Commons:Valued image candidates/Baggerwerkzaamheden op de Langwarder Wielen (03-30-2018) 01.jpg

Baggerwerkzaamheden op de Langwarder Wielen (03-30-2018) 01.jpg

promoted

Image
Nominated by	Famberhorst (talk) on 2022-02-22 16:37 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Woest (tugboat, 1938)
Used in	Global usage
Review (criteria)	Support. Good and useful -- Spurzem (talk) 18:22, 22 February 2022 (UTC) * Oppose - IMO the scope is too tightly defined as nominated. A scope of “Woest (tugboat, 1938)” with linked category makes a claim that this is the most valued image of this old tugboat in Commons. The addition of “Location: Langwarder Wielen” as a further narrowing of the scope to this old tugboat at just this location is unnecessary. Suggest dropping the location. --GRDN711 (talk) 23:03, 22 February 2022 (UTC) * Support With scope correction, now support nomination. --GRDN711 (talk) 23:30, 27 February 2022 (UTC)  Support No reason to oppose. A simple hint would have been more appropriate. --Palauenc05 (talk) 08:21, 23 February 2022 (UTC) Question: do I need to change anything?--Famberhorst (talk) 16:29, 23 February 2022 (UTC)  Comment Typically, I would just have made a comment on the scope issue. Unfortunately per COM:VIC, there was already a statement of support for this mage and I had to oppose it in order to move the status to "discuss". As mentioned in my oppose motion, the easy way to clean up the scope is to just drop the location. It is not needed. A VI scope of "Woest (tugboat, 1938)" with linked category becomes a nomination that this is the most valued image of this tug - no additional location limitation needed. --GRDN711 (talk) 07:26, 27 February 2022 (UTC)  Done. Small correction. Thanks for your reviews.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:14, 27 February 2022 (UTC) Result: 3 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:21, 28 February 2022 (UTC)