User:Shyamal

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

English Wikipedia User page Alternate upload account - especially for Commons App which fails 2FA in some versions

Userboxes
VG-4
AF-4
Noia 64 apps karm.svgThis user has been on Wikimedia Commons for
18 years, 6 months and 20 days
  • Summary as of 6 May 2022 - User "Shyamal" has 19375 files (54.45% in use, down from 55.37% last year in July). Average "Multiplicity of usage" (or the number of places on Wikimedia Projects where usable images are displayed) 198781/10549 = 18.84 - which sounds good, better the average GLAM project funded by the WMF.
Site Images used
en.wikipedia 25506
arz.wikipedia 19461
ar.wikipedia 12762
fr.wikipedia 12649
it.wikipedia 10355
vi.wikipedia 9367
cy.wikipedia 6692
nl.wikipedia 5918
pt.wikipedia 5835
ceb.wikipedia 5387
wikidata.wikipedia 5381
pt.wikinews 5184
sv.wikipedia 5029
es.wikipedia 4924
de.wikipedia 4492
zh.wikipedia 3183
sk.wikipedia 3140
ru.wikipedia 2756
ca.wikipedia 2502
pl.wikipedia 2336
uk.wikipedia 2244
ja.wikipedia 2133
war.wikipedia 2124
species.wikipedia 1983
no.wikipedia 1906
eu.wikipedia 1810
fa.wikipedia 1633
ta.wikipedia 1553
hu.wikipedia 1525
ko.wikipedia 1433
bg.wikipedia 1074
meta.wikipedia 1063
ml.wikipedia 1056
ast.wikipedia 845
bn.wikipedia 828
tr.wikipedia 755
lmo.wikipedia 746
lv.wikipedia 745
bs.wiktionary 740
fi.wikipedia 725
eo.wikipedia 701
id.wikipedia 672
az.wiktionary 669
lt.wikipedia 656
ro.wikipedia 645
he.wikipedia 624
fi.wiktionary 618
hi.wikipedia 586
da.wikipedia 546
te.wikipedia 545
ms.wikipedia 532
cs.wikipedia 517
th.wikipedia 496
gl.wikipedia 462
avk.wikipedia 455
br.wikipedia 419
sr.wikipedia 409
pnb.wikipedia 400
en.wiktionary 356
hy.wikipedia 324
azb.wikipedia 304
az.wikipedia 296
la.wikipedia 249
el.wikipedia 244
ne.wikipedia 242
kn.wikipedia 239
my.wikipedia 214
af.wikipedia 214
simple.wikipedia 210
mr.wikipedia 178
or.wikipedia 178
nv.wikipedia 172
fr.wiktionary 171
ta.wiktionary 162
nn.wikipedia 159
as.wikipedia 151
hr.wikipedia 151
ur.wikipedia 148
mk.wikipedia 146
mrj.wikipedia 142
si.wikipedia 140
ka.wikipedia 135
zh_yue.wikipedia 117
be.wikipedia 107
et.wikipedia 103
sl.wikipedia 99
gu.wikipedia 96
sh.wikipedia 94
pl.wiktionary 93
tl.wikipedia 90
pa.wikipedia 85
wikimania2018.wikipedia 82
kk.wikipedia 79
incubator.wikipedia 76
wikimania2016.wikipedia 73
bs.wikipedia 71
ku.wikipedia 71
en.wikivoyage 71
mzn.wikipedia 64
bh.wikipedia 64
new.wikipedia 57
ga.wikipedia 55
sq.wikipedia 54
jv.wikipedia 53
de.wikiversity 51
ru.wiktionary 51
en.wikiquote 50
fy.wikipedia 48
nl.wiktionary 45
sw.wikipedia 44
is.wikipedia 41
sa.wikipedia 40
min.wikipedia 38
ky.wikipedia 35
mn.wikipedia 34
ckb.wikipedia 32
be_x_old.wikipedia 32
an.wikipedia 32
su.wikipedia 31
vec.wikipedia 29
tt.wikipedia 29
ba.wikipedia 28
oc.wikipedia 28
tr.wiktionary 27
zh_min_nan.wikipedia 26
ia.wikipedia 25
ja.wiktionary 25
sco.wikipedia 24
als.wikipedia 24
sd.wikipedia 24
cv.wikipedia 24
he.wikisource 22
mai.wikipedia 21
lt.wiktionary 21
en.wikibooks 20
tg.wikipedia 20
de.wikivoyage 20
mt.wikipedia 20
fr.wikisource 19
uz.wikipedia 19
so.wikipedia 19
ce.wikipedia 19
frr.wikipedia 19
ha.wikipedia 19
en.wikisource 18
th.wikisource 18
fr.wikinews 17
qu.wikipedia 17
mg.wikipedia 17
it.wikiquote 17
it.wikivoyage 17
am.wikipedia 16
pt.wiktionary 16
ru.wikinews 15
beta.wikiversity 15
ps.wikipedia 15
ca.wiktionary 15
mnw.wikipedia 14
gd.wikipedia 14
fo.wikipedia 13
bcl.wikipedia 13
fr.wikibooks 13
diq.wikipedia 13
hu.wikibooks 13
it.wikiversity 12
pam.wikipedia 12
dty.wikipedia 12
de.wikisource 12
nds.wikipedia 11
ru.wikimedia 11
kw.wikipedia 11
gom.wikipedia 11
ja.wikibooks 11
lb.wikipedia 11
bar.wikipedia 10
te.wiktionary 10
ilo.wikipedia 10
pms.wikipedia 10
Total image usages 198781
Distinct images used 10549


My approach[edit]

Please note that I do not and will not attempt to classify images to all possible and existing categories or by adding them to pages. I however ensure that they belong to at least one suitable category and include the description which has the keywords needed for a searcher to find the image. In all likelihood the image will also be in use on a relevant page on the English wikipedia.

It is particularly unfortunate that Commons has a completely chaotic system of categories. For instance there is "Category:Bird family Y" and "category:Birds of Location X" and then there are passing users who create "category:Birds of Location X belonging to family Y" - this is clearly non-scaleable. I think temporal, geographic, conceptual classes need to be kept apart and no combinations should be made (eg:prefer India, 1887 as two categories rather than India in 1887). Categories should be "atomic" - similar to Codd's rule.

I believe that spatial categories, especially those used for organisms, should not be done with named entities or textual labels - we ought to have either points, bounding rects or polygons and all searches some polygons and points can be mapped to names on Wikidata so that spatial search on commons is meaningful.

Note to compulsive category hierarchy maintainers: Some categories like "unidentified insects of xxx" are not at all useful when insects (or other such groups) are already identified to genus - chances of identifying them to species are almost zilch.

Postscript - see Commons_talk:Structured_data

I have no way of influencing Wikimedia Commons administrators and established users to understand that Categories such as "Insects of India", "Insects of Karnataka" etc are downright ridiculous - the photo may have been taken in that named region but unless you really know that a species is restricted to those boundaries, that is a completely useless category. Probably ok to use from but there is no way to get that edgeways to the powers-that-be here.

Also, folks importing organism images from Flickr that are lacking location information, just know that your drudgery is meaningless ...

Mediawiki feature wishlist[edit]

SVGs with within commons image linking ability - SVG has a feature to link raster images in it - Mediawiki would do well to allow images from commons to be linked. This would allow annotation, clipping and some nice features. The rsvg rasterizer however may need to support this further. Even better would be a Commons- online SVG editor to produce some of these annotated images. It might however raise some legal eyebrows in some contexts:- we allow some copyrighted content as part of freedom of panorama and using a clip region to isolate the copyrightable part could lead to some hitherto unheard of legal issues.

Note that "virtual" clipping is now possible via en:Template:CSS_image_crop

Bookmark[edit]

Done till

  • Ibis 1922
  • PZSL 1903 2

Tools to use[edit]