Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives September 14 2018

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Wat_Amarintharam_(I).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Wat Amarintharam, Bangkok. --Supanut Arunoprayote 12:54, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Yann 05:41, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I don't agree, main object is distorted and sky is a bit noisy --Michielverbeek 07:08, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Michel.--Ermell 19:02, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
  •  Comment the bright areas on the columns and statues are overexposed, but the noise in the sky doesn't bother me. The extreme ultra wide angle perspective isn't really nice, but it's not a lack of quality in the sense of the QI project. --Smial 08:25, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 21:08, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Wat_Amarintharam_(II).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Wat Amarintharam, Bangkok. --Supanut Arunoprayote 12:54, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Yann 05:41, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I don't agree, main object is distorted and sky is a bit noisy --Michielverbeek 07:08, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Michel.--Ermell 19:03, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
  •  Comment the bright areas on the columns and statues are overexposed, but the noise in the sky doesn't bother me. The extreme ultra wide angle perspective isn't really nice, but it's not a lack of quality in the sense of the QI project. --Smial 08:24, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 21:07, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Volvo_B20_HaJN_5572.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Volvo B20 Fürth Dambach --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 05:16, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 05:32, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose (for now) There should be a much more precise category (identification of the type is desirable). --A.Savin 12:59, 8 September 2018 (UTC) Category was added (say "thank you" to Herranderssvensson, if you want). --A.Savin 10:21, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
     Comment if it helps, it's probably a Volvo Amazon, but I don't know which type exactly. --Yerpo 15:22, 9 September 2018 (UTC) THX Yerpo, chronology/past comment from my side "...example with Volvo B20 I´m still not sure if it´s Amazon type" ̈Nur darum geht´s A.Savin gar nicht....--Hans-Jürgen Neubert 04:57, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
     Comment THX for help, but is it not little bit inexplicit? I still can imagine it´s a Volvo Amazon 121, B20. No idea how to sort it. With 120 nobody will find it. Is it not like car production series, for example BMW e30, e36, e60 and so on? --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 08:56, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support OK. Yann 06:28, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 21:07, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Cap_carbon_bejaia.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination English: Cap carbon, Béjaia province in Algerie. By User:Mokhtarjet7 --Reda Kerbouche 11:30, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Bottom is a hard shadow, top isn't very sharp --Trougnouf 13:48, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support OK for me. The shadow gives focus to the rock. --Yann 18:11, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
  •  Comment All buildings on the rock are leaning --Smial 10:24, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
    •  Oppose Not addressed, buildings still leaning. Needs CCW rotation and probably slight perspective correction. --Smial 09:54, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support for me it's ok. --Reda Kerbouche 05:53, 11 September 2018 (UTC) The nominator is excluded from voting. --Milseburg 18:37, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 21:06, 13 September 2018 (UTC)