Commons:Valued image candidates/Song thrush (Turdus philomelos philomelos).jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Song thrush (Turdus philomelos philomelos).jpg

undecided
Image
Nominated by Charlesjsharp (talk) on 2022-07-14 17:34 (UTC)
Scope Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Turdus philomelos philomelos (Song thrush)
Used in Global usage
Reason Many images but I think this shows the diagnostic Vs well -- Charlesjsharp (talk)
Review
(criteria)
  •  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Question You may have mentioned this at some point in the past and if so, I apoligize for forgetting your answer. In the scope, why is the specific epithet repeated in the binomial species name? --GRDN711 (talk) 01:14, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Question In the past I had a bird nom rejected because the image did not show all of the feet. In this case, while the image is of good quality and shows the Vs on the breast of the bird really well, this bird appears to have only one leg. I don't think this is characteristic of the species. Can you comment? --GRDN711 (talk) 01:14, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
the repeat of the binomial defines the suspecies. It is not essential to mention this for the nominate ssp but is helpful for VI. Two legs would be better than one if the rest of the image is as good. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:09, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thank you for the explanation. Unfortunately, on the nominatiion, I  Oppose with regret. The image is excellent quality but IMHO for VI, all of the subject should be showing. I would accept a feature being partially obscured but a whole leg is beyond that. --GRDN711 (talk) 21:42, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Question I had imagined that the fuzzy shape behind the first leg could be the foot of the second leg. Is it true that he only had one leg? This would be very exceptional and would therefore deserve a new scope.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:38, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the explanations, I maintain my vote. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Result: 1 support, 1 oppose =>
undecided. A1Cafel (talk) 04:40, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
[reply]