User talk:Arcamadienist

Proof of no copyvio regarding the OTRS Ticket #2020111110007691

Achim55 has posted the marking of possible copyvio on the edit #511971762, however the original file I uploaded on Wikimedia Commons is in the entirely different resolution, aspect and format from those of the suspected file on the unknown server that Achim55 provided its URL.

The original file ๓ ค Ր ງ น ค ૪ ( շ օ շ օ ).png's properties: resolution: 5,625 × 10,000 pixels, file size: 102.13 MB, MIME type: image/png

The suspected file on the unknown server's properties: resolution: 690 × 1,035 pixels, file size: 0.208 MB, MIME type: image/jpeg

It is impossible to regard the suspected file in even lower quality and resolution as the formerly existing reference of the original one.

In addition, there is no watermark on the original file ๓ ค Ր ງ น ค ૪ ( շ օ շ օ ).png meanwhile the suspected file on the unknown server has a line of letters on the bottom of it.

Therefore, I have committed no copyright violation and the deletion request should be removed.

Arcamadienist (talk) 13:33, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

That's fine. Why has your account User:Epidometer been blocked? --Achim (talk) 17:15, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

Show me the undeniable evidences to declare that the user called User:Epidometer is one of Wikimedia Commons accounts I created.

Besides, what kind of violations against the regulations of Wikimedia Commons has User:Epidometer committed? The log shows no reference URL to compare the deleted media work with anything else.

What more can I find than just some of arrogant global sysop operators executed mass deletion including even barely concerned contents without discussing anything about each possibility of violation before murdering all of them, didn't they?

Arcamadienist (talk) 18:00, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

I was just wondering why User:Epidometer did upload exactly the same 5,625 × 10,000 pixels image claiming it to be their own work. --Achim (talk) 18:37, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

I do wonder why you can let me know the formerly deleted image was in the resolution of 5,625 × 10,000 pixels, though the whole information of the image is gone or hidden / invisible to all of us the normal users.

I also wonder why I could create my current account, log in and upload the exacly same concerned media file; nonetheless according to your story I was already globally locked as User:Epidometer.

Arcamadienist (talk) 19:10, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

Don't try to fool us. I've had a look at the deleted File:Yanting Ma (2020).png and I also found both of your uploads of File:Marguax played Yue Ying on Bloody Romance (2018).png and your en:Ma Ge (actress) that has been saved to everybodywiki. --Achim (talk) 20:01, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

For not to be misunderstood: I'm fine with this image being kept after OTRS did pass, even though it is on ameba.jp. --Achim (talk) 21:13, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

Then you are trying to be convincing everyone on this authentic Wikimedia Foundation's community to trust the external copy-logging websites only collecting the last revisions of the unreasonably deleted articles from Wikipedia, operated by the totally unknown outsiders who have nothing to do with the Wikimedia Foundation, giving the permission for nobody to update the stocked legacies on their own servers, any more?

If you are the owner of the external-uneditable-record holding websites, please make every invisible information public.

Mentioning the image on ameba.jp, again it is in the entirely different resolution, aspect and format from those of the file I uploaded on Wikimedia Commons.

Arcamadienist (talk) 21:52, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

See also Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Supremarguax.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 01:51, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

I have seen the checkuser page for Supremarguax and what is the paragraph called Suspected related users?

Why can't the authorities on Wikimedia Foundation make all the IP addresses and access logs public in order to definitively conclude that I am the same person who created those no longer existing accounts; instead of punishing whoever is concerned just for suspicion?

Arcamadienist (talk) 07:33, 12 November 2020 (UTC)