User:The High Fin Sperm Whale/Image promotions

Featured pictures

---

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Bicheno Seascape 2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bicheno Seascape 2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

---

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Calliphora hilli.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Calliphora hilli.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

---

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Strepera fuliginosa 1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Strepera fuliginosa 1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

---

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:A591 road, Lake District - June 2009.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:A591 road, Lake District - June 2009.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

---

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:L'Oceanografic, Valencia, Spain 2 - Jan 07.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:L'Oceanografic, Valencia, Spain 2 - Jan 07.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

---

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Different Slant on Orion (495636660).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Different Slant on Orion (495636660).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

---

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Haliaeetus leucocephalus LC0195 edit 1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Haliaeetus leucocephalus LC0195 edit 1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

---

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Alligator Crâne et Mandibule.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Alligator Crâne et Mandibule.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

---

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Anodorhynchus hyacinthinus -Hyacinth Macaw -side of head.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Anodorhynchus hyacinthinus -Hyacinth Macaw -side of head.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

---

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:SideriteBresil2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:SideriteBresil2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

---

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:FGM-148 Javelin - ID 061024-A-0497K-004.JPEG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:FGM-148 Javelin - ID 061024-A-0497K-004.JPEG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

---

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Mimas Cassini.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mimas Cassini.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

---

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Saturn with auroras.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Saturn with auroras.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

---

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Oryctolagus cuniculus Tasmania 2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Oryctolagus cuniculus Tasmania 2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

---

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Tursiops truncatus 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tursiops truncatus 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

---

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Sonnenblume Helianthus 2.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sonnenblume Helianthus 2.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

---

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Heart and Soul nebulae.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Heart and Soul nebulae.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

---

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Curculio nucum 01 (MK).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Curculio nucum 01 (MK).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

---

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Deepwater Horizon oil spill - May 24, 2010.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Deepwater Horizon oil spill - May 24, 2010.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

---

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Tantalum single crystal and 1cm3 cube.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tantalum single crystal and 1cm3 cube.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

---

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:790106-0203 Voyager 58M to 31M reduced.gif, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:790106-0203 Voyager 58M to 31M reduced.gif has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

---

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Red eyed tree frog edit2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Red eyed tree frog edit2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

---

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:20080406165033!V-22 Osprey refueling edit1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:20080406165033!V-22 Osprey refueling edit1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

---

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Dolomite-Magnésite- Navarre.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dolomite-Magnésite- Navarre.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

---

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Sydney Harbour Bridge from Circuilar Quay.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sydney Harbour Bridge from Circuilar Quay.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

---

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:ESO - The Carina Nebula (by).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:ESO - The Carina Nebula (by).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

---

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Jet engine.svg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Jet engine.svg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

---

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:MarsPanoramaa.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:MarsPanoramaa.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

---

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:STS115 Atlantis undock ISS.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:STS115 Atlantis undock ISS.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

---

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Steam Phase eruption of Castle geyser with double rainbow.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Steam Phase eruption of Castle geyser with double rainbow.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

---

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Nikon D200 front (aka).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Nikon D200 front (aka).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

---

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Crocuta crocuta.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Crocuta crocuta.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

---

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Tockus leucomelas 1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tockus leucomelas 1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

---

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Tragelaphus_strepsiceros_♂_(head).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tragelaphus_strepsiceros_♂_(head).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

---

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Sarychev Peak.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sarychev Peak.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

---

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:300° Diedamskopf Panorama.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:300° Diedamskopf Panorama.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

---

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:USA 10187 Horseshoe Bend Luca Galuzzi 2007.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:USA 10187 Horseshoe Bend Luca Galuzzi 2007.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

---

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Babyrousa_celebensis_-_Crane.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Babyrousa_celebensis_-_Crane.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

---

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Calliphora vomitoria Portrait.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Calliphora vomitoria Portrait.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

---

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Animated gun turret.gif, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Animated gun turret.gif has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

---

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Sepia latimanus (Reef cuttlefish) dark coloration.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sepia latimanus (Reef cuttlefish) dark coloration.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

---

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Microcarbo melanoleucos Austins Ferry 3.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Microcarbo melanoleucos Austins Ferry 3.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

---

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Adansonia grandidieri04.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Adansonia grandidieri04.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Valued images

---

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mesolite.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Specimens in a public collection clearly identified. Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 20:05, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:12, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

---

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Olympus FE-310.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Question Why does this camera in particular is notable enough to warrant a scope? The scope seems pretty narrow to me. --Eusebius (talk) 10:13, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
  • We have some other VI that are in the scope of a specific type of camera (see File:Yashica mat 124G - WLF ouvert.jpg and File:Leica M1.jpg)
    •  Support The Yashica was about a whole series which is quite significant, and there is a Wikipedia article about the Leica M1. I see it is also the case about this model, so I assume, as usual, that if a subject is worth a WP article, then it is worth a VI scope. I'm not sure it's worth a WP article, but well, I'm not a WP editor :-) FYI we have several other camera scopes, but in the cases I have in mind, an explanation was provided about why the scope was notable enough. All criteria ok. --Eusebius (talk) 20:03, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ikar.us (talk) 11:49, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

---

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Avro Lancaster.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Oppose as not yet eligible for VI status. Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it cannot at present become a valued image since it currently fails valued image criterion 5 (should be geocoded, but is not). "All images are expected to be geocoded unless it would not be appropriate to do so". I have not reviewed the nomination against all the criteria, but if you are able to fix this issue and would like me to re-evaluate the image please leave me a message on my talk page. -- Lycaon (talk) 06:08, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

• For a plane in front of sky without ground? --Ikar.us (talk) 09:46, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
  • I agree. Geocoding should add something to images it's required for. It's hard to see how an image of a moving object, with no identifiable landmarks in the image, would be improved in any way. I suppose we could give the airfield it flies out of, which could be valuable, but I don't think it's necessary, and hence  Support as (arguably) best in scope. [We may want an MVR on this: There's a lot of good ones]. Adam Cuerden (talk) 23:20, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
•  Support I agree that geocoding here is meaningless. Yann (talk) 15:16, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. Ikar.us (talk) 09:16, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

---

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mimas.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support The best we have for this scope. Yann (talk) 15:21, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:43, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

---

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Messier 87.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best for this scope. Yann (talk) 07:40, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 03:43, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

---

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
MS 0735.6+7421.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support The best for this scope. Yann (talk) 10:12, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 03:44, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

---

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lunar phases.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Hard to beat this one. Kleuske (talk) 21:09, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 22:34, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

---

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Castillo in Chichén Itzá.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best view in the category. Location adjusted. --Ikar.us (talk) 10:36, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:19, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

---

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Turbojet engines.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support For this subject, complicated, a drawing is more didactic. No geocoding possible. Legend in several languages. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:39, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:30, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

---

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Branta canadensis (Canadian Goose), family.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:12, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Myrabella (talk) 23:39, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

---

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Focus stacking.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Oppose as not yet eligible for VI status. Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it cannot at present become a valued image since it currently fails valued image criterion 5 (should be geocoded, but is not). "All images are expected to be geocoded unless it would not be appropriate to do so". I have not reviewed the nomination against all the criteria, but if you are able to fix this issue and would like me to re-evaluate the image please leave me a message on my talk page. --Rastaman3000 (talk) - Visit my new user-page! 15:30, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
•  Strong support It well illustrates the focus stacking technique, instead of object. Any object can be used. There is no necessity for geocode in this case. Very encyclopedic -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:52, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

After reading your comment, I've decided to remove my vote. --Rastaman3000 (talk) - Visit my new user-page! 15:00, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

•  Comment Was not well categorized for this scope then (criterion 6), but instead of opposing for that motive, I've added Category:Focus stacking... ;-) Further note to nominator : Please link to the relevant Commons gallery or category when it exists, in order to ease review; see Commons:Valued image scope#Links in the scope --Myrabella (talk) 12:52, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:16, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

---

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Golden Ears (peaks).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:12, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:06, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

---

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
IC 3568 (Lemon slice nebula).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment I would add its "vernacular name" (Lemon slice nebula) to the scope, between parentheses, like the vernacular name of animals and plants. OK otherwise. --Eusebius (talk) 05:23, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
  •  Done --The High Fin Sperm Whale 22:30, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Support OK for me. --Eusebius (talk) 05:38, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:44, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

---

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Torbernite.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:48, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:47, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

---

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Turbofan aircraft engine.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Used in 13 articles on 8 projects; meets other criteria except not geocoded and satisfies the diagrams exception. The png version is used an additional 18 times. Walter Siegmund (talk) 16:05, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Good profile, educational valuable. --Mile (talk) 08:22, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:48, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

---

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Great Red Spot.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Does seem the best in an admittedly fairly narrow scope. Adam Cuerden (talk) 13:01, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:07, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

---

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sympetrum internum (Cherry-faced Meadowhawk).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Pretty clearly best in scope, though I like the one with the four-spotted chaser better as art. Adam Cuerden (talk) 13:12, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Support All criteria met, though it would be better to have the sex of the shown specimen established. --Quartl (talk) 16:31, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:31, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

---

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Libellula forensis (Eight-spotted Skimmer), adult male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Question Could File:Dragonfly ran-579 Whitetail f.jpg be a better illustration of the subject? -- King of Hearts (talk) 00:48, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Perhaps, if it were geocoded. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 00:37, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
    • But assuming that the other picture is more valuable, then it doesn't have to be geocoded to be considered for opposing this nom. I'm not saying it is more valuable, as both have their advantages and disadvantages. This one has more resolution and shows more of the habitat; the other one offers a more direct angle-of-view. I can't decide at this point, so let's wait for someone else to make the call. -- King of Hearts (talk) 00:55, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Comment Now, isn't this rather Libellula forensis? --Quartl (talk) 18:42, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Incorrect identification IMO. I agree with User:Quartl -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:36, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
• Quartl, you were right. It is Libellula forensis. I have changed the scope. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 16:31, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
  • On second thought, Archaeodontosaurus has proposed that it is Libellula pulchella. Please don't vote until I find which it is. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 16:43, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
    • L. pulchella has brown wingtips. --Quartl (talk) 17:05, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
    • Yes for Libellula forensis! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:59, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
      • I also took it to the Science reference desk and it is indeed Libellula forensis. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 18:02, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Support criteria met now, correct ID -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:02, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Support now. -- King of Hearts (talk) 05:54, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Support as well. --Quartl (talk) 06:30, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

Result: 3 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Myrabella (talk) 06:49, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

---

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Giant's Causeway.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support good Cody escadron delta (talk) 09:26, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ikar.us (talk) 21:03, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

---

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
FujiFilm FinePix Z33WP.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Not much to choose but good photo. --Mile (talk) 15:29, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

 Support Agree with Mile --Extra 999 (Contact ^me + _contribs) 11:17, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:10, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

---

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Antelope Canyon.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Rich scope and good choice.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:47, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Lycaon (talk) 07:08, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

---

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sylvilagus floridanus (Eastern Cottontail).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Good reason, all criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Myrabella (talk) 06:25, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

---

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bridal Veil Falls (British Columbia).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Request I suggest to narrow the scope to "Bridal Veil Falls": the image depicts the falls, not the whole park. --Myrabella (talk) 08:22, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
  •  Done --The High Fin Sperm Whale 16:11, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
•  Support OK to me, all criteria met. --Myrabella (talk) 22:59, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:41, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

---

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mount Robie Reid.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:44, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:34, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

---

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fossil Ursus spelaeus, skull.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Neutral - IMO this image does not illustrate well the scope, as it only shows a skull. On the other hand, adding 'skull' to the scope would probably make it too narrow. I'm neutral for now. --Rastaman3000 (talk) - Visit my new user-page! 17:41, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

• Changed scope. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 19:33, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Support the new scope is perfect --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 03:25, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:41, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

---

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aleuria aurantia (Orange Peel Fungus).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Yes, this one is better IMO --George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:55, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Better view, shows spore surface as well as upper surface. Also, less obstructed. Walter Siegmund (talk) 22:54, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Comment Much better. I would have supported if if hadn't already opposed the other one. Lycaon (talk) 23:16, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

Scores: 
1. Orange peel fungus.JPG: +2
2. Aleuria aurantia (Orange Peel Fungus).JPG: -1
=>
File:Orange peel fungus.JPG: Promoted.
File:Aleuria aurantia (Orange Peel Fungus).JPG: Declined

--George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:26, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

---

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nikon D5000.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support - IMO illustrates the scope better. --Rastaman3000 (talk) - Visit my new user-page! 15:25, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

•  Support Shows the camera better (better perspective). The camera without lens is IMO not that relevant. Lycaon (talk) 23:18, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

 Support I prefer this perspective. Missionary (talk) 20:48, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

Scores: 
1. Nikon D5000 body.JPG: +1
2. Nikon D5000.jpg: +3
=>
File:Nikon D5000 body.JPG: Declined.
File:Nikon D5000.jpg: Promoted.

--George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:47, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

---

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Addax nasomaculatus (Addax).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:25, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Lycaon (talk) 15:32, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

---

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Zebu (Bos taurus indicus).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support. Best in scope, IMHO. Flávio "Maddox" ^go! 04:25, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:44, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

---

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Boletus chrysenteron (Red Cracking Bolete), spore print.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Maybe "Spore print" (generally speaking) could be a more relevant scope ? That is only a question, not a request to change, because I'm not a mycologist. Other question: is the Boletus chrysenteron spore print noticeable enough ? Different from other Boletus, other mushrooms ?--Jebulon (talk) 23:45, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

• • Boletus zelleri is quite close. However, this spore print is distinctive to boletes in that it is a honeycomb, and so forms many small dots, rather than lines radiating from the centre. So changing the scope to "Spore print" would be too broad; although changing it to "Boletus (Bolete), spore print" might be a good idea. And you may want to ask George to review this; he knows quite a bit about mushrooms. --The HighFin Sperm Whale 00:05, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
    • Thanks for answering. I knew there is some "honeycomb", and some "gills". Maybe a set with both ? It should be more interesting IMO. Well, I think this picture is interesting (and well done). I'm sure George will come soon to review this, without call ! But if you are in "trouble" with him, (are you ?) I may ask him for you if you want.--Jebulon (talk) 22:47, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
      • In trouble with him? What do you mean? If you are asking whether were mad at each other, we're not. Still, I would be happy if you would do that. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 01:18, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Done I don't understand why you cannot ask him for a review yourself, but I left a message on his talk page...Happy if it helps you --Jebulon (talk) 16:12, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Comment Scope is OK for me. The color of fungi spore dust is very valuable for identification. With adjusted color of this photo i will support. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:13, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
  •  Question What do you want done to the colours? --The High Fin Sperm Whale 22:02, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Support OK now --George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:04, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:21, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

---

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Boletus chrysenteron (Red Cracking Bolete).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support certainly no other image has quite the range of angles or visual detail from camera quality and studio shot. Jolly Janner (talk) 01:06, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:35, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

---

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hypholoma fasciculare (sulphur tuft).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:32, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

Scores: 
1. Pholiota aurivella and Hypholoma fasciculare 2010-10-13.jpg: +0
2. Hypholoma fasciculare LC0091.jpg: +1
=>
File:Pholiota aurivella and Hypholoma fasciculare 2010-10-13.jpg: Declined.
File:Hypholoma fasciculare LC0091.jpg: Promoted.

--George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:38, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

---

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Amanita citrina (False death cap), mature specimen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:47, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 22:25, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

---

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Russula brevipes (Short-stemmed russula).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:24, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:09, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

---

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Helvella lacunosa (Slate grey saddle).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:19, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:50, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

---

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Taricha granulosa (Rough-skinned newt).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Both are good but we must choose one. This for me ! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:44, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Support I think this one illustrates "[w]hen viewed from above, the eyes of T. granulosa do not protrude beyond the profile of the head."[1] This distinguishes it from Taricha torosa. Walter Siegmund (talk) 22:51, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Best in Scope --George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:17, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

Scores: 
1. Rough-skinned newt (Taricha granulosa).JPG: +0
2. Taricha granulosa (Rough-skinned newt).JPG: +3
=>
File:Rough-skinned newt (Taricha granulosa).JPG: Declined.
File:Taricha granulosa (Rough-skinned newt).JPG: Promoted.

--George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:53, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

---

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Calendula officinalis (Pot marigold), flower.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment The description on the file page is incomplete. It does not include the species. The uploader did not assign a species to the subject, so a note on identification may be helpful since the bracts are not visible and the leaves are not in focus. Walter Siegmund (talk) 05:06, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

 Done I have added the species name as per request. Thomas888b (talk) 18:25, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

•  Support Criteria satisfied. Walter Siegmund (talk) 19:01, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:07, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Valued image sets

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Types of volcanic eruptions.

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Types of volcanic eruptions.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Very informative. -- King of Hearts (talk) 04:08, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>

promoted. -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:32, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality images

---

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! McDonnell Douglas FA-18F Super Hornet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me! --Jovianeye 04:07, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

---

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nieuport 17 at Festival of History 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments very good --Ianare 04:39, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

---

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hippo skull.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments not perfect but imo QI --Mbdortmund 19:28, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

---

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nikon D300s - Front Mk2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments sharp, well exposed QI IMO --Croucrou 21:59, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

---

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canon EOS 5D Mark II with 50mm 1.4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good, but why with this haze filter? -- Smial 22:19, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

---

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Takenohama Hyogo001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Lovely view. That's where I want to be right now :) WikiLaurent 18:52, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

---

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canada Goose -Branta canadensis.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

---

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Black-tailed Deer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

---

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ba b747-400 g-bnle arp.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I prefer Airbus, but good pic nevertheless.--Jebulon 00:01, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

---

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jet engine.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI and very useful! --Jovianeye 01:48, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

---

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Four-spotted Chaser (Libellula quadrimaculata).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good to me. --Quartl 07:19, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

---

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eight-spotted Skimmer (Libellula forensis).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

---

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Desiccation-cracks hg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Interesting and good made --Haneburger 05:56, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

---

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eastern Cottontail (Sylvilagus floridanus).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. Lycaon 07:00, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

---

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Four-spotted Chaser -(Libellula quadrimaculata).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good, and good DOF--Lmbuga 08:18, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

---

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bridal Veil Falls, BC, Canada.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments very good--Jebulon 22:31, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

---

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Using sextant swing.gif, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Yes. Very good. Technically good and of course encyclopedic useful. --High Contrast 22:47, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

---

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Water cascades at Bridal Veil Falls.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 20:35, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

---

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bottom of Rainbow falls.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --George Chernilevsky 06:14, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

---

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pholiota squarrosa 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 05:58, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

---

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pholiota aurivella 2010-10-06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Also good. --Cayambe 14:35, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

---

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pholiota aurivella and Hypholoma fasciculare 2010-10-13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --George Chernilevsky 07:03, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

---

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --George Chernilevsky 08:05, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

---

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barbary Sheep (Ammotragus lervia).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments best of the four... but however: where is a sperm whale photo?? ;-) --Carschten 10:08, 16 October 2010 (UTC)  Comment To me, too sharp, but i'm not sure to decline it--Lmbuga 19:30, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

---

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Addax (Addax nasomaculatus).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --George Chernilevsky 08:03, 16 October 2010 (UTC)  Comment To me, the noise of the background are disturbing (at real size), but i'm not sure to decline it--Lmbuga 19:32, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

---

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zebu.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 08:35, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

---

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Russula spec. 2010-10-13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me, although "infested" implies the slugs are still there. --Avenue 03:10, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

---

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boletus chrysenteron (Red Cracking Bolete).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good... appetite :-) --Cayambe 08:30, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

---

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moon with 22° halo.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Because of the difficult (night) conditions.--Mbz1 03:51, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

---

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amanita sp. 2010-10-31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Cayambe 07:20, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

---

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aleuria aurantia (Orange Peel Fungus).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me --George Chernilevsky 09:09, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

---

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Red Cracking Bolete (Boletus chrysenteron) spore print.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Print is reasonable, image is good. QI to me. --Avenue 10:06, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

---

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saltation.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good composition and nice demonstration of the subject. --AFBorchert 22:47, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

---

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elfin saddle.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments If it is not noise, but texture (I think so), it smells like a future FP, IMO... --Jebulon 01:06, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

---

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rough-skinned newt (Taricha granulosa).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 07:38, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

---

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Taricha granulosa (Rough-skinned newt).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 07:38, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

---

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Southwold Sea Front.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Why the small size? --Dschwen 19:18, 4 January 2011 (UTC) Since when has 2 MP been small? --The High Fin Sperm Whale 20:00, 4 January 2011 (UTC) Gee, only like 5 years or so. --Dschwen 23:22, 4 January 2011 (UTC) Small for a QI, but still above the bar. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 06:05, 5 January 2011 (UTC) Small but decent. Mattbuck 12:53, 11 January 2011 (UTC)