Commons:Valued image candidates/(Toulouse) Sarapis-Pluton - Musée Saint-Raymond, Ra 29.jpg

(Toulouse) Sarapis-Pluton - Musée Saint-Raymond, Ra 29.jpg

promoted

Image
Nominated by	Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2022-05-21 05:43 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Sarapis-Pluton - Musée Saint-Raymond Toulouse
Used in	Global usage
Review (criteria)	Best in Scope, useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 13:16, 21 May 2022 (UTC)  Oppose, not the right colors, all the other pictures show pinkish shades in the stone that is not present here. Best in scope is File:MSR-ra-29-1-DM.jpg. Léna (talk) 16:20, 24 May 2022 (UTC) @Léna: I don't understand your oppose. As you know the color can be due to the illumination. So it is difficult to say which color is right and which is wrong. -- Spurzem (talk) 15:41, 27 May 2022 (UTC) This is an artwork picture, so for me criteria 3 (Must illustrate its subject well) and criteria 1 (most valuable illustration) imply color as "true to nature" as possible. The stone used here has pinkish shades visible in natural and shady light, so it is a missing information (and thus less well illustrated and less valuable) in this picture compared to File:MSR-ra-29-1-DM.jpg. Léna (talk) 15:48, 27 May 2022 (UTC)  Oppose, I agree with @Léna: . Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 17:26, 27 May 2022 (UTC)  Support I disagree. It is a museum object, the pinkish shades are caused IMO by artificial, not natural light. The picture shows the colour-corrected natural look. Such a correction is allowed to show the natural color, not the one falsified by artificial light. --Llez (talk) 05:04, 28 May 2022 (UTC)  Support OK for me. --Palauenc05 (talk) 10:06, 28 May 2022 (UTC) Result: 3 support, 2 oppose => promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 22:25, 28 May 2022 (UTC)