Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lake Tenaya in Yosemite NP.jpg

File:Lake Tenaya in Yosemite NP .jpg, featured

Voting period ends on 29 Mar 2009 at 17:30:12

•  Info everything by Mbz1 -- Mbz1 (talk) 17:30, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Mbz1 (talk) 17:30, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Question Are you God? ;) Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 17:37, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

•  Support Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 17:37, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

* Support Looks very slightly tilted CCW, but it's probably just the way the uneven shoreline messes with my perception of the horizon. --Notyourbroom (talk) 20:57, 20 March 2009 (UTC) Removed support because the "Edit 1" version has sufficient support to become a FP.

•  Comment - Maybe so, but the picture would benefict from a slight CW tilt, even if formally incorrect. I found the composition a bit boring, with the horizon dead centered in the frame. A little crop on top? I'm not sure it works. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 02:20, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Support A great photo of mother nature. --Korman (talk) 05:00, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Support —kallerna™ 14:54, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Böhringer (talk) 23:39, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Support I agree. --Karel (talk) 19:45, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Wow --sevela.p (talk) 00:40, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 10:09, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose, I can't help but feel the white balance is a bit off. --Aqwis (talk) 17:15, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

result: 8 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Mywood (talk) 11:48, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Edit 1 Alvesgaspar suggestion, not featured

•  Support--Mbz1 (talk) 14:42, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Support - Much better now -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 15:46, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Support I like this one better, but I will support either. --Notyourbroom (talk) 18:47, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Yes. --Karel (talk) 19:44, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Much better indeed --Muhammad 05:30, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Doucus (talk) 10:53, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Support A fantastic photograph. Bidgee (talk) 13:22, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose sorry - poor optic quality, big CA. Also don't composition - seems too flat and too tightly cropped at top (original is much better). But I think it is really great place :) --Dmitry A. Mottl (talk) 22:53, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose, I can't help but feel the white balance is a bit off. --Aqwis (talk) 17:15, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose I prefer the original. Can't we have a happy medium? Tilt, but no crop. Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 00:19, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

The original nomination is clossed already. I'm not sure I have the right to overwrite the image with a new version at this point, or do I? Thank you.--Mbz1 (talk) 01:16, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

result: 7 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. (the orignal one has higher support) Mywood (talk) 11:48, 1 April 2009 (UTC)