User talk:ArildV/Archive 2015

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dockmästarbostället January 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 00:05, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Slakthusområdet January 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Very good quality. --Dnalor 01 11:31, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Typhon 16 January 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Very good quality. --Dnalor 01 11:29, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stockholm Public Library January 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Very good quality. --Dnalor 01 11:29, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Smålandsgatan January 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 16:52, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dockmästarbostället January 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 13:31, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stockholm Public Library January 2015 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Dnalor 01 12:02, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stockholm Public Library January 2015 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Dnalor 01 12:02, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sergels torg 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good quality. Please remove the spot in the notes. --DXR 08:31, 10 January 2015 (UTC) Thank you, new version uploaded.--ArildV 18:59, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Västerlånggatan January 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:44, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sergels torg 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 20:35, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Universitetet metro station January 2015 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:08, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Universitetet metro station January 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:08, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Universitetet metro station January 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:08, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kungsholms kyrka January 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:48, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Strömmen January 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, fine impression. --Dnalor 01 11:01, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hamngatan January 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Probably somewhat too high color saturation. --Smial 15:01, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Birger Jarlspassagen January 2015 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I don't like these wide angle distortions, but QI criteria is fulfilled. --Smial 15:01, 13 January 2015 (UTC) I tend to agree, but I was curious to try the new lens here. I prefer the result from my old antique 24mm here. Thank you for reviewing. --ArildV 15:11, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Universitetet metro station January 2015 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:24, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Götgatan January 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:42, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Djurgårdsvarvet January 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:42, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bergshamra metro station January 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 16:12, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Strandvägen January 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 09:00, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Djurgårdsvarvet January 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Very sharp, perfect quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:41, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bergshamra metro station January 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:39, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lilla Sickla January 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 12:55, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beckholmen January 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 11:42, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hammarbytoppen January 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. :-) --XRay 08:32, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sjövägen January 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:32, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Sergels torg 2015 02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sergels torg 2015 02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:03, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frej January 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:18, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blasieholmstorg January 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Very good quality. --Dnalor 01 16:24, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Djurgårdsvarvet January 2015 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 22:00, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Good, but before the promotion, a dust spot needs to be cloned out. I left a note. --Halavar 22:35, 22 January 2015 (UTC) Done, thanks.--ArildV 22:59, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good now. QI for me --Halavar 23:27, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stadion metro station January 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 19:09, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stadion metro station January 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 19:28, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Markuskyrkan January 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --DKrieger 20:22, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Farsta metro station January 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 16:11, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bagarmossen metro station January 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 18:15, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Slussen January 2015 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 09:29, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Birger Jarlspassagen January 2015 02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Birger Jarlspassagen January 2015 02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:02, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Taken with Nikkor AF 70-200/2.8G AF-S ED VR II has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Jwh (talk) 18:45, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Södra Hammarbyhamnen January 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:58, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Hammarbykanalen January 2015.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hammarbykanalen January 2015.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:02, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Börshuset January 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Beautiful mood, excellent quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:10, 01 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tele2 Arena January 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI for me. --Johann Jaritz 07:13, 01 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Katarinavägen January 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Universitetet metro station January 2015 04.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Universitetet metro station January 2015 04.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:06, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zara Home Stockholm January 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:40, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Markuskyrkan January 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK --Pleclown 12:33, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Don't think anyone will object me linking the image's creator. How do you manage to get such good aerial shots? Other person I know who does them is a pilot, but I've also seen them done with balloons or model aircraft. You should join en-wiki's Featured pictures: You have a lot of great stuff that could easily be added to en-wiki articles. =) Adam Cuerden (talk) 10:24, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! All my aerial images was taken from a chartered helicopter and we had a very interested and helpful pilot in Stockholm. The flight was sponsored by Wikimedia Sweden. We have sponsored a number of flights in different parts of Sweden. There are for example very nice pictures from Luleå taken by a another user.--ArildV (talk) 17:05, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
That's a lot of great looking stuff. Will have to check through. Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:15, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vaxholmsleden February 2013 02 (crop).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Dnalor 01 11:29, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Katarina kyrka February 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Villy Fink Isaksen 20:44, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Katarina kyrka February 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:43, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kungsholms kyrka February 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 18:34, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Estoniakors Erstaterrassen February 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:27, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stockholms stadshus February 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:27, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gullmarsplan Metro station February 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:58, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nyköpingshus Febuary 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:24, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Botvids kyrka February 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:05, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nyköping Teater February 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 08:59, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Botvids kyrka February 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kadellar 16:39, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nyköping February 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 18:37, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nyköpingshus Feburary 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 11:02, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bryggeriet Nyköping February 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 10:00, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frösängskapellet Febrary 2015 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 10:12, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norr Mälarstrand February 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I think it is okay now. The hut at the left looks a bit tilted but that might well be reality. --DXR 19:05, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Vaxholmsleden February 2013 02 (crop).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vaxholmsleden February 2013 02 (crop).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:03, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nyköping February 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good now --DXR 16:02, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frösängskapellet February 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good for me. --Hockei 16:38, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tingshuset February 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:14, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Botvids kyrka February 2015 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Some pincushion distortion judging from the floor tiles. Is it HDR? --C messier 17:57, 11 February 2015 (UTC)✓ Done No, its a single exposure. --ArildV 19:23, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Support OK for me. --C messier 16:27, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Söderstadion January 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Nicolai kyrka February 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 11:42, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tingshuset February 2015 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:46, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Nicolai kyrka February 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:25, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Svartensgatan February 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 11:07, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment CAs (see note) --Christian Ferrer 15:05, 15 February 2015 (UTC) Please add a better note, because I cant see any CA. Where did you see it?--ArildV 16:57, 15 February 2015 (UTC)✓ Done new notes, nice mood but maybe the shadows are a bit dark --Christian Ferrer 18:01, 15 February 2015 (UTC) Thank you for your help! I uploaded a new version, without (I hope) CA and with more exposure.--ArildV 19:06, 15 February 2015 (UTC)  Support good!) --Christian Ferrer 19:10, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sparbankshuset Nyköping February 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:55, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sparbankshuset Nyköping February 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 16:23, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ai ai ai[edit]

Be carefull when you ping someone, you put my user page in your nomination :) -- ChristianFerrer 18:10, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, my mistake. Thank you for your review and support.--ArildV (talk) 20:01, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Löten September 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 22:18, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bromstens skola September 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 13:34, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Snösätra February 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:53, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Snösätra February 2015 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 09:51, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Botvids kyrka February 2015 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good detail; striking composition --Daniel Case 07:00, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kulturama January 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 15:40, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tingshuset February 2015 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments --Famberhorst 16:32, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bryggeriet Nyköping February 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 01:45, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Löten September 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 09:43, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Botvids kyrka February 2015 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I agree, new version uploaded. Thank you--ArildV 10:42, 17 February 2015 (UTC) Good quality. --Moroder 12:07, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gamla Oxelösund February 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Beautiful composition. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:26, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Högalidskyrkan September 2014 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 13:51, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nyköpingshus Feburary 2015 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:36, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nyköpingshus Feburary 2015 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:38, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Berliner Fernsehturm November 2013.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2003:45:4758:F16B:819:B43D:8131:F3C5 17:35, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ArildV! Please join the WikiProject Sports. Good luck! --NaBUru38 (talk) 22:35, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Djurgårdsstaden Mars 2015 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:41, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Djurgårdsstaden Mars 2015 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:41, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Djurgårdsstaden Mars 2015 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 08:04, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Djurgårdsstaden Mars 2015 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 13:03, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villa NK Nyköping February 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Thibaut120094 12:27, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Djurgårdsstaden Mars 2015 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Overall good quality but the right side is leaning in slightly. --Cccefalon 08:03, 5 March 2015 (UTC)✓ Done thank you.--ArildV 11:18, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:22, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Djurgårdsstaden Mars 2015 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Overall good quality but right side is leaning in considerably. --Cccefalon 08:10, 5 March 2015 (UTC) ✓ Done thank you for review, new version uploaded with tilt and perspective correction.--ArildV 11:11, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:22, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Färentuna September 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me, even when I think that it is a bit oversaturated. third opinion appreciated. --Hubertl 11:06, 12 March 2015 (UTC) I will see tonight with a better monitor. --ArildV 11:11, 12 March 2015 (UTC)✓ Done new version uploaded.--ArildV 19:22, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Djurgårdsstaden Mars 2015 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 17:45, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bandy[edit]

The men's bandy game was played on 14 March 2015. J 1982 (talk) 10:13, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done--ArildV (talk) 10:54, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kareby IS-AIK, 13 mars 2015 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A bit dark, but good --Poco a poco 13:21, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kareby IS-AIK, 13 mars 2015 (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Left crop suboptimal, but good overall --Poco a poco 13:13, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sandvikens AIK vs Västerås SK 2015-03-14 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 15:50, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sandvikens AIK vs Västerås SK 2015-03-14 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 15:50, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sandvikens AIK vs Västerås SK 2015-03-14 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:26, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Havrekvarnen 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Ximonic 13:43, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Havrekvarnen 2015 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:24, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Havrekvarnen 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:38, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ArildV, I upload a try for the crop for to show you of what I was thinking about, with also some minor level changes, please revert if you don't like. -- Christian Ferrer 18:12, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Christian,
Thank you for your new version. I sometimes use 5x4 crop (instead of the original 6x4 from D600) when I upload portrait format images (it makes the images fit better on Wikipedia, especially in the info boxes). i also like the format. But maybe I'm just a Large-format-wannabe --ArildV (talk) 20:25, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sandvikens AIK vs Västerås SK 2015-03-14 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality under the circumstances of sport event photography.. --Cccefalon 16:32, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nyköpingshus Feburary 2015 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Is it possible to clone out your shadow head ? --Christian Ferrer 21:54, 9 March 2015 (UTC) Sorry Christian, I forgot this images. I uploaded a new crop.--ArildV 08:46, 17 March 2015 (UTC)  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 11:53, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Djurgårdsstaden Mars 2015 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 04:01, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Söderstadion March 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 11:02, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nyköpingshus Feburary 2015 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:22, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sandvikens AIK vs Västerås SK 2015-03-14 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:22, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sandvikens AIK vs Västerås SK 2015-03-14 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:15, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sandvikens AIK vs Västerås SK 2015-03-14 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI 4 me. --Palauenc05 21:14, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gård Färingsö September 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 22:48, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Södra Hammarbyhamnen March 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:54, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Djurgårdsstaden Mars 2015 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 14:44, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kareby IS-AIK, 13 mars 2015 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support good even if it will be certainly better with a crop --Christian Ferrer 12:49, 19 March 2015 (UTC) ✓ Done thank you for better?--ArildV 07:57, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vrångö missionskyrka March 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A bit dark, but ok --Poco a poco 08:18, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feskekôrka March 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:34, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vrångö missionskyrka March 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK for QI --Isiwal 12:19, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wikimedia Sveriges årsmöte 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:37, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sandvikens AIK vs Västerås SK 2015-03-14 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 08:13, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sandvikens AIK vs Västerås SK 2015-03-14 45.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support some background noise, but IMHO acceptable. --C messier 17:56, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kvarteret Pallas March 2015 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 16:26, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Valla torg march 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI for me. --C messier 11:53, 26 March 2015 (UTC)  Support Good quality --Billy69150 18:19, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Masthuggskyrkan March 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 14:26, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ingenjörsgatan March 2015 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 14:26, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kungsladugård March 2015 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI for me--Lmbuga 15:31, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thulehuset March 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:32, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ringön March 2015 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:37, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ringön March 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:37, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ringön March 2015 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Lewis Hulbert 13:00, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ljungdalen April 2015 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 03:43, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ljungdalen April 2015 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:51, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ljungdalen April 2015 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI --Lewis Hulbert 12:07, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ljungdalen April 2015 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI for me--Lmbuga 13:53, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mariakyrkan April 2015 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:29, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Majorna March 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 08:16, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mariakyrkan April 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:47, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Påskrännet 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good. I would like more photo without people in the left side--Lmbuga 18:18, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ljungdalen April 2015 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 05:15, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mariakyrkan April 2015 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments ✓ Donethank you.--ArildV 17:11, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Good qualityItalic text

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mariakyrkan April 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 21:11, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kvarteret Oljekvarn March 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments than you for your review, I uploaded a new version.--ArildV 11:15, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Much better now. Good quality. --Slaunger 06:30, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ljungdalen April 2015 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Famberhorst 07:17, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ljungdalen April 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:20, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ljungdalen April 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Ales stenar[edit]

Hi ArildV,

In case it is still an option for you or Wikimedia Sweden to sponsor photography trips by helicopter or airplane, I would recommend taking aerial photos of sv:Ales stenar. I recently visited the place, and I find it very impressive, but also very hard to take good photos of from a ground-based vantage point as there are none nearby at a higher altitude. It occured to me that some fantastic shots ought to be possible for an air vehicle where the rather dramatic coastline could also be visualized. -- Slaunger (talk) 20:46, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
WMSE don't have a specific aerial photo project in 2015 but we may support through our extended community support program. Ales stenar is a great idea. The nearest helicopter base is probably Malmö Airport. There are several objects near, for example Ystad and Sandhammaren. Would you be interested to participate?--ArildV (talk) 21:18, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Arild, It sure would be interesting to participate, but it is not very practical for me. I live in sv:Viborg, two expensive bridges and more than 4 hours of driving from Malmö...
There are many other interesting objects in the area, such as the sv:Turning torso, Lund Cathedral, (the one we have in Viborg is a heavily inspired by its architecture, although built much more recently). There is also such a thing as sv:Lillgrunds vindkraftpark, although it may be too close to the approach and takeoff corridors for Copenhagen airport, or the partially reconstructed viking castle Trelleborg in Trelleborg. I stayed at a B&B a little East of Ystand, and here the host suggested a church marathon of 42 km biking to 7 impressive churches in the area. I saw quite a few of them, but did not take photos because the weather was rather terrible. Many of them would be interesting in aerial views as well. I went to Sandhamn as wll and has uploaded some pics. Saw 15 big flocks of migrating birds, and nice place overall (especially if the wether had been better). -- Slaunger (talk) 16:48, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Drottningholm April 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment CAs on the trees. See the note. --Halavar 08:51, 13 April 2015 (UTC) ✓ Done Thank you--ArildV 09:08, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good now. --Halavar 10:59, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Svanhuset April 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI -- Spurzem 08:01, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Götiska tornet April 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Lewis Hulbert 10:59, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Drottningholms slottskyrka April 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 08:51, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Drottningholm April 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 11:28, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Götiska tornet April 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and nice--Lmbuga 13:10, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Drottningholm April 2015 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:19, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Drottningholms slott April 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support WOW! Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 07:15, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torkilstöten April 2015 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 07:08, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Svanhuset April 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 07:11, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ljungdalen April 2015 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:27, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ljungdalen April 2015 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Nice and good--Lmbuga 18:18, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Drottningholms slottsteater April 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:40, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Drottningholms slottsteater April 2015 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:51, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torkilstöten April 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Nice and good--Lmbuga 20:40, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Öjön April 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good quality.--Famberhorst 15:38, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kvarnholmen March 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:46, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Götiska tornet April 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 18:32, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torkilstöten April 2015 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 12:50, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Drottningholms slottskyrka April 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 12:48, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mariakyrkan April 2015 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 11:34, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Majorna March 2015 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:18, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ältadalen March 2015 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 14:21, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ältadalen March 2015 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 14:21, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grindstugan April 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 09:12, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ljungan April 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments There is a small problem with the magenta; probably you forgot to switch on defringing. Also a slight tilt cw. --Cccefalon 07:17, 17 April 2015 (UTC)✓ Done Thank you.--ArildV 07:49, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Good quality. --Cccefalon 07:59, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torkilstöten April 2015 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Sky is not "burnt" --Moroder 17:18, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ältadalen March 2015 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice composition.--Johann Jaritz 07:05, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torkilstöten April 2015 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:57, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Archangel Michael at Bad Wörishofen[edit]

Hallo Arild, would you kindly look for Fresco of archangel Michael once more? Best regards -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 09:22, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Of course I will Best regards--ArildV (talk) 09:54, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 10:49, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ältadalen March 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 21:36, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Drottningholms slottsteater April 2015 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:20, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kyrkpaviljongen April 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:13, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torkilstöten April 2015 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Please add geocode --Moroder 06:50, 19 April 2015 (UTC)Thank you, geocodes added to all recent images from Ljungdalen/Torkilstöten.--ArildV 08:19, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mariakyrkan April 2015 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 06:14, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Öjön April 2015 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Smial 12:01, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Teaterplan April 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Smial 12:01, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oreälven April 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very beautiful and good quality -- Spurzem 11:45, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Drottningholms slottskyrka April 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 08:03, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Öjön April 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 08:03, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Drottningholm April 2015 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI -- Spurzem 19:54, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Drottningholm April 2015 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 19:51, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Teaterplan April 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:21, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Öjön April 2015 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I am overwhelmed by this gorgeous photograph.--Johann Jaritz 13:40, 22 April 2015 (UTC) Thank you very much for your kind words--ArildV 17:07, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torkilstöten April 2015 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 13:38, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Katarina kyrkobacke March 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Wow! What an image! Thank you for this fine picture. --Johann Jaritz 13:42, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oreälven April 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Another excellent photograph. And stunning motive. --Johann Jaritz 13:44, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Katarina kyrkobacke March 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 11:57, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Drottningholm April 2015 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good -- Spurzem 19:54, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The crop is not convincing for me (see note). In your version you have the path at 1/3 but it results in imho too many unimportant space in the foreground distracting from your main motive. --Tuxyso 20:09, 21 April 2015 (UTC) Thanks for review and comments. I can agree with the crop suggestion from a photographic point of view, but not necessarily from an educational. The open space is an important part of the park's design. --ArildV 08:36, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sandvikens AIK vs Västerås SK 2015-03-14 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice. Tighter frame would have been more impressive. --Kadellar 16:25, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kungsträdgården April 2015 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Kraft 21:46, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stockholm centralstation April 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:55, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riksbankshuset April 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Personally, I would have made a more pyramidal perspective correction at this large field of view. It looks 'over-corrected' by the eye although formally, the verticals are vertical. --Slaunger 17:55, 23 April 2015 (UTC) Thank you for review. I uploaded a alternative version without perspectiv correction. You can add it to the Danish article if you like--ArildV 18:47, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Haha, thanks for the new version. I think something in-between the two versions is the ideal. I normally stay of editing wikipedia articles regarding subjects I have little knowledge about, and this is one of them. I am primarily a media contributor. -- Slaunger 20:41, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Södra Hammarbyhamnen April 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 20:46, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Farsta gård April 2015 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 17:21, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Farsta gård April 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Hockei 17:10, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Good quality also, but see note, please. Nice picture--Lmbuga 17:19, 24 April 2015 (UTC)✓ Done Thank you both.--ArildV 18:22, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stockholm centralstation April 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 15:29, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kungsträdgården April 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Beautiful motive. Nice composition.--Johann Jaritz 05:50, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kungsträdgården Metro station April 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Dificult picture, but dark areas have too much contrast and are oversaturated IMO. CAs at right upper side.--Lmbuga 21:20, 23 April 2015 (UTC)Thank you. New version uploaded.--ArildV 06:18, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
QI for me--Lmbuga 13:40, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ältadalen March 2015 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 04:48, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rågsved April 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 04:50, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Farsta gård April 2015 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 21:36, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Farsta gård April 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:09, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Södra Hammarbyhamnen April 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice composition.--Johann Jaritz 04:52, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villa Bergsbo April 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 21:45, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nedre Manilla April 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 03:02, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Listonhill April 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 02:19, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Masthuggskyrkan March 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments ✓ Done Yes indeed.--ArildV 06:59, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Good quality. Perfekt! Thanks --Moroder 08:34, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thielska galleriet April 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 10:41, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beckholmen April 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:53, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Djurgårdsvarvet April 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:53, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dockmästarbostället April 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 10:40, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lugnets terrass April 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 08:11, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villa Mullberget April 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:41, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villa Ekarne April 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments looks fine --Denkmalhelfer 15:40, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Rissne Metro station September 2014.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rissne Metro station September 2014.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gröndal May 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 16:43, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stora Essingen May 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 16:43, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I voted support for this, which makes me the 7th support. However one of those supports is from LuisArmandoRasteletti, who you probably know, added his support to all 90 candidates in a row. He's blocked now. Since the user has never ever discussed anything on Commons, we don't know why he played this game. If this were my nomination, I'd either strike his "vote" as LivioAndronico has done on his own nominations, or withdraw my own support to compensate. I wouldn't feel happy with an image promoted just because someone played games at the weekend. There is still the possibility the image gets further supports. I know some disagree and think we should respect everyone's votes, but I don't feel this is actually a valid vote. It's like a spoiled ballot where a voter puts a cross against all the candidates. There has to be some images that are featured and some not. -- Colin (talk) 12:24, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't read the discussion regarding the user. I have been busy the last few week and to be honest I'm tired of reading some of the the recent discussions about FP and QI. Anyway, its a Wiki and we encourage users to be bold. So please strike the vote if you think the vote is illegitimate. I don't own the nomination, its not about me.
Slightly off-topic. As a long-time Wikipedian I dont think one single vote matter (or should matter). We reach consensus not only by editing, but also by not editing (because we approve or accept the current version/outcome). If the result is against the consensus, people will step in and vote against. If they are not doing it, they approve (and the outcome is not due to the individual vote). If that is not the case, we have much more serious problems than a single user.--ArildV (talk) 13:47, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I may well be bold with your permission (I do think you kind of "own" the nomination, as it is yours to create and withdraw as you see fit). We are in a position with PFC were a single vote can actually affect quite a number of nominations because the threshold 7 + 2/3 is not a large number. If we had a higher participant level at FP then of course one would be a drop in the ocean. -- Colin (talk) 13:53, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed we have a low participant level. But I think that for each nomination (except for those who get extremely strong support) we have 10-15 regular voters who have seen the nomination but opted not to vote. But they can choose (and I hope they would) to vote if they are not happy with the outcome. By the way, thanks for support.--ArildV (talk) 14:12, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luma April 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 14:53, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luma May 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 13:48, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Drottningholms slottsteater May 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --MB-one 12:55, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Drottningholms slottsteater May 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 11:58, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tjörnbron September 2014 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 11:54, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Tjörnbron September 2014 02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tjörnbron September 2014 02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gröndal May 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 15:01, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nitrolackfabriken May 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 09:13, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ljungdalen April 2015 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 06:18, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Ljungdalen April 2015 12.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ljungdalen April 2015 12.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May you[edit]

explain this edit. Just changed to "promotion", no other explaination, no signature? Thanks! --Hubertl (talk) 04:18, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I just forgot to copy my signature.--ArildV (talk) 04:24, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Slussen May 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:40, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Södra Hammarbyhamnen May 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 04:26, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Konvojgatan May 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 19:26, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Textilgatan May 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 10:10, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Södra Hammarbyhamnen May 2015 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:23, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Upplands motor May 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:23, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Södra Hammarbyhamnen May 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 10:10, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fryshuset May 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 18:18, 14 May 2015 (UTC) Comment Nice ambience and clouds! -- Slaunger 19:21, 14 May 2015 (UTC) Thank you!--ArildV 09:04, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Husby kyrka May 2015 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 12:46, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Husby kyrka May 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 13:34, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kvarteret Toppsockret May 2015 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:41, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Intrånget May 2015 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--663highland 10:48, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Intrånget May 2015 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:41, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Husby kyrka May 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 07:07, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Södra Hammarbyhamnen May 2015 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment IMO the building is tilted CCW.--XRay 04:51, 16 May 2015 (UTC) Thank you for reviews. I will upload new versions tomorrow.--ArildV 06:28, 16 May 2015 (UTC)✓ Done Thank you--ArildV 13:14, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Support IMO good for QI now.--XRay 06:09, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Textilgatan May 2015 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment IMO the building is leaning in. The small part of the car at the right is disturbing too.--XRay 04:51, 16 May 2015 (UTC) Thank you. I removed the car but I dont think the image will benefit from more perspective correction, it's already heavy correction.--ArildV 13:14, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Support IMO good for QI now.--XRay 06:09, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klensmedjan Horndal May 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 13:11, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hedemora rådhus May 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:47, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Garpenberg herrgård May 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 08:08, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Teaterladan May 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:46, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wahlmanska huset May 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 07:21, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lanchestersmedjan Horndal May 2015 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 07:22, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Garpenberg herrgård May 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 07:22, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Finnhyttans kalkbrott May 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 07:22, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wahlmanska huset May 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 07:22, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Finnhyttans kalkbrott May 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:27, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rällingsbergs gruvor May 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 13:24, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hedemora rådhus May 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Σπάρτακος 10:34, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Slussen Stan May 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:10, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Wow!! But there's banding in the sky, do you think you can fix that before promoting? --Kadellar 14:54, 25 May 2015 (UTC) Thank you Kadellar, the colour banding is fixed by user User:MagentaGreen (who have done a amazing work with the image!).--ArildV 18:55, 25 May 2015 (UTC)]][reply]
Very good work, indeed; thanks! --Kadellar 21:45, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Intrånget May 2015 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 10:34, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Garpenbergs gruvkapell May 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 05:39, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Näs bruk May 2015 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:37, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stureskolan May 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 07:00, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Husby kungsgård May 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 05:41, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kvarteret Toppsockret May 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Horndals bruk May 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 09:36, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brattfors May 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 06:08, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rällingsbergs gruvor May 2015 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:47, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brattfors May 2015 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 06:08, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Original Barnstar
i love contact wikipedia Hayfa hayfouta (talk) 18:08, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bos-Kalles gård May 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 08:12, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hedemora rådhus May 2015 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 07:06, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Intrånget May 2015 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 07:06, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brattfors May 2015 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 08:26, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Långshyttan station May 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Overall good quality, yet tilted ccw. --Cccefalon 10:39, 25 May 2015 (UTC) Thank you. New version uploaded (tilt and perspective correction).--ArildV 14:07, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Good quality. --Cccefalon 08:38, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Näs bruk May 2015 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:41, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sveaparken May 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 07:47, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Garpenberg skola May 2015 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Overall good quality but the left side is leaning out. --Cccefalon 06:59, 29 May 2015 (UTC)✓ Done Thank you, I also removed some foreground.--ArildV 07:25, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Good quality. --Cccefalon 20:57, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Horndals bruk May 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 07:00, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Finnhyttans kalkbrott May 2015 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality (maybe a bit too yellow). --C messier 07:18, 28 May 2015 (UTC)✓ Done Thank you. New version uploaded.--ArildV 07:28, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Klensmedjan Horndal May 2015.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Klensmedjan Horndal May 2015.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rällingsbergs gruvor May 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 12:03, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Långshyttan station May 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 11:57, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nygården May 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 12:07, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stureskolan May 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 07:17, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brattfors May 2015 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:22, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Garpenberg skola May 2015 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:00, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Horndals bruk May 2015 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 07:17, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hedemora gammelgård May 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments ✓ Done Thank you.--ArildV 07:34, 31 May 2015 (UTC) Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:21, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Näs bruk May 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Slightly leaning out but still ok --Poco a poco 08:14, 30 May 2015 (UTC)✓ Done --ArildV 18:09, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hedemora gammelgård May 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:31, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Garpenberg herrgård May 2015 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good overall quality but maybe you can reduce the CA in the branches on the right a little more? --Code 16:02, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Garpenberg skola May 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 06:08, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Långshyttan May 2015 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:41, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Näs bruk May 2015 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 06:08, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Intrånget May 2015 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Some flaws, but enough done right --Daniel Case 18:40, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Slussen Stan May 2015.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Slussen Stan May 2015.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Långshyttan May 2015 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 10:20, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Långshyttan May 2015 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 09:51, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Näs bruk May 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support OK for QI. --C messier 09:38, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Teaterladan May 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:47, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Intrånget May 2015 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:35, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rosendals slott June 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 14:33, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Garpenberg skola May 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 05:56, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Långshyttan May 2015 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 05:56, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your promotion...[edit]

even when you deleted two others. See here. Can you fix it please? --Hubertl (talk) 20:34, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed Halickis promotion of my image. Please be careful. --Hubertl (talk) 23:21, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I am careful of course Hubertl! But strange editing conflicts occur very occasionally. Next time; please consider to fix it by yourself right away to avoid other users to review the same image. Its a wiki, and its even faster when writing a message here. Your call to be careful is absolutely unnecessary.--ArildV (talk) 08:35, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, I'm very sorry that I have made you aware of an error by you. I didn´t know, that swedish Wikimedians are generally not criticisable.--Hubertl (talk) 15:36, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I dont understand your response.--ArildV (talk) 15:41, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bispbergs herrgård May 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 13:02, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rällingsbergs gruvor May 2015 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support U r an excellent photographer. Gorgeous.--Johann Jaritz 13:52, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prince van Orangiën June 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very special.--Johann Jaritz 14:04, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hästskopalatset June 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:31, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hedemora mejeri May 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ezarate 22:00, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gröna Lund June 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:34, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rådhuset metro station June 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 10:44, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hedemora mejeri May 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 10:35, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bridge W242 May 2015 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 22:43, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Näs bruk May 2015 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 22:43, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lumafabriken June 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 09:26, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Turbo kraftverk May 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 08:33, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bispbergs herrgård May 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 08:33, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Textilgatan May 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice lighting but please fix CA at far left. --King of Hearts 05:54, 3 June 2015 (UTC) Thank you. I tried to correct it, new version uploaded.--ArildV 09:11, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Good quality. --King of Hearts 19:21, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Perssonska gården May 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --DKrieger 22:27, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hedemora May 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 19:10, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Turbo kraftverk May 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 08:50, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hedemora May 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:49, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bridge W242 May 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 08:46, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
is leaning ccw--Livioandronico2013 08:49, 7 June 2015 (UTC)✓ Done Thank you.--ArildV 10:15, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Ok now --Livioandronico2013 16:21, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bos-Kalles gård May 2015 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 16:29, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hedemora stadsbibliotek May 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 16:29, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Långgatan Hedemora May 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 16:27, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Södra Hammarbyhamnen June 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality a few dark but accettable --Livioandronico2013 12:03, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nya Carnegiebryggeriet June 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 16:27, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Intrånget May 2015 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 11:34, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bridge W242 May 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good quality -- George Chernilevsky 19:49, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Långshyttan May 2015 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 09:14, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bos-Kalles gård May 2015 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:13, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nya Carnegiebryggeriet June 2015 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 09:21, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wikimedia Sverige-picknick June 2015 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me --Rolf H. 13:45, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Husby kungsgård May 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 14:42, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Gröna Lund June 2015.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Gröna Lund June 2015.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Djurgårdsfärjan June 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Good work! --Hubertl 16:31, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Slussen May 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 09:23, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hedemora May 2015 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 09:23, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Näs bruk May 2015 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 09:23, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sjöstadsparterren June 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me --Rolf H. 07:58, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hedemora Verkstäder May 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 17:28, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Garpenbergs gruvkapell May 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Technically decent; a bit unconventional angle which shows the stance of the building on the cliff nicely. Is that a piece of dust in the sky to the right of the cross? Dllu 07:28, 12 June 2015 (UTC) Thank you, I removed it and uploaded a new version.--ArildV 07:41, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Älvsjö station May 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 10:13, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norra Hammarbyhamnen May 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 10:13, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brattfors May 2015 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok for me, because of the dynamics. --Hubertl 05:44, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Intrånget May 2015 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 12:43, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lanchestersmedjan Horndal May 2015 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 12:43, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Carls stoll May 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 12:43, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Väster-Rotsjön June 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 07:13, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torkilstöten June 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. A little dark, but then again it is a little dark after 11 pm in the evening :-) --Slaunger 22:13, 19 June 2015 (UTC) Thank you for review, I uploaded a new version (+ 0,3 EV).--ArildV 22:28, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stortjärnen June 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 06:34, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Globen September 2014 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Globen September 2014 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of coffee for you![edit]

Det var många fina bilder du tagit. Tack för att du delar med dig. DavidIvar (talk) 02:13, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Tack!--ArildV (talk) 08:26, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kesusjön June 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 10:18, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kesusjön June 2015 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 10:18, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Adelsö September 2014 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:03, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Garnisonen September 2014 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 06:42, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Färentuna kyrka September 2014 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:03, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kesusjön June 2015 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --DXR 08:19, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kesusjön June 2015 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:21, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stockholms stadshus September 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 12:01, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tynningö July 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 10:03, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sandhamn July 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:52, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sandhamn July 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:32, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wind Surf July 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:52, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dalarö July 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:40, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Finnhamn July 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:52, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skarpö July 2015 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 11:21, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saxarfjärden July 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:06, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wind Surf July 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:05, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oscar Falkman July 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI -- Spurzem 14:25, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vaxholms fästning July 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 12:49, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Familjebostäder July 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 14:46, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Örsö July 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 15:14, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stora Ekholmen July 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 13:12, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saxarfjärden July 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:50, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Finnhamn July 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 09:09, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nya Carnegiebryggeriet July 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:44, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stora Saxaren July 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Crisco 1492 14:16, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stora Saxaren July 2015 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:28, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Siaröfortet July 2015 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Amazing. Stunning quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:21, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Siaröfortet July 2015 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I bow to A. V.. --Johann Jaritz 08:24, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mein Schiff 4 July 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:22, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Insjön August 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:44, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tekniska nämndhuset July 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 07:43, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Arild, could you please remove the lens flares? Thank you! --Code (talk) 18:23, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • I did what I could. I removed the magenta lens flares but unfortunately I failed removing the green ones. Too complicated for my Photoshop skills. However, I did a slight perspective correction, too. I hope you like this version, if not, feel free to revert my changes. QI anyways IMO. --Code (talk) 16:03, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your try and the new version you uploaded. Regards --ArildV (talk) 21:00, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lilla Essingen July 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:54, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lundbergska huset August 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 16:44, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brännkyrkagatan August 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:25, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Siaröfortet July 2015 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:19, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Siaröfortet July 2015 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 02:07, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brännkyrkagatan August 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:48, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Biblioteca Vasconcelos, Ciudad de México, México, 2015-07-20, DD 16-18 HDR.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Biblioteca Vasconcelos, Ciudad de México, México, 2015-07-20, DD 16-18 HDR.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Färila kyrka December 2014 03.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Färila kyrka December 2014 03.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Huvudskär fyr August 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:30, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stockholm August 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Very beautiful. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 14:14, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Huvudskär fyr August 2015 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:36, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vaxholm August 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Very good light and compo. I'll support... after correction of the dustspot (please see note).--Jebulon 08:51, 19 August 2015 (UTC) ✓ Done Thank you.--ArildV 09:07, 19 August 2015 (UTC) Support As promised.--Jebulon 17:14, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vaxö August 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Nice mediterranean weather (composition a bit too centered though IMO, but fine enough).--Jebulon 08:55, 19 August 2015 (UTC) ✓ Done Thank you, I uploaded a different (less centered) crop.--ArildV 09:07, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lundbergska huset August 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality; the sky could be a little bit brighter. --Cccefalon 06:18, 20 August 2015 (UTC) I agree, new version uploaded. Thank you.--ArildV 07:08, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Huvudskär fyr August 2015 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments ✓ DoneThank you.--ArildV 05:51, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Good quality and a beautiful place. --Tsungam 06:53, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Storträsk August 2015 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 13:49, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Balder August 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good qualiy. --Tsungam 13:30, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Huvudskär August 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good qualiy. --Tsungam 13:30, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Missionshus Sandhamn August 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:57, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Svartsö August 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:59, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Huvudskär August 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:47, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Svartsö August 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:38, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Huvudskär August 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 08:20, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Storträsk August 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:02, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Masthamnen February 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:15, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Svartsö August 2015 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Please check your image. There is a dust spot top left.--XRay 07:01, 23 August 2015 (UTC)✓ Done thank you, sorry for the late response--ArildV 06:37, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Support No problem. It's OK now.--XRay 16:39, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lilla Essingen July 2015 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:37, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Siaröfortet July 2015 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Σπάρτακος 13:06, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sandhamn August 2015 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Gorgeous composition. Very good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:37, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Missionshus Sandhamn August 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:37, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Stockholm August 2015 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Stockholm August 2015 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:20, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sköt-Rökan August 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:48, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sköt-Rökan August 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:48, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sandhamn August 2015 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:38, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sandhamn August 2015 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 13:52, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Huvudskär fyr August 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:18, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sandhamn August 2015 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good, but please, fix the note. --Poco a poco 07:18, 30 August 2015 (UTC)✓ Done Thank you.--ArildV 07:30, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sandhamns kapell August 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good. --XRay 18:34, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sandhamns kapell August 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment IMO the small white part at the left should be cloned out.--XRay 18:17, 1 September 2015 (UTC)✓ Done Thank you (it was a part of the pilot tower).--ArildV 18:25, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Support OK now. --XRay 18:34, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Siljan August 2015 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Beautiful. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 12:11, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Botvids kyrka February 2015 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:34, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sandhamns tullhus August 2015 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 07:51, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sandhamns kapell August 2015 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 09:27, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sandhamns kapell August 2015 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 19:27, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Siljan August 2015 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 19:27, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Storskär August 2015 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments very useful --Hubertl 06:48, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sandhamns tullhus August 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:59, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Siljan August 2015 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Wow! Could be a FP candidate --Uoaei1 05:39, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Siljan August 2015 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 20:01, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Storskär August 2015 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, maybe a bit too bright but a fine picture --Isiwal 20:43, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vemdalens kyrka September 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:29, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Birka fornborg September 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Breathtaking good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:19, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Storskär August 2015 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 16:23, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Storskär August 2015 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 16:23, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vemdalens kyrka September 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality though I would like it a bit brighter -- Spurzem 07:12, 5 September 2015 (UTC)✓ DoneThank you.--ArildV 07:48, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:HUN-2015-Budapest-Hungarian Parliament (Budapest) 2015-02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:HUN-2015-Budapest-Hungarian Parliament (Budapest) 2015-02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nyköping February 2015 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --C T Johansson 15:25, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nyköping February 2015 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:22, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Siljan August 2015 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice motif but have a look at the cyan and reddish fringes. --Cccefalon 09:10, 6 September 2015 (UTC)✓ Done Thank you for review and note.--ArildV 09:20, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Support well done --Cccefalon 09:44, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Siljan August 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:49, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norrskär August 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 17:28, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rindö redutt August 2015 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 17:11, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Silja August 2015 03.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Silja August 2015 03.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rindö redutt August 2015 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Hockei 17:11, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Botvids kyrka February 2015 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok for me. --Hubertl 15:04, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rindö Redutt August 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 17:08, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Masthuggskyrkan March 2015 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:44, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mariaberget September 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:12, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riddarhuset September 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support A bit blurry at the left but I think it's acceptable. --Code 08:15, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maria Magdalena kyrka September 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:20, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Centralpalatset September 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Overall good quality. Yet tilted ccw. --Cccefalon 07:37, 12 September 2015 (UTC) ✓ Done Thank you.--ArildV 07:45, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Good quality. --Cccefalon 08:04, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Adolf Fredriks kyrka September 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:15, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dalarö kyrka August 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Fine! --Palauenc05 09:11, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Adolf Fredriks kyrka September 2015 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Even when the artificial amateur lightening of the relief in front is disturbing. But it is as it is. --Hubertl 07:21, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Clarion Hotel Post 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:42, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sofia kyrka February 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Potentially FPC. --Hubertl 12:26, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sofia kyrka February 2015 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:57, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Börshuset 2015 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:54, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sofia kyrka February 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good! --Pudelek 08:00, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hornsgatan September 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:08, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Botvids kyrka February 2015 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:45, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Södra teatern September 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 11:39, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rindö redutt August 2015 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Could be sharper, but otherwise well done --Daniel Case 19:38, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rindö redutt August 2015 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice light and detail --Daniel Case 19:38, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Masthuggskyrkan March 2015 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment IMHO, it needs to be brightened a bit. --C messier 15:05, 14 September 2015 (UTC) ✓ Done I agree, mutch better now imo. Thank you.--ArildV 08:30, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Support QI for me. --C messier 19:46, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vaxholms kastell August 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:53, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Storskär August 2015 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:09, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Högalidskyrkan September 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:26, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

QI of Sweden[edit]

Tja! Vad tycks om min uppstramning av Category:Quality images of Sweden? Funkar den? Vivo (talk) 20:47, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ser bra ut, tack för insatsen!--ArildV (talk) 06:37, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Så bra. Jag tyckte det var bäst att fråga nån, så det inte blir konstigt i framtiden. :) Vivo (talk) 11:32, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kungsholms kyrka September 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:35, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stockholms centralstation September 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:40, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Börshuset 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 08:09, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Allehandaborgen May 2014.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Allehandaborgen May 2014.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dorthe Nors Göteborg Book Fair 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:22, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Áslaug Jónsdóttir Göteborg Book Fair 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 07:49, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ágnes Heller.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Áslaug Jónsdóttir.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Paula Hawkins.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ingo September 2015 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:56, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tyska kyrka September 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:56, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sahlgrenska huset September 2015 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:02, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sahlgrenska huset September 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:02, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ingo September 2015 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and spectacular view. --Uoaei1 05:29, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ostindiska huset September 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:16, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ostindiska huset September 2015 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:03, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Götska tornet September 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:40, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palmhuset September 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Dust spots on the sky at left and at top center. Please, fix it -- George Chernilevsky 16:43, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thank you, the new version is also brighter. --ArildV 08:30, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Support. Nice photo now! -- George Chernilevsky 20:35, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hemmet September 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 07:31, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jaktpaviljongen September 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:27, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Diana September 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:34, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ostindiska huset September 2015 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:33, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ingo September 2015 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:33, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vakttältet September 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 10:25, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jaktpaviljongen September 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:23, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Götska tornet September 2015 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:39, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ingo September 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, cool --Isiwal 14:32, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norra hamngatan 4 September 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 10:09, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Erik September 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. But why 1/1600 exposure time for such a short focus length? Therefore more noise than necessary. --Uoaei1 07:07, 3 October 2015 (UTC) My mistake. I was shooting indoors and forgot to change ISO. I can shoot 1/5 sec handheld with this lens (no need for 1/1600!).--ArildV 07:16, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palmhuset September 2015 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:07, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tyska kyrka September 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:53, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kina slott September 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:21, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Göteborgs saluhall September 2015 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:21, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Götska tornet September 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:34, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Masthuggskyrkan September 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:34, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kantor 1 September 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:39, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jaktpaviljongen September 2015 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:39, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Storskär August 2015 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:39, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nya Älvsborg September 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:39, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ingo September 2015 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:39, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Börshuset 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:50, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kvarteret Fänriken September 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Bold perspective. Nice!--Famberhorst 15:23, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palmhuset September 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:50, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stockholms slott August 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 10:55, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palmhuset September 2015 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Artillerigården September 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 15:03, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:30, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:41, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:25, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:22, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

--QICbot ([[User talk:QICbot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:34, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]