User talk:Medium69/archives/2016/06

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anna - La Reine des neiges - 20150805 15h20 (10990).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GC Ezarate 22:59, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cendrillon - 20150805 17h44 (11003).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK. --C messier 08:57, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fauna - La Belle au bois dormant - 20150805 17h43 (10991).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments This one is OK. --Peulle 09:18, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fée Clochette - 20150804 16h53 (10980).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:15, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Réverbère - 20150805 09h13 (10989).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Réverbère - 20150805 09h13 (10989).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Above a little tight cut, but good enough for me.--Famberhorst 15:50, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fauna - La Belle au bois dormant - 20150805 17h43 (10992).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:15, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fée marraine - Cendrillon - 20150805 17h43 (10995).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 11:21, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fée Clochette - 20150804 16h53 (10981).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. But I'am not going to promto another almost identical Picture. No problem with collectig "QI Trophys". But not this way please. --Tobias "ToMar" Maier 22:30, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jeune femme - 20150804 16h53 (10983).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks OK. P.S.: Is it really neccessary to submit so many versions of the same image? They're almost identical, taken a second apart. --Peulle 16:24, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bert - Mary Poppins - 20150804 16h50 (10964).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments That's a yes. --Peulle 11:14, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abeille - Winnie l'ourson - 20150805 17h48 (11027).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment I think another crop would be better (too much space above, too little below). --C messier 08:57, 1 June 2016 (UTC)  Done --Medium69 02:35, 6 June 2016 (UTC)  Support OK for me. --C messier 12:39, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:Donald Duck - 20150804 16h52 (10977).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Donald Duck - 20150804 16h52 (10977).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ok for me --Hubertl 17:21, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Authorship question

Hello, i was at File:Sciurus carolinensisin Stanley Park, Vancouver 3.jpg fixing a template and wanted to also add the information template. But then i wondered how to fill out the template, if the uploader User:Hartebeest~commonswiki is = "Grant Li"… I ran a short internal search, and found a couple of images like File:Anas platyrhynchos swimming (flocks) in Stanley Park, Vancouver.jpg and File:Anas platyrhynchos in Stanley Park, Vancouver - cropped.JPG where you are given as source/author ("Self-published work by Medium69"), but description also tells "Picture taken by Grant Li".

can you please clarify? is "Grant Li" an alias of you, or is it maybe a location (misleading "by" instead of "nearby"?), or what is meant? Holger1959 (talk) 13:08, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

i still wonder about the "Self-published work" and different names/usernames. i hope you find the time to have a look, and help with clarifiation. Holger1959 (talk) 09:36, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:Jessie - Toy Story - 20150804 16h47 (10949).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jessie - Toy Story - 20150804 16h47 (10949).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:43, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Personnage Disney - Aladin - 20150804 16h51 (10971).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 08:12, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bert - Mary Poppins - 20150804 16h50 (10965).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 11:13, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 21 June 2016 (UTC)