User talk:لا روسا

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, لا روسا!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki—it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. If you have experience contributing to Wikipedia, we have information that you might find useful.

Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can see the files you have uploaded in your gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg Only upload freely licensed or public domain content. Fair use is not allowed on commons. If you're copying files from another Wikimedia project, use the CommonsHelper You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Simply use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Simply tag it as {{speedy|reason for deletion}}. For more information read the full deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 11:39, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

RE: Conocer el tipo de una estrella de mar

El nombre de esa estrella de mar es Luidia ciliaris (Philippi, 1837) y suele presentar dos patrones de coloración como el del enlace anterior o este y su área de distribución la puedes observar aquí --Veronidae (talk) 14:44, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

Please do not recreate deleted content

 

---

Your image or other content, Third Celebration Conference, Egypt- October 2013, was recently deleted in accordance with our process and policies. You have recreated this content after it was deleted; please do not do this. If you would like to contest the deletion, please visit Commons:Undeletion requests and follow the instructions there to have the deletion reviewed. Recreating deleted content outside of process is not allowed, and doing so repeatedly may cause you to lose your editing privileges. Thank you for understanding.

If you have questions, you may ask them at the Village Pump in any of 42 languages or on my talk page. I will also watch for questions here on your talk page for at least a week. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:38, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

File:View of Alhambra at night003.JPG

File:View of Alhambra at night003.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kulmalukko (talk) 21:26, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey. Dear لا روسا, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

File source is not properly indicated: File:Octoberportal.jpg

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Octoberportal.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Denniss (talk) 09:41, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

---

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey! Dear لا روسا, Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests! In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days. And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy! Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically sighted. This will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to help users watching Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones. Thank you. INeverCry 01:10, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

تسجيلات صوتية

مرحبا.بما أنك خبيرة في اللغة الإسبانية، أقترح عليك تسجيل ملفات صوتية لنطق أسماء مقالات إسبانية (بصوتك أو بأصوات تلاميذك)، واستخدامها في ويكيبيديا الإسبانية وويكيبيديا العربية (وهذا مثال لتسجيل صوتي لنطق اسم مقالة).شكرًا --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 16:13, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

File:Swan goose 005.JPG

File:Swan goose 005.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cutwind (talk) 15:38, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Swan goose 010.JPG

File:Swan goose 010.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cutwind (talk) 15:38, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Swan goose 009.JPG

File:Swan goose 009.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cutwind (talk) 15:38, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Swan goose 003.JPG

File:Swan goose 003.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cutwind (talk) 15:38, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Swan goose 008.JPG

File:Swan goose 008.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cutwind (talk) 15:38, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Swan goose 007.JPG

File:Swan goose 007.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cutwind (talk) 15:39, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Fatir 009, Lion Village.JPG

File:Fatir 009, Lion Village.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cutwind (talk) 15:41, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Fatir 015, Lion Village.JPG

File:Fatir 015, Lion Village.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cutwind (talk) 15:41, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Building, Alex 025.jpg

File:Building, Alex 025.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cutwind (talk) 15:54, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Luidia maculata, Ras Sedr, Egypt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Weak  Support Good quality. Minor overexposed areas, but IMO still QI. --XRay 08:29, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Santiagobernabeupanoramav45.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Its QI for me now. --Hubertl 13:22, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

FPC nomination

Not sure if you know, but just in case you didn't, if you want to support your featured picture candidate nomination of File:Egyptian Grains.jpg, you need to vote for it explicitly. The nomination itself doesn't count as a support. -- KTC (talk) 14:37, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! The Temple of Artemis, Jerash.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments QI -- Spurzem 13:01, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! The Temple of Hercules. Amman.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments QI -- Spurzem 22:37, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Citadel of Qaitbay 014.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments the picture is tilted. and needs correct perspective--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 10:51, 1 March 2015 (UTC) @Milseburg:  Done review it now.--لا روسا 19:11, 3 March 2015 (UTC)) Good quality for me--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 10:37, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Pillars at Jerash.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 17:45, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Nutmeg ready.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments QI for me. subject is in focus. --Hubertl 19:02, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Girls cleaning coffee.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments QI for me, please add template for personal rights warning --Isiwal 16:00, 16 March 2015 (UTC)  Done--لا روسا 05:30, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! MaliCuisine.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 14:31, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Spicy dreams.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. Sharpness is not perfect, but though QI for me --Hubertl 14:31, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Egyptian Grains.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments  Comment I see some compression artifacts which are mostly visible on the red beans. --Ximonic 04:51, 16 March 2015 (UTC) @Ximonic: i uploaded new one, review it please.--لا روسا 10:21, 20 March 2015 (UTC) Good Now . --Ercé 10:47, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Lemon Boy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:38, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Egyptian Food.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 09:47, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Dead Sea beach 00.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments thin QIThe sky seems to me, blown out.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 15:07, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Dead Sea Salt 00(1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments  weak Somewhat unsharp for the size, but okay. --Crisco 1492 03:33, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Dead Sea Salt 00.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments  Weak support OK for me. --C messier 20:14, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Umm Qais00 (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments it's better. Good quality for me.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 17:20, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Roman ruins at Jerash 00.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments ok --Cccefalon 05:13, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Umm Qais00 (1).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments ok --Cccefalon 05:13, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Umm Qais 00 (3).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Umm Qais000 (2).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments  Comment Shadow needs brightening. --Hockei 15:33, 4 April 2015 (UTC) @Hockei: i uploaded a new one, review it please.--لا روسا 20:20, 7 April 2015 (UTC)  Support Looks better. --Hockei 10:15, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Bust of Napoleon, Soumaya Museum.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments  Support Not excellent but acceptable.--Jebulon 15:25, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Chac Mool, Teotihuacán.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 17:15, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Huehueteotl, Teotihuacán.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments  Support --Jean11 16:26, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 06:38, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Mexican Sombrero 00 (8).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:20, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Seller, rubber hoops 004.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 12:21, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Pink Flower. Alex 005.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 09:52, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Seller, rubber hoops 004.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Seller, rubber hoops 004.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Sunrise, Nuweibaa 00 (45).JPG

And also:

• File:Sunrise, Nuweibaa 00 (43).JPG
• File:Sunrise, Nuweibaa 00 (13).JPG
• File:Sunrise, Nuweibaa 00 (68).JPG
• File:Sunrise, Nuweibaa 00 (56).JPG
• File:Sunrise, Nuweibaa 00 (58).JPG
• File:Sunrise, Nuweibaa 00 (57).JPG
• File:Sunrise, Nuweibaa 00 (55).JPG
• File:Sunrise, Nuweibaa 00 (54).JPG

Yours sincerely, Ies (talk) 17:07, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Ein Khadra Desert Oasis 00 (21).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. I´m not sure about the white balance, but its ok for me. --Hubertl 14:41, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Acacia in Ein Khadra Desert Oasis 00 (87).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Category too unspecific. As there is a tree as central motif, it should be identified.--Cccefalon 04:36, 1 October 2015 (UTC) @Cccefalon: Done Name y categorization.--لا روسا 09:18, 1 October 2015 (UTC) Good quality. Could be even better when rotated slightly counterclockwise to make the wells walls more vertical. --Cccefalon 18:20, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Camel Nuweibaa 00 (22).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:05, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Camel Nuweibaa 00 (7).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:05, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Acacia in Ein Khadra Desert Oasis(91).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Ein Khadra Desert Oasis 00 (137).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments  Support OK, IMHO. --C messier 08:04, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Ein Khadra Desert Oasis 00 (111).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments OK, IMO. I believe, that the rocks are really that reddish --Hubertl 08:06, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Ein Khadra Desert Oasis 00 (22).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments I think this one is ok --Hubertl 07:51, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Ein Khadra Desert Oasis 00 (27).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments This one is ok for me to, even when weak. --Hubertl 07:51, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Camel Nuweibaa 00 (12).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:04, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Camel Nuweibaa 00 (13).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:14, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Imam Hussein Hadith inscription 00 (4 B).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:57, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Cultural Fashion and Adornment, El Moez St., 00 (40).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 02:06, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Cultural Fashion and Adornment, El Moez St., 00 (26).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Medium69 14:36, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Cultural Fashion and Adornment, El Moez St., 00 (55).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Medium69 14:10, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Cultural Fashion and Adornment, El Moez St., 00 (70).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality. --Medium69 14:10, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Acacia in Ein Khadra Desert Oasis 00 (87).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Acacia in Ein Khadra Desert Oasis 00 (87).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Cultural Fashion and Adornment, El Moez St., 00 (70) - NV.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments Good quality--باسم 22:30, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2015 is open!

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2015 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear لا روسا,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2015 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the tenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2015) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1322 candidate images. There are 56 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category. In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 28 May 2016, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
-- Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 09:42, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Fusilamientopiar (1817).jpg

File:Fusilamientopiar (1817).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

The Photographer (talk) 19:25, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Simón Bolívar y Simón Rodríguez en el Monte Sacro en Roma (1805).jpg

File:Simón Bolívar y Simón Rodríguez en el Monte Sacro en Roma (1805).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

The Photographer (talk) 19:26, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Male mallard (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 04:41, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

File:The Tomb of the Unknown SoldierDam.jpg

File:The Tomb of the Unknown SoldierDam.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 09:18, 28 July 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Egyptian Museum (353).jpg

And also:

• File:Egyptian Museum (348).jpg
• File:Egyptian Museum (323).jpg
• File:Egyptian Museum (319).jpg
• File:Egyptian Museum (299).jpg
• File:Egyptian Museum (298).jpg
• File:Egyptian Museum (295).jpg
• File:Egyptian Museum000 (6).jpg

Yours sincerely, Ies (talk) 15:16, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

File:Colosseum Roma13.jpg

File:Colosseum Roma13.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kulmalukko (talk) 22:11, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

File:Colosseum Roma02.jpg

File:Colosseum Roma02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kulmalukko (talk) 09:28, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Colosseum Roma04.jpg

And also:

• File:Colosseum Roma05.jpg
• File:Colosseum Roma06.jpg
• File:Colosseum Roma07.jpg
• File:Colosseum Roma08.jpg
• File:Colosseum Roma09.jpg
• File:Colosseum Roma11.jpg
• File:Colosseum Roma12.jpg
• File:Colosseum Roma14.jpg Kulmalukko (talk) 09:36, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

File:Colosseum Roma23.jpg

File:Colosseum Roma23.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kulmalukko (talk) 09:40, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Colosseum Roma24.jpg

And also:

• File:Colosseum Roma26.jpg
• File:Colosseum Roma27.jpg Kulmalukko (talk) 09:44, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

File:Colosseum Roma30.jpg

File:Colosseum Roma30.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kulmalukko (talk) 09:46, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

File:Colosseum Roma42.jpg

File:Colosseum Roma42.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kulmalukko (talk) 09:48, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

File:Colosseum Roma46.jpg

File:Colosseum Roma46.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kulmalukko (talk) 09:50, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

File:Colosseum Roma60.jpg

File:Colosseum Roma60.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kulmalukko (talk) 09:52, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

File:Colosseum Roma68.jpg

File:Colosseum Roma68.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kulmalukko (talk) 09:53, 13 July 2017 (UTC)