at the right side? This is not a car, where some information of the design of the rear lights would be necessary... --Smial 11:56, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Sorry, Smial, your vote was entered long after the result was determined and is therefore not counted.--Peulle 22:06, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 08:36, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Bamberg_Rui_Chafes_8272120.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Sculpture by Rui Chafes in the courtyard of the University of Bamberg --Ermell 06:46, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose the background disturbs --TheRunnerUp 18:25, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
     Comment I disagree. Unfortunately, there is no other way to photograph the artwork. --Ermell 19:07, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
    Ok, than you made a very good image of this object, but not a "quality image" --TheRunnerUp 20:03, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
  • Weak  Support. Probably a photo in winter without leaves gives a better background. Technically the image is perfectly QI, background somewhat unpleasant, but natural, so "weak" support. --Smial 13:43, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
  •  Comment Thanks for your support und the suggestion but the exhibition ended in August.--Ermell 12:55, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
  • Weak  Support More then sufficient pic quality. For my eyes the roof right side is disturbing the view a lot. From artist image is made as it should be. "Metall into Trees." To play in b&w or downgrading green saturation could be an option. --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 07:05, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support I don´t know the artist's intention, but maybe this surrounding and background is part of it. --Milseburg 12:14, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 08:37, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Mimegralla_albimana_7782.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Mimegralla albimana --Vengolis 02:32, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion The file name needs changing, and it's a bit small; is there a larger version available?--Peulle 12:48, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
  • @Peulle: File name changed ✓ Done. No larger version available:( -Vengolis 08:30, 2 September 2018 (UTC) I just don't know. I think I'm leaning towards
  •  Oppose given the fairly small size but I would like to have a second opinion so I'm moving this to CR.--Peulle 10:24, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support - QI to me. I don't see where it's lacking. -- Ikan Kekek 06:13, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support o.k. for me.--Ermell (talk) 12:20, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support QI --Lmbuga 13:09, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support The quality of an image is completely independent of its file name. The serial number of the camera or the software for image processing are indeed not rated. --Ralf Roletschek 14:17, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support Fine 4 me. --Palauenc05 16:58, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 08:36, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Snow_bridge_near_Småtindisen.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Snow bridge near Småtindisen. --Frankemann 13:48, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Comment What is the ligt flare on the left side? --TheRunnerUp 18:25, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support @TheRunnerUp, I think you just intended to leave a comment, which you do by simply typing the comment and not changing "Nomination". But since it's here, I support and find that this photo looks really good. -- Ikan Kekek 07:54, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
  •  SupportYou are right - sorry, I'm new here. Yes, the photo ist good. What must be done to get it back to the correct way?--TheRunnerUp (talk) 08:59, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
  •  Comment Don't worry about it; the process here at CR will carry on as normal and the photo will be promoted after 2 days if there are no opposing votes. Moving it here just delays it a little while. Welcome to the boards. :) --Peulle 09:33, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
  •  CommentThank you for your interest in the photo, and sorry for the late reply! The ligt flare is reflected sunlight, that is to say strong sun at low altitude. Kind regards --Frankemann 16:05, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 08:36, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

File:2018_Kościół_św._Michała_Archanioła_w_Lewinie_Kłodzkim_2.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Saint Michael Archangel church in Lewin Kłodzki 2 --Jacek Halicki 08:40, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Sorry but imo car and powerline are pretty disturbing --Moroder 11:33, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
I disagree and please discuss --Jacek Halicki 21:43, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Weak  Support. The car doesn't hide relevant parts, and we can't cut power lines. Not a great photo, but good lighting, informative and technically good enough for QI. --Smial 07:44, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
    •  Comment I believe that if you want to shoot a quality photo you can wait the car to pass or ask the driver to move. For the power line once can userà mor suitable lens or shooting angle --Moroder 18:50, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support - I agree with Smial. -- Ikan Kekek 09:10, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The car is OK, but the power line is a problem. Yann 09:23, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I think the power line at this position is a no go for a QI. --TheRunnerUp 20:21, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
  •  Comment On the other hand we have to notice, that File:2018 Kościół św. Michała Archanioła w Lewinie Kłodzkim 1.jpg went through despite the power line without any complaint. --Milseburg 12:22, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Milseburg 15:27, 10 September 2018 (UTC)