User talk:WikiWookie

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

I usually contribute to the English-language version of Wikipedia as user WikiWookie. Please leave me deletion notifications on my talk page.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Juvenile Grey Butcherbird.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Banksia badangi 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

FPC[edit]

I liked one of your images so much that I nominated it for FPC! Commons:Featured_picture_candidates/Image:Stinkhorn_Springbrook.jpg. Adam Cuerden 10:08, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Aye, weel, I suppose I and he just have a slightly different view of FP - I think that for extremely poorly-covered subjects (ARE there even any fungi FPs?) that raising the bar too high causes them to get no recognition, and thus no moves to make more good-quality images. Adam Cuerden 00:05, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Geastrum 20070721.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Lycaon 20:59, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Great pictures![edit]

Hi Mike - just wanted to say three things. Firstly, great pictures. Secondly, you might like to update your picture at Eveleigh to call it a "traverser", not a "traveller" - traverser is apparently the correct term for it (the Government report on Eveleigh redevelopment calls it that). Thirdly, how did you take that picture of Milsons Point wharf without including the Harbour Bridge? That seems very difficult to do - it's like it almost isn't there. JROBBO (talk) 01:37, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I've changed it to traverser. Wharf without bridge involves a long-ish focal length and keeping the frame low enough to stay under the bridge. Also helps that the wharf is nearly under the bridge now (I'm sure it used to be nearer to Luna Park before). I've also linked it to the Wikipedia article and included a thumbnail there. WikiWookie (talk) 08:18, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The Sydney Monorail also has a traverser to transfer monorails between the main loop and the storage area - I'll try to get a good picture of that as well. WikiWookie (talk) 08:21, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eastern Bearded Dragon Gulgong.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Looks ok to me. A bit of CAs in the corners, but still ok. --Eusebius 10:24, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Metal stair in the Rocks Sydney.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Maybe I'm biased as a Sydneysider, but it looks good to me, and the difficult lighting was well managed. --99of9 02:22, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tenterfield PO 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Where in the Rocks?[edit]

Hey Mike... Where in the Rocks did you take the picture of the stairs?

Easiest way to see is click on the location link - Google maps works ok. I'll try to remember to add the street name to the description too. 101.170.127.227 04:33, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Updated the description and adjusted the location. It now works well in Google Maps. Stairs are on the eastern side of Lower Fort St just north from the Hero of Waterloo. Mike Young (WikiWookie) (talk) 04:04, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2016 is open![edit]

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2016 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear WikiWookie,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2016 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eleventh edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2016) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 20 April 2017, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
--Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 08:43, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey[edit]

WMF Surveys, 18:21, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey[edit]

WMF Surveys, 01:20, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey[edit]

WMF Surveys, 00:29, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 00:58, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 15:17, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done Mike Young (WikiWookie) (talk) 01:31, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 19:56, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]