Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Biblioteca Vasconcelos, Ciudad de México, México, 2015-07-20, DD 16-18 HDR.JPG
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Biblioteca Vasconcelos, Ciudad de México, México, 2015-07-20, DD 16-18 HDR.JPG, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Aug 2015 at 15:51:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
- Info A very interesting view of Vasconcelos library in Mexico City. Very high level of detail and resolution. Created and uploaded by Diego Delso. Nominated by -- ArildV (talk) 15:51, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
- Support -- ArildV (talk) 15:51, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
- Support Uhuauh! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:28, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
- Support Indeed, a great motif to take a picture of :) I was fascinated by this place, that can host up to 5000 people. Thanks for the nomination Arild! Poco2 16:42, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
- Support However, I preffer the version where you are there --The Photographer (talk) 16:50, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
- Not really sure that I can improve the picture with me in it :) Poco2 16:53, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
- Its not because are you, its because the humman body could be used to percibe the size --The Photographer (talk) 16:57, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
- Aha, I should have supposed that :) Well, I think that the size of a average book is more or less familiar. Poco2 17:43, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
- I have no idea which images you are discussing (therefore, very difficult to follow for the rest of us), but I think the people on the floor here tell us about the size of the library.--ArildV (talk) 17:51, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
- I published a picture of myself in Facebook in the library Poco2 18:05, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
- I have no idea which images you are discussing (therefore, very difficult to follow for the rest of us), but I think the people on the floor here tell us about the size of the library.--ArildV (talk) 17:51, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
- Aha, I should have supposed that :) Well, I think that the size of a average book is more or less familiar. Poco2 17:43, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
- Its not because are you, its because the humman body could be used to percibe the size --The Photographer (talk) 16:57, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Tomascastelazo (talk) 18:22, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
nice composition, but soft, and the people walking at the base of the photo have pretty bad motion blur. --Pine✉ 18:39, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, but I think that is not a very informed critique: Have you looked at the size of the image? This is not a 10MP image, so of course it will not be as pixel sharp. Also the blurred people are probably an effort to make them less distracting. If anything, they serve as a reference for the size of the location, but making them sharp would not make this a better photo of the library imho. --DXR (talk) 19:06, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
- No, it is not a 10 MPx, but a 47 MPx image. Still, I saw room for sharpening and have uploaded a new version, but cannot share this critique. Poco2 19:22, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
- I agree, not a valid critique really, but there are ways of avoiding people in the scene as we've discussed in the other nomination of Poco's. I think he should consider using that technique in future as it would help. The blurry people are inconsequential though in this image IMO. Diliff (talk) 19:46, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
- Weak support after sharpening. I'm still a bit bothered by the moving people, but at least one of my two concerns has been addressed. --Pine✉ 20:17, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, but I think that is not a very informed critique: Have you looked at the size of the image? This is not a 10MP image, so of course it will not be as pixel sharp. Also the blurred people are probably an effort to make them less distracting. If anything, they serve as a reference for the size of the location, but making them sharp would not make this a better photo of the library imho. --DXR (talk) 19:06, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Ralf Roleček 19:38, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
- Support. Very nice. Excellent composition. A bit noisy (not sure what ISO was used as the EXIF data is wiped) but still great. Diliff (talk) 19:45, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
- Also another issue on second viewing... Edges of high contrast have strong aliasing. I guess it's due to the HDR processing. And the highlights that I imagine should look basically white are a slightly dull grey (indicating you brought the highlights down a bit too far). Diliff (talk) 19:49, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
- Support Excellent composition --LivioAndronico (talk) 20:24, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
- Support ■ MMXX talk 21:05, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
- Support. Very good composition. --Dэя-Бøяg 00:36, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- Support The Wikimania 2015 venue that might have been. Daniel Case (talk) 02:38, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- Support Nicely done :) --Laitche (talk) 06:03, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- Support great! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:12, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- Support — Julian H.✈ 08:02, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- Support -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 09:10, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- Support Staggering. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 12:16, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- Support --El Grafo (talk) 12:18, 14 August 2015 (UTC) reminds me of a Borg ship for some reason …
- Support --Tremonist (talk) 14:11, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- Support--Vikoula5 (talk) 14:28, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
- Support you are on fire or something. - Benh (talk) 10:38, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
- haha, this is the beginning, I am just ramping up :) Poco2 12:02, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 12:52, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture