Oppose I don't think the scope is relevant. If I were standing on the Tour Montparnasse and looked in the other direction, I would see something totally different. I'm not convinced a view from scope is acceptable. W.S.09:57, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No, sorry. the place where a picture is taken from doesn't seem relevant IMO. (if it where an aerial image then the type of plane it was taken from wouldn't be important neither). W.S.13:04, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Point of view/perspective is a general criterion for categorizing images at Commons. If the location was indifferent, people wouldn't climb up on several different towers. Even for aerial images, the location would be of importance (unless it's a "plan view" or the view of a moving object). -- Docu at13:14, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Docu, thank you for nominating this picture. The "arguments" of Wetenschatje are not seldom against the picture itself but against the person that had made the picture, that is my experience. So please don`t look after the logic of his arguments because there can't be found. --Wladyslaw (talk) 10:34, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If s.o. is not able to explain his questionable arguments than it is very difficult to take this arguments seriously. This is just a soberly fact-finding that noticed also other users. --Wladyslaw (talk) 11:17, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
