User talk:Clwacker

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Clwacker!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 19:20, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

usage des catégories

[edit]

Bonjour. Merci pour ces nombreuses photographies des bornes-frontières et leur catégorisations dans Commons. Cependant il est d'usage de ne pas cumuler, par exemple l'image File:Borne frontière France-Suisse (Doubs-Neuchâtel) no.142 - 02.jpg portait Category:France-Switzerland boundary stones. Vous lui ajoutez Category:France-Switzerland (Doubs-Neuchâtel) boundary stone no.142, alors qu'il faudrait remplacer l'une par l'autre car la première est contenue dans la seconde. On ne fait pas de "double catégorisation". Exemple simpliste : si une image est catégorisée "Neuchâtel", on ne lui ajoute pas la catégorie "Switzerland". --MHM (talk) 08:44, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dans vos "Préférences", onglet "Gadgets" (lien Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-gadgets), vous pouvez activer l'option "Outils pour les catégories" : "Cat-a-lot : outil qui aide à transférer les images d'une catégorie à une autre. Je viens de l'utiliser pour rapidement retirer les catégories inutiles, par lots. --MHM (talk) 08:51, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Et c'est pareil pour les catégories Category:Boundary stones in the canton of Neuchâtel et Category:Boundary stones in Doubs qu'il est inutile de répéter dans les fichiers, car elles se trouvent associées aux catégories par borne. --MHM (talk) 08:55, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Merci beaucoup pour l'information et pour l'action. Je fais le nécessaire dès à présent pour les photos que je suis en train d'introduire. Et j'essayerai de modifier par lot si je trouve comment le faire pour celles qui sont encore avec double catégorisation. PS. j'espère répondre au bon endroit. Clwacker (talk) 09:10, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

oui, merci, cette page est maintenant dans ma liste de suivi.
je viens de modifier des milliers de double-catégorisation, et d'ajouter de nouvelles catégories pour que cela soit plus facile de s'y retrouver.
Concernant les Category:Hautes bornes du franc-alleu, les n°1 et 5 sont des désormais catégories redirigées sur d'autres, on ne peut pas donner deux noms différents pour un même objet
Pour maîtriser Cat-a-lot : voir la page d'aide, lien en bout de ligne sur la page des options
Suggestion : compléter les localisations (coordonnées géographiques) des catégories des bornes :-)
Bonne suite --MHM (talk) 10:32, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Merci mille fois pour ce beau travail! Si vous n'êtes pas trop loin de Neuchâtel, je vous inviterai pour un verre. La localisation des catégories, bonne idée. J'ai vu qu'au moins une catégorie (Category:Boundary stone BE004) est déjà géolocalisée. Un bot a-t-il fait ce travail automatiquement? Comme c'est le cas pour les photos? Clwacker (talk) 13:29, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

We need your feedback!

[edit]

Hello. Apologies if this message is not in your native language: please feel free to respond in the language of your choice. Thank you!

I am writing to you because we are looking for feedback for a new Wikimedia Foundation project, Structured Data Across Wikimedia (SDAW). SDAW is a grant-funded programme that will explore ways to structure content on wikitext pages in a way that will be machine-recognizable and -relatable, in order to make reading, editing, and searching easier and more accessible across projects and on the Internet. We are now focusing on designing and building image suggestion features for experienced users.

We have some questions to ask you about your experience with uploading images here on Wikimedia Commons and then adding them to Wikipedia. You can answer these questions on a specific feedback page on Mediawiki, where we will gather feedback. As I said, these questions are in English, but your answers do not need to be in English! You can also answer in your own language, if you feel more comfortable.

Once the collecting of feedback will be over, we will sum it up and share with you a summary, along with updated mocks that will incorporate your inputs.

Also, if you want to keep in touch with us or you want to know more about the project, you can subscribe to our newsletter.

Hope to hear from you soon! -- Sannita (WMF) (talk to me!) 09:57, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Palosirkka (talk) 13:17, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I have a few other empty Categories which can also be deleted:
COMB-CRES.01
COMB-LELA.01
COMB.01
CORN-CRES.01.RC
Borne.LEPL-LCDF.a
Bois de l'Abbé 18
Bois de l'Abbé 17
Bois de l'Abbé 16
Bois de l'Abbé 15
Bois de l'Abbé 14
Bois de l'Abbé 13
Bois du Peux 19
Bois du Peux 20
Bois du Peux 21
Bois du Peux 22
Bois du Peux 23
Bois du Peux 24
Bois du Peux 26
Bois du Peux 27
Bois du Peux 28
Bois du Peux 30
Bois du Peux 32
Bois du Peux 33
Bois du Peux 34
Bois du Peux 35
Bois du Peux 36
Bois du Peux 37
Bois du Peux 38 37
Bois du Peux 39
Bois du Peux 41
Bois du Peux 42
Sous le chemin au Prêtre 39
Chaumont (Neuchâtel) boundary stones Clwacker (talk) 18:36, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Palosirkka (talk) 13:17, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Palosirkka (talk) 13:17, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Palosirkka (talk) 13:17, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Palosirkka (talk) 13:17, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Palosirkka (talk) 08:55, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Palosirkka (talk) 08:55, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Palosirkka (talk) 08:55, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Palosirkka (talk) 08:55, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Palosirkka (talk) 08:55, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Palosirkka (talk) 08:55, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Palosirkka (talk) 08:55, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Palosirkka (talk) 08:55, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Palosirkka (talk) 08:55, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Palosirkka (talk) 08:55, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Palosirkka (talk) 08:55, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Palosirkka (talk) 08:55, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Palosirkka (talk) 08:55, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Palosirkka (talk) 08:55, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Palosirkka (talk) 08:55, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Palosirkka (talk) 08:55, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Palosirkka (talk) 08:55, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Palosirkka (talk) 08:55, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Palosirkka (talk) 08:55, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Palosirkka (talk) 08:55, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Palosirkka (talk) 08:55, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Palosirkka (talk) 08:55, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Palosirkka (talk) 08:55, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Palosirkka (talk) 08:55, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Palosirkka (talk) 08:55, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Palosirkka (talk) 08:55, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Palosirkka (talk) 08:59, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Palosirkka (talk) 08:59, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Palosirkka (talk) 08:59, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Palosirkka (talk) 08:59, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Palosirkka (talk) 08:59, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Palosirkka (talk) 08:59, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Palosirkka (talk) 09:00, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How to ask for speedy-delete of an empty category

[edit]

When you want to ask for speedy-delete of an empty category, best practice is to mark it with {{SD|C2}} if it would be OK to re-create it in the future, given that appropriate content becomes available or {{SD|C1}} if it is an inappropriate category name that should not be reused. In particular, this is better practice than just blanking the category page, as you did at Category:Boundary stone BE001A. ("C1" and "C2" come from Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion). Jmabel ! talk 19:46, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Jmabel for the explanation. Clwacker (talk) 15:56, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]