User talk:GRDN711

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, GRDN711!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 01:49, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-11-22 MV TUSTUMENA - IMO 6421086 18-09-07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please check your image. Resolution too small, leaning out, sharpness must be better. --XRay 05:12, 23 November 2018 (UTC) Increased resolution from orginal. Please review again. --GRDN711 12:36, 23 November 2018 (UTC) It's still not sharp enough and it's leaning out too. Another question: Is this the full resolution now? --XRay 13:23, 23 November 2018 (UTC) Thank you for your comments. Increased resolution to maximum possible – 7639 pixels long side. To minimize distortion of 5-image stitch, applied lens correction and manual vertical upright correction using building edge on right. --GRDN711 04:21, 24 November 2018 (UTC)  Support It's only a weak support. The sharpness could be better. And I've added some missing categories for you. --XRay 06:27, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2018 is open!

Dear GRDN711,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in R1 of the 2018 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2018) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked.

In the final (and current) round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2018.

Round 2 will end 17 March 2019, 23:59:59.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 18:04, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for your participation in Wiki Loves Love 2019

Wiki Loves Love 2019 has ended and team Wiki Loves Love sends you greetings and appreciation for joining us in spreading love around the globe and documents how love is expressed in different cultures. We hope to see you again in 2020. Till then stay tuned to know the results of WLL19 that will be out in this April. Please make sure that your email is enabled so we can communicate with you if you are one of our prize winners.(learn more how to do)

Best regards.

Wiki Loves Love International Team

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:31, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-03-16 03 Aquaculture in Chile.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 16:51, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-03-16 01 Aquaculture in Chile.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 17:04, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-02-15 074 Roseate spoonbill (Platalea ajaja) at Sian Ka'an Biosphere Reserve, Mexico.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:31, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-03-03 Chinstrap penguin on Barrientos Island, Antarctica.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:17, 24 July 2019 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Nirmal Dulal 08:20, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:2019-03-03 Chinstrap penguin on Barrientos Island, Antarctica.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2019-03-03 Chinstrap penguin on Barrientos Island, Antarctica.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 17-08-02 FIREBOAT 3 - City of Vancouver, BC, Canada 17-07-16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Oppose Insufficient quality. Sorry. It's not sharp enough. --XRay 04:51, 27 July 2019 (UTC) Although it is a good image, I did not realize that Frank was going to nominate it for QI. I uploaded this image nearly two years ago when I had just started with Commons and accidentally upsampled the original cropped image through misunderstanding. I have uploaded a new version for review. Please see if this is better. --GRDN711 03:07, 29 July 2019 (UTC)  Support It's still not the best, but acceptable. So here is my very minor support. --XRay 06:27, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011-06-04 Kjeungskjær Lighthouse (The Red Sailor), Sør-Trøndelag, Norway.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 01:38, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments in the United States – Back for 2019!

This user participated in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Want to show your participation in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019? Add {{User Wiki Loves Monuments 2019}} to your userpage!

Hello! Last year you contributed to Wiki Loves Monuments 2018 in the United States. Thanks to people like you it was a great success, with over 1,900 people contributing over 10,000 photos of cultural and historic sites from all over the country. Hundreds of these photos now help illustrate Wikipedia articles, improving our open knowledge about United States history, culture, and heritage. If you haven't seen the winners yet, be sure to check them out here.

I'm pleased to say that we're back this year with Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 in the United States, and I'd like to welcome you to participate once again in the event. Check out our updated event page for more information. Just like last year, you'll be able to upload your photos of any registered historical site in the United States through the end of September (even if the photos were taken before this month).

If you've traveled and taken photos of monuments in non-US countries, you can see if those countries are also participating here.

Once again, thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2018, and we hope to see you again in this year's event! If you'd like to respond to this message directly, please do so on on my talk page. ~Kevin Payravi (talk) 05:15, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pygoscelis antarcticus (Chinstrap penguin), in the wild, walking.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Look at the scope changes according to the rules. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:30, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:31, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment we should not have in Antarctica in scope. Charles (talk) 09:04, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Will remove oppose GRDN711 when scope changed. Charles (talk) 11:38, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment @Charlesjsharp: we can discuss pleonasm, and make a remark, but in no way vote negatively. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment I can't find pleonasm @Archaeodontosaurus: (I had to look the word up!!) as this penguin lives in other places apart from Antarctica. I am not aware that the Antarctic population differs from the others. The VI rules cover this exact issue of adding a location to a scope: "storm clouds over London" would not be acceptable unless there were buildings or other features visible which could distinguish it from, say, "storm clouds over Sydney" or "storm clouds over Tokyo"." Charles (talk) 08:00, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
• I thought you did not want to see wild and antartic together. I understand better, and you're right, but it's important to make a difference with an image of Zoo. So we have to keep in the scope: Wild or Antarctic. What annoys me the most is how to welcome newcomers. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:50, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Sorry, I didn't realise GRDN711 was a newcomer. I have edited scope myself to our standard format for his reference. Charles (talk) 13:50, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
• --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

08:50, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

•  Comment Thank you both for your assistance with defining the correct scope for this image.

Commons:Photo challenge/2019 - July - Fishing/Winners

	Photo Challenge – Third Place
	Congratulations! Your picture 2019-03-16 03 Aquaculture in Chile.jpg won the 3rd place in the Photo Challenge Fishing, in July 2019. You can find the results of the challenge here.

-- Jarekt (talk) 11:55, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments in the United States 2019 – Last day to enter!

This user participated in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Want to show your participation in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019? Add {{User Wiki Loves Monuments 2019}} to your userpage!

September 30th is the last day to upload photos for Wiki Loves Monuments! We're thrilled that the United States has almost reached 4,000 contributions so far this year. Of these images, ~370 (~9%) have already been used to help illustrate Wikipedia articles and pages on other wiki projects, which is fantastic.

If you've already made a photo contribution this year, thanks so much! If you have any last-minute photos of U.S. historical sites to upload and enter into the contest, today's the day to do it. Check out the United States event page for more information. Judging will take place throughout the month of October, after which the top-ten national finalists will be announced in early November.

If you've traveled and taken photos of monuments in non-US countries, you can see if those countries are also participating here.

As always, thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments! If you'd like to respond to this message directly, please do so on on my talk page. ~Kevin Payravi (talk) 05:49, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-03-12 NAVIMAG ferry, EVANGELISTAS - IMO 7627962.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Armenak Margarian 13:45, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-03-14 NAVIMAG ferry, TRINIDAD I - IMO 8917871.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 12:41, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aquaculture mussel farming in Chile.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:54, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aquaculture fish farming in Chile.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:55, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chilean NAVIMAG ferry, EVANGELISTAS.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chilean NAVIMAG ferry, TRINIDAD I.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. -- ~riley (talk) 00:28, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014-04-29 Northwestern crow (Corvus caurinus).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 02:55, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Northwestern crow (Corvus caurinus), adult.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Must connect the scope to the category that contains the image --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:29, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment done - hope this helps --GRDN711 (talk) 00:11, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment ''{{c|Corvus caurinus}}'' this syntax points to the category; this one ''[[Corvus caurinus]]'' towards the gallery. Both are acceptable, but for the gallery you must also put your picture.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Perfect now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-08-14 02 KEILIR - IMO 9849928.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:27, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-08-14 01 KEILIR - IMO 9849928.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:11, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-08-13 02 LEYNIR - IMO 9126388.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:34, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-08-13 01 LEYNIR - IMO 9126388.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 04:42, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-08-13 01 Purple Sandpiper (Calidris maritima), Reykjavik Iceland.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:41, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-03-19 SOCIBER VALPARAISO III floating drydock.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good focus to main object --Michielverbeek 22:01, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-08-13 02 Purple Sandpiper (Calidris maritima), Reykjavik Iceland.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Axel Tschentscher 06:51, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Floating drydocks in Valparaíso, Chile.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:28, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

Category:Interior of St Nicholas Church, Wallasey

It helps if you also move the contents of a category to the new name. It doesn't happen automatically. Thanks. Rodhullandemu (talk) 19:33, 30 November 2019 (UTC)

Actually the parent category is Category:St Nicholas's church, Wallasey, so you've also broken the naming existing convention. Rodhullandemu (talk) 19:35, 30 November 2019 (UTC)

Also, we don't do what Wikipedia does, because they don't take much care about getting things right. We do here. Rodhullandemu (talk) 19:36, 30 November 2019 (UTC)

Hello @Rodhullandemu:

Thank you for pointing out the necessity of moving all images to a new sub-category name. I should have remembered that...

The real issue I was trying to address was the spelling of the Commons parent category name (Category:St Nicholas's church, Wallasey) and all sub-category names. The church web site says “Welcome to St Nicholas Church, Wallasey”, as does Wikipedia and Google. I would propose that “St Nicholas's church, Wallasey “ be changed to “St Nicholas Church, Wallasey” in all Commons category and sub-categories names. No ‘s and all first letter caps indicating a name rather than a possession.

Your thoughts?

GRDN711 (talk) 02:17, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

• I agree that we should use the names of organisations and institutions that they themselves use, as long as we are consistent about it. I'm currently uploading a sequence of photos of the church interior, so when I've finished that I'll move the whole lot to Category:St Nicholas Church, Wallasey. Cheers. Rodhullandemu (talk) 08:04, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

Now  Done Rodhullandemu (talk) 10:05, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Thak you, @Rodhullandemu: , for your help with this. --GRDN711 (talk) 17:36, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-08-29 RIO - IMO 8613047.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:07, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019! Please help with this survey.

 

---

Dear GRDN711,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team 12:34, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 11-05-30 020 DNFS Young Highland bull, Denmark.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 23:12, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 11-05-30 018 DNFS Young Highland bull, Denmark.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:20, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011-05-30 008 Young Highland bull, Denmark.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:20, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dun-colored, young Highland bull.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Not a good scope. Species of animal is relevant, not location. Charles (talk) 13:23, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment The Wikipedia topic on Highland cattle describes the spread from Scotland to other countries and there are 17 countries listed as sub-categories in the Commons category of "Highland cattle by country". Still, I see your point and have put together a new scope. Does this work better? --GRDN711 (talk) 21:41, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:57, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 11-05-30 019 DNFS Young Highland bull, Denmark.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 Participant Survey (Reminder)

 

---

Dear GRDN711,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team 03:43, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Happy holidays 2020!

		* Happy Holidays 2020, GRDN711! *
		Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!    -- George Chernilevsky talk 15:35, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014-04-29 Google Maps Streetview car.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 09:53, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Calidris maritima littoralis.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Very good image, used and useful -- Spurzem (talk) 19:04, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Best in Scope--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:00, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Stenberg at Liverpool 2020.jpg

Sternberg? Rodhullandemu (talk) 16:31, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Sorry Rodhullandemu, it was too early when I added the caption. Hopefully OK now. And if it still does not work, feel free to correct. --GRDN711 (talk) 16:38, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Message

Hi, Gordon I received a message two days ago that you wrote to me on my Email, but I did not receive anything. I'll send you my address via Commons if it works. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

Nain and Nain Airport

Hello, Gordon! I found your photos from Nain Airport: 12, thank you for them. But have you any photos of Nain and it's airport? I would like to add some photos in articles about Nain... --DS28 (talk) 11:57, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Keilir (ship, 2018) - IMO 9849928.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Very good and useful image -- Spurzem (talk) 20:17, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-07-14 019 Sifto Salt Mine, Goderich ON Canada.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very interesting motif and good photo, but please look carefully for dust spots in the sky and water and remove them. -- Ikan Kekek 23:25, 4 July 2020 (UTC) Thanks for the review, Ikan. Have re-worked image. Please take another look. --GRDN711 03:34, 5 July 2020 (UTC) Better, but I still see several dust spots in the sky. At least 3 are above and a bit to the left of the blue area of the building on the left, at least 7 are over white areas, and I see another one above the blue tower on the right. -- Ikan Kekek 18:41, 5 July 2020 (UTC) @Ikan Kekek: >Done. --GRDN711 03:21, 7 July 2020 (UTC) Great. Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 08:55, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-07-14 45 Sifto Salt Mine, Goderich ON Canada.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very interesting motif and good photo, but please look carefully for dust spots in the sky and water and remove them. -- Ikan Kekek 23:25, 4 July 2020 (UTC) Thank you, Ikan - I have removed all spots including ones that could be loons, Canada geese, seagulls and turkey buzzards :). Please review. --GRDN711 03:34, 5 July 2020 (UTC) I wish you'd put the birds back into the picture. They were obviously birds and IMO added to the photo. However, I still see at least 8 spots across the sky. Many are pretty light, but see what you can do. -- Ikan Kekek 18:43, 5 July 2020 (UTC) @Ikan Kekek: >Done. --GRDN711 03:21, 7 July 2020 (UTC) I still see 2 light dust spots. Let me know if you'd like me to mark the photo. I'll  Support, though. -- Ikan Kekek 08:57, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sifto Salt Mine in Goderich Harbour.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Question GRDN711, does File:2018-07-14 019 Sifto Salt Mine, Goderich ON Canada.jpg show more of the facilities? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:15, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

 Comment Ikan – this is a stitched panorama of 2 images that includes all of the mine buildings. I did make a further image in this sequence and have an alternate panorama (3 images) that shows more of the road on the right leading to the plant, as well as well as train shipping. It doesn't show more of the buildings but does give a wider view of the mine facility. Please review and comment. --GRDN711 (talk) 01:13, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment Your link isn't working. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:04, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

•  Comment @Ikan Kekek: Try File:2018-07-19 037 Sifto Salt Mine, Goderich ON Canada.jpg --GRDN711 (talk) 20:36, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

•  Best in Scope -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:36, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

• The other one's a nice photo, though. Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:37, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:55, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-03-29 CARNIVAL VISTA - IMO 9692569, in Willemstad, Curaçao.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The photo could probably have been sharper. But good enough for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:37, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:2019-03-16 03 Aquaculture in Chile.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2019-03-16 03 Aquaculture in Chile.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-03-30 CARNIVAL VISTA - IMO 9692569, off Oranjestad, Aruba.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. The horiuon is not completely horizontal, I would suggest to rotat the image a bit; and please remove the dust spot (see image note). --Aristeas 09:31, 12 July 2020 (UTC) Done and thank you for your review. --GRDN711 18:43, 12 July 2020 (UTC)  Support Thank you! --Aristeas 07:20, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016-11-23 01 Live fish carrier MV HAUGBAS – IMO 9121778.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please improve the categorization. --XRay 05:11, 15 July 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Blood Red Sandman 17:02, 15 July 2020 (UTC) Categorizatoin checked for all 4 images. --GRDN711 22:43, 15 July 2020 (UTC) Categories checked for all 4 images. --GRDN711 22:45, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-03-15 01 Live fish carrier, PATAGON IV - IMO 9296171 2019-03-15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-03-15 02 Live fish carrier, PATAGON IV - IMO 9296171 2019-03-15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016-11-23 02 Live fish carrier MV HAUGBAS – IMO 9121778.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please improve the categorization. Which harbour? --XRay 05:14, 15 July 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Blood Red Sandman 17:02, 15 July 2020 (UTC)  Support It's OK now, but @Blood Red Sandman: it is not OK to promote an image if there is an issue of another reviewer. --XRay 08:09, 16 July 2020 (UTC) @XRay: Indeed, and apologies; I somehow managed to miss the prior comment until after GRDN711 commented to note they had added cats. By then, the issue was addressed and it was too late, otherwise I would have struck my {{S}}.Incidentally, for some reason that ping didn't work. --Blood Red Sandman 16:32, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-07-19 037 Sifto Salt Mine, Goderich ON Canada.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:17, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Leynir (ship, 2000) - IMO 912638.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Excellent image, useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 21:01, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Patagon IV (ship, 2003) - IMO 9296171 .
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

+  Support Not yet used, but useful and very good -- Spurzem (talk) 21:04, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Haugbas (ship, 1995) - IMO 9121778.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Good and useful image -- Spurzem (talk) 21:06, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-08-23 MAGNI – IMO 9339727, in Reykjavik, Iceland.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 15:24, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-03-15 04 Live fish carrier, PATAGON IV - IMO 9296171 2019-03-15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 08:55, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-03-15 03 Live fish carrier, PATAGON IV - IMO 9296171 2019-03-15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 08:55, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-03-15 02 Live fish carrier, RONIA ATLANTIC - IMO 9451563.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful view, although the top of the ship appears blurred in the vertical direction. The noise is somewhat acceptable. --Navinsingh133 18:56, 24 July 2020 (UTC) Tuned CA's, lens correction and slight noise modification. Please take another look. --GRDN711 15:17, 26 July 2020 (UTC)  Support Support, given high resolution and the amount of detail, it should be considered a quality image. --Navinsingh133 19:00, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ronia Atlantic (ship, 2009) - IMO 9451563.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 16:34, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011-06-10 Tallink Shuttle ferry, SUPERSTAR - IMO 9365398.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Fischer.H 17:21, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-02-02 APRIL MORAN - IMO 9373711.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --PJDespa 17:30, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-08-31 FIREBOAT FB-1 - City of Vancouver, BC, Canada.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 06:59, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Superstar (ship, 2008) – IMO 9365398.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope Rich category that I reduced by 25 images. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:44, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
April Moran (tugboat, 2006) - IMO 9373711.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:28, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016-11-13 01 Kjeungskjær Lighthouse, Sør-Trøndelag, Norway.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:45, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-02-02 03 Tugboats, APRIL MORAN - IMO 9373711 and JEAN TURECAMO - IMO 7501077.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:20, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016-11-13 02 Kjeungskjær Lighthouse, Sør-Trøndelag, Norway.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:20, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-02-02 02 APRIL MORAN - IMO 9373711.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments CA should be removed. --Ermell 20:57, 16 August 2020 (UTC) I usually correct slight CA’s in post processing but missed this one. It now looks better to me. Please review again and thank you for catching it. --GRDN711 03:14, 17 August 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:10, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kjeungskjær Lighthouse.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-08-27 Breitling DC-3A (HB-IRJ) at Reykjavik, Iceland.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:27, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 15-09-11 006 Quark Expeditions ship, Sea Adventurer (Nassau registry IMO 7391422), at Griffin Inlet, Beechey Island, Nunavut, Canada.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Celeda 15:16, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020-08-24 MS FRAM - IMO 9370018, at Brown Station, Antarctica 2019-03-10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:11, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-08-27 02 Icelandair Douglas DC-3 (TG-NPK) at Reykjavik, Iceland.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:46, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

Spanjaardsgat

Hello, Gordon! Thank you for your review of File:Breda Spanjaardsgat spinola.jpg. I don't have different images, but I can upload a crop focusing on the Spanjaardsgat watergate if you are in need for it. Just let me know. --Velvet (talk) 10:18, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

Hello Velvet: I don't have a specific need for a Spanjaardsgat image. There are other images in the same category but were taken at the wrong time of the year, or not as well done as yours. I just thought if you had one of just the Spanjaardsgat, Commons could always use a good image of this landmark. It would find a home in Wikipedia topics. Best - --GRDN711 (talk) 04:53, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-08-15 02 SAERUN (SÆRÚN; Særún) - IMO 7713034.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 03:27, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-08-27 Icelandair Douglas DC-3 (TG-NPK) at Reykjavik, Iceland.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-08-15 01 SAERUN (SÆRÚN; Særún) - IMO 7713034 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please improve the categorization. For example a category for the location is missing. --XRay 03:40, 31 August 2020 (UTC) Have added 2 more categories related to the image location for both images. The key cateegory is the original "Særún (ship, 1978)" which links this ship to its unique IMO# and multiple other categories in Iceland. Hope this helps. --GRDN711 16:51, 31 August 2020 (UTC)  Support IMO OK now. Thank you. --XRay 07:08, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:2016-11-13 01 Kjeungskjær Lighthouse, Sør-Trøndelag, Norway.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2016-11-13 01 Kjeungskjær Lighthouse, Sør-Trøndelag, Norway.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015-09-06 Summit Airlines BA Avro RJ85 C-FLRJ.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nirmal Dulal 08:31, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-03-14 CAPITÁIN LEONIDAS - IMO 5542705.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Not the sharpest, but very nice --Basile Morin 02:41, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-10-07 WILLIAM H. LATHAM - MMSI 366844950 18-10-06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 13:43, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 18-04-08 NORDKAPP IMO 9107772 11-06-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A lovely shot, but I see chromatic abberation and also soft detail. Do you still have the RAW file, and if so are you able to fix the CA and produce a sharpened image using the full resolution of the original RAW file? --Bobulous 20:10, 23 September 2020 (UTC) Also, this feels like it needs about three degrees rotation counter-clockwise. --Bobulous 20:12, 23 September 2020 (UTC) The image is distinctive taken in the low light of early spring but there is no RAW file. It was a JPG image taken on a Nikon D60 DX with a kit zoom lens in 2011. I also cropped the image to more closely focus on the ship. To address the issues you mention, I have loosened the crop; counter-rotated the image by 0.75 degrees (3 degrees is far too much) and did further minor tuning to address CAs and sharpness. Hopefully, this helps. --GRDN711 21:30, 23 September 2020 (UTC)  Support Yes, I think the looser crop improves the composition and reduces the demands on the level of detail on the boat. As for rotation, my apologies, I think I misled you wildly with my recommendation. I'm even thinking that maybe your original orientation was correct. --Bobulous 18:52, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-05-08 WILLIAM H. LATHAM - MMSI 366844950 on the NIagara River.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 19:31, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Danish Coastguard patrol ship, HDMS TULUGAQ (Y388).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:49, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sisak IV (ship, 1999) - IMO 9206346.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:41, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 18-04-05 SISAK IV - IMO 9206346 17-09-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice! There is a dust spot in the sky (see image note), I would suggest to remove it. And if you are at it, the horizon is not 100% horizontal; so rotating the photo by 0.1° or so counterclockwise could be helpful. --Aristeas 09:27, 14 October 2020 (UTC) Thank you for noticing those two issues - have implemented changes. --GRDN711 03:08, 16 October 2020 (UTC)  Support Thank you very much! --Aristeas 09:54, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 17-12-11 AVIAQ ITTUK MMSI 331010000 17-09-06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:48, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments in the United States 2020 – Last day to enter!

This user participated in Wiki Loves Monuments 2020.

Want to show your participation in Wiki Loves Monuments 2020? Add {{User Wiki Loves Monuments 2020}} to your userpage!

Hi there! Kevin from Wiki Loves Monuments in the United States here. I know it's been a tough year for everyone, and I hope this message finds you well.

You are receiving this message as a participant in last year's Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 in the United States. First, a recap: We concluded with over 5,200 great photos of U.S. historical sites made possible by contributors like you. If you haven't yet seen, last year's U.S. winners are viewable here, and the international winners here (including multiple from the United States!).

Second, as you may have seen from the banner notices on Wikipedia, this year's Wiki Loves Monuments 2020 in the United States has been running through October instead of September in consideration of the pandemic and the hectic start of the fall season. Despite the challenges of the year, we're thrilled that the United States has surpassed 5,000 photo contributions so far.

October 31st is the last day to upload photos for the U.S. competition this year. If you've already contributed, thank you so much - and it's great to have you again this year! If you haven't yet contributed but are interested in participating again, you're invited to join us during these last couple days. Check out the United States event page for more information. Remember that you are welcome to upload and submit photos of historic sites that you've taken any time in the past, not just this month.

As always, thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments! If you'd like to respond to this message directly, please do so on on my talk page. ~Kevin Payravi (talk) 07:20, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aviaq Ittuk (ship, 1983) - MMSI 331010000.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Very good and useful image -- Spurzem (talk) 21:44, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:28, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-09-08 AVIAQ ITTUK - MMSI 331010000 at Narsaq Harbor, Greenland.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-06-13 North Bull Lighthouse in Dublin Bay, Ireland.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Oppose Insufficient quality.  Overexposed Sky --Wilfredor 22:02, 2 November 2020 (UTC)  Done Gray Irish mornings are a challenge to process. Have reverted to initial upload. Please see if this helps. --GRDN711 02:53, 4 November 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Wilfredor 16:52, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2020! Please help with this survey

Dear GRDN711,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2020, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 200K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.

Please fill in this short survey and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2020.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team, 08:21, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Copenhagen AirTaxi (CAT) Partenavia P.68 Observer (OY-SUR).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 20:57, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:24, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-09-12 Atlantic Airways (Faroe Islands) Airbus A319 aircraft (OY-RCG) at Narsarsuaq, Greenland.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tesla Delacroix 20:54, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Happy holidays 2020/2021!

		* Happy Holidays 2020/2021, GRDN711! *
		Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!    -- George Chernilevsky talk 12:39, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Norlandair Beechcraft Super King Air B200 (TF-NLB).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:33, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-09-20 Norlandair Super King Air B200 (TF-NLB), at Nuuk Airport.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 00:55, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-10-08 03 Quidi Vidi Brewing Company, north of St. John's, NL Canada.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 11:11, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-08-15 01 Klofningur Lighthouse (also called Klofningsviti) near Flatey Island, Iceland.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice atmosphere and sharp enough for me. -- Ikan Kekek 02:38, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pioneer Bay (ship, 2000) - IMO 9164550.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:39, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Klofningsviti Lighthouse, Iceland.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:41, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 23:52, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Baldur (ship, 1979) - IMO 7804962.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:41, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:25, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Angaju Ittuk (ship, 1984) - IMO 8208737.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support unique in scope Ezarateesteban 22:01, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-09-20 03 Copenhagen AirTaxi (CAT) Partenavia P.68 Observer (OY-SUR) aircraft, Kangerlussuaq Airport, Greenalnd.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Please add a category for the location. --XRay 03:49, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-08-15 02 BALDUR – IMO 7804962.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:52, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-08-15 01 BALDUR – IMO 7804962.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. But please add a category for the location. --XRay 03:54, 7 May 2021 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the review. --GRDN711 10:56, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Air Greenland Airbus A330-200.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Good and useful image -- Spurzem (talk) 12:32, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
•  Comment I don't think location is relevant for aircraft scope. Charlesjsharp (

talk) 11:43, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

@Charlesjsharp: Why shouldn't we have the location? I remember being criticized for presenting a picture without one. -- Spurzem (talk) 12:32, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

 Comment If we have each airport as a separate scope we could have thousands of scopes for each type of plane, not to mention different liveries. The same limitation applies to animals, we define species and not location unless it produces a variant. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:29, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

•  Comment @Spurzem: @Charlesjsharp: } The scope in this nomination was initially set up as (airline livery x plane model x plane ID # x location) as this is the structure that planes of various airlines tend to be sub-categorized at Commons. As Spurzem has noted, in a QI nomination of a plane, location is usually required. Still, Charles, you make a reasoned point in your bird analogy. I have redefined a wider scope for this nomination as (airline livery x plane model x plane ID #) linked to a suitable category. See if this wider scope (and more plane images to consider) works for both of you in this nomination. --GRDN711 (talk) 02:49, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
• Requirements for QI are that imgaes should be properly categorized, so every animal photo should have location, but that is not relevant for VI, neither is plane id, which I think you should remove from scope. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:36, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

•  Oppose see above. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:06, 11 May 2021 (UTC) Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:34, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

•  Comment @Spurzem: @Charlesjsharp: } Sorry, Charles, I should have been back to you earlier but life intruded and I also had to think about this further. Somewhat reluctantly, I have come around to understand and accept your perpspective that (airline livery x plane model) is a more appropriate VI scope for civilian planes owned by airlines. In the case of this Air Greenland image, the airline has only one jet in their fleet and the scope change does not make any effective difference. There is a counter-case to be made involving privately owned civilian planes but I will leave that to another day. It should be noted that the plane registration # should be in the image description for the image to have long-term utility in Commons. Have revised VI scope for this image to “Air Greenland Airbus A330-200”. --GRDN711 (talk) 02:49, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

•  Support Perfect now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:52, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:2019-03-14 CAPITÁIN LEONIDAS - IMO 5542705.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2019-03-14 CAPITÁIN LEONIDAS - IMO 5542705.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ocean Endeavour (ship, 1982) - IMO 7625811.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:28, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Maine Marine Patrol Protector rigid inflatable boat (RIB) .
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:31, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose I think the scope should include the type of boat. I guess they might have more than one patrol boat type.  Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:53, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
•  Comment @Agnes Monkelbaan: @Charlesjsharp:  new scope thanks. This is a Maine Marine Patrol Protector rigid inflatable boat (RIB) made by Rayglass Boats, a New Zealand manufacturer. It is typically assigned to a single officer for patrol in a given coastal area. --GRDN711 (talk) 13:55, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021-07-20 02 Maine Marine Patrol Boat at Winter Harbor ME USA.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:21, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021-07-20 Maine Marine Patrol Boat at Winter Harbor ME USA.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:00, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-03-10 01 ESPS BIO HESPIRIDES A33 - IMO 8803563.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 16:55, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-03-10 02 ESPS BIO HESPIRIDES A33 - IMO 8803563.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 16:55, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-03-10 03 ESPS BIO HESPIRIDES A33 - IMO 8803563.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 16:55, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
A33 Hesperides (ship, 1991) - IMO 8803563.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:51, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
USCGC Key Biscayne (WPB-1339).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Famberhorst (talk) 04:35, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:52, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014-04-29 02 Northwestern crow (Corvus brachyrhynchos caurinus).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:14, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

DRs

Hi. Files that have been around for ages are usually best to go through the deletion request process rather than being nominated speedy where there is any uncertainty about the scope of a file. Also, when adding any sort of deletion nomination, then please leave the rest of the file detail and information intact. Thanks.  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:57, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021-08-24 C.T.M.A. MADELEINE II - IMO 943010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:57, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 28 August 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
C. T. M. A. Vacancier (ship, 1973) - IMO 7310260.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Madeleine II (ship, 2019) - IMO 9430105.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:26, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
CCGS Cape Spry (ship, 2003).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:34, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:38, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021-08-31 01 Pendlebury - St. Andrews North Point Lighthouse, Saint Andrews NB Canada.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 17:17, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Andrews North Point Lighthouse, NB Canada.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope, useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 21:20, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mulholland Point Lighthouse, NB Canada.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2019-03-05 MS FRAM - IMO 9370018, in the Errera Channel of Antarctica.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:51, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

Vikingen Island

Hi, User:GRDN711. I think you may have made a hasty decision in withdrawing your VIC nomination, given the nomination rationale you stated in your withdrawal post. It's not that showing the whole island doesn't add value; it's that if you want to nominate a photo of the whole island, your scope should be the island. I'd have to look at its competition, but it's quite possible that the photo you nominated is best in scope for the scope of the entire island. Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:27, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

• Hello Ikan. Thank you for your thoughtful email. You are probably right in suggesting a change of scope to the entire island would have been best option for a VI rating. However, I did not discern that in your original oppose and was focused on the Arctic Circle marker. It is really the only distinction of this large fjord rock that is Vikingen Island. I disagree with your alternative image choice for most valued marker and will leave it to others to see if there is a different consensus (not likely, IMHO... you win some; you lose some). Both of my images are used in Wikipedia and other Wikis. Best, Gordon --GRDN711 (talk) 00:23, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021-08-23 02 Panmure Island Lighthouse, PEI Canada - side.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:51, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fingal (ship, 1964) - IMO 5419957.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021-08-23 01 Panmure Island Lighthouse, PEI Canada - front.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perspective correction necessary. --Steindy 00:33, 26 September 2021 (UTC) * Done @Steindy: With the slanted walls, I didn’t see it. Tweaked perspective -- GRDN711 13:27, 26 September 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 15:40, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Panmure Head Lighthouse, PEI Canada – side view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:34, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
"Fram (ship, 2007)" - IMO 9370018 – side view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Much higher quality, but apparently, something wrong happened with this nomination, because I can't edit the other one to vote on it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:33, 18 September 2021 (UTC) *
•  Info The original MS Fram image was somehow stuck in a promotiion mode and not open for review. This has been resolved and both images are now open for comments. --GRDN711 (talk) 19:11, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
•  Comment Promoted. Rodhullandemu (talk) 12:20, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Panmure Head Lighthouse, PEI Canada – front view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope Rodhullandemu (talk) 19:07, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-06-07 Sycamore Gap Tree (Acer pseudoplatanus), next to Hadrian’s Wall UK.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 03:39, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sycamore Gap Tree on Hadrian’s Wall Path.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Helena (ship, 1946) – IMO 5203683.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-10-07 01 Terry Fox Statue at Mile 0, St. John's NL Canada.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 16:59, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-10-07 02 Terry Fox Statue at Mile 0, St. John's NL Canada.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments * Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 14:00, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-10-07 03 Terry Fox Statue at Mile 0, St. John's NL Canada.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments * Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 14:00, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021-08-23 Montague Harbor, Prince Edwards Island, Canada.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:02, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Montague Harbor, Prince Edward Island, Canada.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:33, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:10, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-10-03 02 The Gut Harbor at Quidi Vidi, St. John's, NL Canada.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 03:02, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Statue of Terry Fox at Mile 0 of his Marathon of Hope.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:27, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:04, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Crux Australis (ship, 2009) – IMO 9471161.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:32, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Almirante Condell (FF-06) - IMO 8949616.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Very impressive atmosphere, but the ship is too dark to see any details. -- Spurzem (talk) 20:50, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

•  Best in Scope to me. I can see details on my monitor. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:16, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
  
•  Comment @Spurzem: It is an early winter morning in Valparaiso, The CNS Almirante Condell (FF-06) was going out as we were coming in. If you look at the full image instead of the thumb, there is lots of detail in the shadow side of the ship. A histogram shows a full color range with no pinching at the low end.
  Still, your comment got me thinking and tuning the image a little. I lightened the image overall and boosted the shadows slightly. I prefer this lighter version over the previous. See if it works for you as well.

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:54, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

Discussion at QIC talk page

A discussion is being held here, over the reviewing process at QIC and the possibility of improving our Image Guidelines. As a regular contributor to the project, your opinion would be most welcome and valued. Alvesgaspar (talk) 11:50, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tres Hombres (ship, 1943).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Beautiful image, useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 22:00, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:45, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2020-01-24 01 STAR FLYER - IMO 8915433.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:55, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Star Flyer (ship, 1991) - IMO 9451563.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:40, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:2020-01-24 01 STAR FLYER - IMO 8915433.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2020-01-24 01 STAR FLYER - IMO 8915433.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 28 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021-11-19 01 Ogden Point Breakwater Lighthouse - Victoria, BC Canada.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 15:39, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2021-11-19 02 Ogden Point Breakwater Lighthouse - Victoria, BC Canada.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 11:11, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 07:02, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ogden Point Breakwater Lighthouse.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best. --Augustgeyler (talk) 12:07, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Malaspina Sky (ship, 2008) - IMO 9370458.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Usefull & used. --August Geyler (talk) 23:58, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:15, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

Happy holidays 2021/2022!

		* Happy Holidays 2021/2022, GRDN711! *
		Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!    -- George Chernilevsky talk 13:22, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014-04-28 MV KITTITAS - IMO 7808114.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 07:11, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kittitas (ship, 1980) - IMO 7808114.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support. Useful and used -- Spurzem (talk) 12:13, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2022-01-09 ELM K - IMO 9614294.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:34, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Elm K (ship, 2012) - IMO 9614294.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:55, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Queen of Cumberland (ship, 1992) - IMO 9009360.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 14 January 2022 (UTC)