I don't like these wide angle distortions, but QI criteria is fulfilled. --Smial 15:01, 13 January 2015 (UTC) I tend to agree, but I was curious to try the new lens here. I prefer the result from my old antique 24mm here. Thank you for reviewing. --ArildV 15:11, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
Good quality. --Hubertl 22:00, 21 January 2015 (UTC) Comment Good, but before the promotion, a dust spot needs to be cloned out. I left a note. --Halavar 22:35, 22 January 2015 (UTC) Done, thanks.--ArildV 22:59, 22 January 2015 (UTC) Support Good now. QI for me --Halavar 23:27, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!
Don't think anyone will object me linking the image's creator. How do you manage to get such good aerial shots? Other person I know who does them is a pilot, but I've also seen them done with balloons or model aircraft. You should join en-wiki's Featured pictures: You have a lot of great stuff that could easily be added to en-wiki articles. =) Adam Cuerden (talk) 10:24, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
Thank you! All my aerial images was taken from a chartered helicopter and we had a very interested and helpful pilot in Stockholm. The flight was sponsored by Wikimedia Sweden. We have sponsored a number of flights in different parts of Sweden. There are for example very nice pictures from Luleå taken by a another user.--ArildV (talk) 17:05, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
That's a lot of great looking stuff. Will have to check through. Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:15, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
Comment Some pincushion distortion judging from the floor tiles. Is it HDR? --C messier 17:57, 11 February 2015 (UTC) Done No, its a single exposure. --ArildV 19:23, 11 February 2015 (UTC) Support OK for me. --C messier 16:27, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
Good quality. --Hubertl 11:07, 15 February 2015 (UTC) Comment CAs (see note) --Christian Ferrer 15:05, 15 February 2015 (UTC) Please add a better note, because I cant see any CA. Where did you see it?--ArildV 16:57, 15 February 2015 (UTC) Done new notes, nice mood but maybe the shadows are a bit dark --Christian Ferrer 18:01, 15 February 2015 (UTC) Thank you for your help! I uploaded a new version, without (I hope) CA and with more exposure.--ArildV 19:06, 15 February 2015 (UTC) Support good!) --Christian Ferrer 19:10, 15 February 2015 (UTC)