Commons:Valued image candidates/Sigismund-Schrein in Saint-Maurice (Foto Sp).jpg

Sigismund-Schrein in Saint-Maurice (Foto Sp).jpg

promoted

Image
Nominated by	Spurzem (talk) on 2020-10-21 10:02 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Treasury of Saint-Maurice abbey: Relief of Saint Mauritius on the Sigismund Shrine
Used in	Global usage als: Abtei Saint-Maurice, als: Saint-Maurice VS, als: Mauritius (Heiliger), ca: Maurici d'Agaunum, cs: Svatý Mořic, de: Mauritius (Heiliger), de: Abtei Saint-Maurice, de: Mauritiuskirche, de: St. Mauritius (Neufra), fr: Maurice d'Agaune, fr: Pierre II de Savoie, nl: Mauritius (heilige)
Review (criteria)	Supportused Okay for such an old photo.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:45, 22 October 2020 (UTC) why the tight crop? Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:53, 21 October 2020 (UTC) Hallo, Charlesjsharp, I took this picture 30 years ago. Today I don't remember why I didn't take this photo from a greater distance. It may be that the conditions in the room and the lens available to me were the reason; but it can also be that I chose this cut on purpose. But if you think the picture is unusable, say so, for you are a professional in contrast to me. Best regards -- Spurzem (talk) 18:59, 21 October 2020 (UTC) quality is too poor for me, but not enough to oppose. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:51, 21 October 2020 (UTC) @Charlesjsharp: I didn't know that we here are in "Featured pictures super plus". -- Spurzem (talk) 06:41, 22 October 2020 (UTC) The rules say "it is still expected that the image is of a reasonable technical quality and standard. For photographs, the quality achievable using the built-in camera in a modern mobile phone should normally be good enough. The technical standard required should be achievable by any photographer who has taken care over the image." Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:30, 22 October 2020 (UTC)  Comment I made some edits to capitalization. Feel free to undo some of my edits if I was too generous in what words I considered part of proper names. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:14, 22 October 2020 (UTC) Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. George Chernilevsky talk 14:09, 25 October 2020 (UTC)