User talk:Halavar/Archive11

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Jurong Bird Park (218).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me. --Basotxerri 16:23, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Jurong Bird Park (237).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me. --Basotxerri 16:50, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Downtown Core, River Hongbao 2016 (18).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 10:58, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Jurong Bird Park (180).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment The DoF is a little shallow, but not too much considering the angle. A tiny bit of noise reduction is recommended.--Peulle 10:57, 27 February 2017 (UTC)  Done New version uploaded. Please take a look again. -Halavar 16:58, 27 February 2017 (UTC) Comment OK.--Peulle 19:13, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Jurong Bird Park (256).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:55, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Jurong Bird Park (238).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:47, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Jurong Bird Park (231).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:56, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Jurong Bird Park (182).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:10, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Gardens by the Bay, Wewnątrz Kwiatowej Kopuły (33).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:00, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Downtown Core, Memoriał Lim Bo Senga (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Was there anything preventing you from shifting to the left and getting a more symmetrical view looking up the steps? Juliancolton 16:27, 22 February 2017 (UTC)  Comment I take that kind of image with number 03. --Halavar 11:41, 28 February 2017 (UTC) Support I'm going to go ahead and vote yes for this one since it's been a while since the first reviewer's note. It's good enough for QI, IMO, even though the obelisk could have been a bit sharper. Please take it to CR if anybody disagrees.--Peulle 13:41, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Little India, Ulica Kerbau, Była rezydencja Tan Teng Niaha (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Peulle 17:59, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Little India, Ulica Kerbau, Domy-sklepy (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The crop isn't ideal, it seems that you're too near to the houses. Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:05, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Little India, Świątynia Sri Veeramakaliamman (19).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 19:10, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Little India, Meczet Abdul Gaffoor (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:10, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Jurong Bird Park (216).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me. --Basotxerri 19:05, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Little India, Ulica Kerbau, Domy-sklepy (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:16, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Little India, Ulica Dunlop, Zdobiona fasada domu-sklepu (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:00, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Little India, Ulica Dunlop, Domy-sklepy (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:26, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Little India, Ulica Serangoon, Domy-sklepy (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 17:52, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Little India, Świątynia Sri Veeramakaliamman (26).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 17:52, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Little India, Ulica Kerbau 672, Budynek.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 21:49, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Jurong Bird Park (254).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments IMO the left bird is too unsharp (look at its head), so the only way to rescue this, seems to me to make a crop without it (see note). --Basotxerri 19:04, 4 March 2017 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the hint. New version uploaded. Please take a look again. --Halavar 15:20, 5 March 2017 (UTC) OK for me. --Basotxerri 17:49, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Rochor, Świątynia Sri Krishnan (21).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 01:58, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Rochor, Człowiek bez nosa przed świątynią (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 02:02, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Little India, Ulica Dunlop, Zdobiona fasada domu-sklepu (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice motif, sharpness is OK. -- Ikan Kekek 02:01, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Widoki miasta widziane z Wieży Taming Sari (33).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carschten 09:25, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, Wiatrak obok Placu Holenderskiego (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:34, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Little India, Świątynia Sri Veeramakaliamman (24).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful motif, but the sharpness on the temple decorations is so-so, even at the size of my laptop screen. Could you sharpen more? -- Ikan Kekek 06:10, 6 March 2017 (UTC) Done New, sharper version uploaded. Please take a look again. --Halavar 11:23, 6 March 2017 (UTC) Thanks. The difference is subtle, but it does look a little sharper. I am promoting it because I think that this level of sharpness in hazy weather is sufficient for this size of file at QIC, especially because the subject is really beautiful. If it goes to CR because others disagree, at that point, I might be neutral and just let others decide. -- Ikan Kekek 11:57, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Little India, Ulica Serangoon, Domy-sklepy (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 10:44, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Rochor, Świątynia Sri Krishnan (33).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:36, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Rochor, Świątynia Sri Krishnan (30).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 13:33, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Rochor, Świątynia Sri Krishnan (27).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 13:41, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Rochor, Świątynia Sri Krishnan (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 13:33, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Rochor, Świątynia Sri Krishnan (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1, but it might have been a bit sharper --Michielverbeek 14:23, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Little India, Ulica Serangoon, Domy-sklepy (09).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Outline against the sky could have done something sharper. Small stain in the air, but good enough for me.--Famberhorst 16:29, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Rochor, Świątynia Sri Krishnan (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 14:47, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Rochor, Świątynia Sri Krishnan (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 13:22, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Rochor, Świątynia Sri Krishnan (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:29, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Rochor, Człowiek bez nosa przed świątynią (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:28, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Little India, Ulica Dunlop, Zdobiona fasada domu-sklepu (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:16, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:2016 Singapur, Rochor, Świątynia Sri Krishnan (21).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2016 Singapur, Rochor, Świątynia Sri Krishnan (21).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Rochor, Świątynia Sri Krishnan (17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 16:11, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Little India, Meczet Abdul Gaffoor (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 14:30, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Little India, Ulica Kerbau, Domy-sklepy (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:30, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Museum Planning Area, Narodowe Muzeum Singapuru (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:16, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Museum Planning Area, Vanguard Building (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. -- Ikan Kekek 12:56, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Little India, Ulica Dunlop, Domy-sklepy (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:06, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
National Museum of Singapore. View from N-E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:45, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:29, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Museum Planning Area, Muzeum Filatelistyczne (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:50, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Museum Planning Area, Sala Wolnomularzy (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 23:48, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Museum Planning Area, Sala Wolnomularzy (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:04, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Museum Planning Area, Narodowe Muzeum Singapuru (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice!--Famberhorst 16:17, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Rochor, Synagoga Maghain Aboth (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 12:15, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Muzeum Ludobójstwa Tuol Sleng (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:05, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Muzeum Ludobójstwa Tuol Sleng (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:05, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Rochor, Świątynia Sri Krishnan (22).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit noisy, especially the background. Do you think you could apply some additional NR without loosing too much detail? --Basotxerri 15:42, 5 April 2017 (UTC)  Done Yes, I think I did it:) Please take a look again. --Halavar 16:54, 5 April 2017 (UTC) Thank you! Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:28, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

WLE 2017 Georgia

Hello Halavar and thanks for your help regarding categories but we need to determine one thing. There are several protected territories with shared name but have different protection category for example Sataplia - we have Category:Sataplia Managed Reserve and Category:Sataplia Strict Nature Reserve I think by definition Strict Nature Reserve is more protected one and it is not allowed there to build something but Managed Reserve is managed for some purposes. Considering this I think we will have a lot of work to put everything on its place.--g. balaxaZe★ 13:44, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

You're right. In the Strict Nature Reserves there should not be any buildings. I didn't know that there is also Category:Sataplia Managed Reserve. There are no informations about that. I thought that there is only one reserve in Sataplia. We can see that on maps and also we see the name of the place here: File:Sataplia Nature Reserve. Entrance (Photo A. Muhranoff, 2011).jpg - just Sataplia Nature Reserve. Not strict, not managed, just Sataplia Nature Reserve. I helped with the photos because I saw strange thing, that all images from Sataplia are in the category of the cave, so I moved them to more proper category. --Halavar (talk) 15:39, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Yes many photos and even categories were saying wrong things, I've made the list in accordance to the www.apa.gov.ge and I am renaming all categories to the correct name.--g. balaxaZe★ 20:04, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Regarding Muhranoff's photo it was taken in 2011, perhaps something has changed after that.--g. balaxaZe★ 20:06, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

I've been there in 2014 and name doesn't change. Also it exist on maps and guidebooks. --Halavar (talk) 20:36, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Wat Langka (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:00, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Wat Langka (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:00, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Muzeum Ludobójstwa Tuol Sleng (20).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:49, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Muzeum Ludobójstwa Tuol Sleng (26).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:49, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Muzeum Ludobójstwa Tuol Sleng (40).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:49, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Muzeum Ludobójstwa Tuol Sleng (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 19:23, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Rochor, Synagoga Maghain Aboth (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nothing really wrong with this one ... why did it take so long to be reviewed? --Daniel Case 18:55, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vanguard Building in Singapore. View from North.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope, all criteria met. --kaʁstn Dis/Cat 13:44, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:38, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Canard colvert - Lac du Bourget.jpg

Hello. Could you further clarify the exact reasons for a vote against strong please? Indeed, I don't see how this alters the quality of the image. A big thanks in advance, Mathis73 (talk) 22:25, 13 April 2017 (UTC).

As I said, posterization and JPG artifacts. There is a strong loss of details. When you see a full scale image, look closely how your image looks like. Quality image can't look like this. Look to other images in this category: Category:Quality images of Anas platyrhynchos --Halavar (talk) 22:40, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Certainly, in any case, thank you for your answer, even if I remain sceptical (I will study this in more detail). Mathis73 (talk) 22:47, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Wat Langka (22).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:42, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Muzeum Ludobójstwa Tuol Sleng (42).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Maybe not everyone's taste but OK for me. --Basotxerri 14:58, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Wat Langka (09).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carschten 10:19, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Wat Langka (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:00, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Wat Langka (17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:06, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Wat Langka (27).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 11:22, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Wat Langka (25).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 11:21, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Wat Langka (54).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 11:45, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Wat Langka (35).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 11:29, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Muzeum Ludobójstwa Tuol Sleng (17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:50, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Main temple in Wat Langka. Phnom Penh, Cambodia. Entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:34, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ivanhercaz (talk) 14:03, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Wat Langka (46).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Focus to main object gooed enough for a Q1photo --Michielverbeek 12:47, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Wat Langka (36).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:50, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Wat Langka (23).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 09:20, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Kambodżański tuk-tuk (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:09, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Wat Botum (25).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good photo of the statue. -- Ikan Kekek 10:21, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Wat Botum (18).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:09, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Wat Botum (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Shame about the twig left to the head, but for me good quality.--Famberhorst 16:24, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Wat Botum (23).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:21, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Wat Botum (22).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 11:39, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Wat Botum (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:21, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Wat Langka (51).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:16, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

File:Castle of Colombier 11.jpg

Witaj, niestety nie potrafię lepiej poprawić tego zdjęcia. Dopiero zaczynam przygodę z Lightroomem. Dałbyś radę go poprawić, gdybym przesłał Ci plik w RAW? Tournasol7 (talk) 17:30, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Myślę, że to obiektyw się nie spisał. Trudno, wycofam zdjęcie. Inne fotografie tego zamku wyszły lepiej, więc nie ma tragedii :) Tournasol7 (talk) 19:24, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

CA można jakoś usunąć? Tournasol7 (talk) 21:32, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

To podaj adres e-mail :) Tournasol7 (talk) 22:30, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Budynek sądu (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 11:44, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Rzeka w centrum miasta.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:16, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Wat Langka (29).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:31, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Promenada przy rzece w centrum miasta.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice composition. Could you put more precise categories for this, if possible? Perhaps the bench is worth some, too. --Basotxerri 17:23, 18 April 2017 (UTC)  Done Hope it's better now. --Halavar 18:17, 18 April 2017 (UTC) Hi Halavar, I haven't explained it well, sorry, I thought more about the category Phnom Penh because this must be a some special place in the town. However, if you say that you can't put this better, it's OK, too. Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:54, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Budynek sądu (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:47, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Chinatown, Ulica Telok Ayer, Thian Hock Keng (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 16:03, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Wat Langka (42).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 10:32, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Tradycyjny Kambodżański Pokaz Tańca (050).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It is a bit grainy, but the quality is accepable under such difficult light conditions, IMO. Good quality. --W.carter 12:14, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Tradycyjny Kambodżański Pokaz Tańca (057).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It is a bit grainy, but the quality is accepable under such difficult light conditions, IMO. Good quality --W.carter 12:14, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Wat Botum (09).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 20:27, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kuala Lumpur, Dataran Merdeka, Wycieczka pozująca do zdjęcia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, focus in the right place. I've added 'Category:Group photographs of standing people', please remember such cats in the future. --W.carter 18:53, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Malakka, A Famosa (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:20, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Tradycyjny Kambodżański Pokaz Tańca (137).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --A.Savin 11:56, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kutaisi, Dzień Niepodległości Gruzji (43).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:14, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Wat Botum (17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A little on the dark side. Do you think you could brighten it a bit? --W.carter 08:57, 22 April 2017 (UTC)  Done Yes, I uploaded new, fixed version. Please take a look again. --Halavar 10:42, 26 April 2017 (UTC) That's better. :) Good quality. --W.carter 13:52, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Wat Phnom (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:30, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Wat Phnom (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 11:26, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Centralny Urząd Pocztowy (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:30, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Bordżomi, Diabelski młyn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 19:33, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Mccheta, Plac z fontanną (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:37, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

File:Berlin Tierpark Friedrichsfelde 12-2015 Schloss img1.jpg

Concerning this picture, please mind that I cannot make BOTH the edges and the windows perfectly vertical. The valid reference for me are the edges. I don't think it's fair to expect me to correct the verticals any further: extremely mirror issues, if ever. Please reconsider --A.Savin 11:05, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Thanks. --A.Savin 15:15, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Wat Phnom (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 13:26, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pomnik króla Sisowatha poświęcony traktatowi z 1907 roku (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 10:27, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Muzeum Narodowe Kambodży (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:53, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Muzeum Narodowe Kambodży (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 10:19, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Main temple in Wat Phnom. Phnom Penh, Cambodia. View from N-E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:57, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

•  Comment IMO, need a little bit of perspective correction. ~ Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 18:18, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Wschodnia część muru (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:34, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Biuro UNESCO (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:37, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Park Królewski, Ołtarz dla króla Kambodży Norodoma Sihamoni (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 10:40, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Muzeum Narodowe Kambodży (09).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:34, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pomnik króla Sisowatha poświęcony traktatowi z 1907 roku (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 10:09, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Lightroom

Mam pytanie; czy u Ciebie też Lightroom tak strasznie wolno działa? Tournasol7 (talk) 17:29, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Biuro UNESCO (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 15:37, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Park Królewski, Ołtarz dla króla Kambodży Norodoma Sihamoni (08).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:24, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Muzeum Narodowe Kambodży (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Top right is skewed, but that is probably so. For me good quality, but could have done something sharper,--Famberhorst 15:27, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pomnik króla Sisowatha poświęcony traktatowi z 1907 roku (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:23, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Brama w północnej stronie muru.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 10:21, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Posąg przy budce z biletami (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 15:03, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Brama we wschodniej części muru (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:19, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Ogrody królewskie i Pawilon Chanchhaya (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:19, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Preah Tineang Phhochani (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It's not much but it seems slightly tilted CCW. --Basotxerri 15:14, 2 May 2017 (UTC)  Done New version uploaded. Please take a look again --Halavar 15:23, 2 May 2017 (UTC) OK now! Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:57, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Hor Samritvimean (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:19, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Wat Phnom (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:56, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Preah Tineang Phhochani (08).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 11:27, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Ogrody królewskie i Pawilon Chanchhaya (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 11:00, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Posąg przy budce z biletami (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I presume that the statue was tilted that way... Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:54, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Preah Tineang Phhochani (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 12:38, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Ogrody królewskie i Pawilon Chanchhaya (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 12:42, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Wschodnia część muru (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Could be sharper on the background but OK for me. --Basotxerri 15:13, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Plac w centrum miasta pomiędzy Muzeum Narodowym a Pałacem Królewskim.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 15:37, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Wat Phnom (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good use of DoF. Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:14, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Brama we wschodniej części muru (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 10:57, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Wat Langka (44).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Looks a bit tilted CCW.--Peulle 10:33, 27 April 2017 (UTC)  Done New, fixed version uploaded. Please take a look again. --Halavar 10:43, 27 April 2017 (UTC)OK now.--Peulle 19:11, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Park Królewski, Kaplica Preah Ang Dorngkeu (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:55, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Hor Samritvimean (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 04:32, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Preah Tineang Phhochani (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:04, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Preah Tineang Phhochani (20).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 10:32, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Preah Tineang Phhochani (17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There is a slight dust spot on the left of the cloud, could you remove it, please? --Basotxerri 13:54, 8 May 2017 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the hint. New fixed version uploaded. Please take a look again. --Halavar 15:32, 8 May 2017 (UTC) OK for me now, thank you! Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:56, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Hor Samritvimean (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:42, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Hor Samritvimean (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 17:26, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Muzeum Narodowe Kambodży (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:42, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Stupa Króla Suramarith i Królowej Kossomak (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 17:30, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Srebrna Pagoda (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Fine. --Palauenc05 16:06, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Mandapa Satry i Tripitaki (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 19:21, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Dzwonnica (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 16:23, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Preah Tineang Phhochani (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Good composition. --Peulle 17:27, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Centralny Urząd Pocztowy (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 18:23, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
UNESCO office in Phnom Penh. View from West.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 23:00, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Srebrna Pagoda (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:00, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Srebrna Pagoda (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 10:20, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Dzwonnica (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please correct the dust spot (see note) --Uoaei1 10:21, 11 May 2017 (UTC)  Done Thanks! New, fixed version uploaded. Please take a look again. --Halavar 21:35, 11 May 2017 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:03, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Mandapa Satry i Tripitaki (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:03, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Hor Samritvimean (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:48, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Preah Tineang Phhochani (18).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:46, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Preah Tineang Phhochani (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 13:38, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Stupa Króla Suramarith i Królowej Kossomak (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for me --Jakubhal 17:07, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Hor Samritvimean (08).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good focus and soothing coloring. PumpkinSky 12:04, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Muzeum Narodowe Kambodży (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 13:41, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Hor Samritvimean (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:02, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Hala Tronowa (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:02, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Categories

Cześć, widziałem Twój komentarz odnośnie dodawanie kategorii. Staram się je dodawać, ale czynię to kiedy dane zdjęcie uzyska status QI. Dzięki temu w kategoriach jak np. "April 2017 in France" są tylko najlepsze zdjęcia. Ze względu na dużą pojemność tych kategorii myślę, że to jest dobre rozwiązanie. Pozdrawiam, Tournasol7 (talk) 12:39, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Ok, postaram się pamiętać o dodawaniu tych kategorii. Możesz mi przypomnieć patent na przyspieszenie pracy komputera przy Lightroomie, bo gdzie mi to uciekło... PS: dzięki za pozytywne słowa. Staram się lepiej obrabiać, choć wiem, że cały czas muszę się uczyć. Tournasol7 (talk) 17:17, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Ok, thanks :) Tournasol7 (talk) 19:13, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Preah Tineang Phhochani (14).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Preah Tineang Phhochani (14).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Srebrna Pagoda (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perhaps cutting the lamppost on the right better, but good enough for me.--Famberhorst 16:16, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Dhammasala (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Manfred Kuzel 15:11, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Stupa Króla Suramarith i Królowej Kossomak (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:37, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Budynek sądu (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:37, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Srebrna Pagoda (09).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 20:25, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Mandapa Satry i Tripitaki (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 20:25, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Preah Tineang Phhochani (16).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 18:13, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Hor Samritvimean (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:30, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Brama wyjściowa z galerią (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:38, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Brama wyjściowa z galerią (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:38, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Stupa Kanthy Bophy (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Also a good one. -- Ikan Kekek 12:01, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Stupa Kanthy Bophy (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful and very sharp. -- Ikan Kekek 11:58, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Srebrna Pagoda (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 11:15, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Pomnik króla Norodoma i dwie stupy (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 18:44, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Stupa Króla Ang Duonga (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 18:44, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Brama wyjściowa z galerią (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:16, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Stupa Kanthy Bophy i Phnom Mondop (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:41, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Stupa Kanthy Bophy i Phnom Mondop (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Dust spot at the top --A.Savin 08:37, 16 May 2017 (UTC)  Done Thanks, I didn't see it. New fixed version uploaded. --Halavar 10:41, 16 May 2017 (UTC)  Support Good. --A.Savin 13:21, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Stupa Króla Suramarith i Królowej Kossomak (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --СССР 13:19, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Stupa Króla Ang Duonga (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 10:19, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Keong Preah Bat (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:03, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Pomnik króla Norodoma (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:03, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Preah Tineang Phhochani (21).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 10:23, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Pomnik króla Norodoma (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I'm not sure but this one seems a bit underexposed. In any case, please remove the dust spot in the sky. --Basotxerri 17:26, 19 May 2017 (UTC)  Done I did both things right now. New fixed version uploaded. --Halavar 17:32, 19 May 2017 (UTC) Thank you! Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:59, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Pomnik króla Norodoma (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 18:32, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Buddyjska mała kapliczka (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Everything there looks the same, doesn't it?  :-) Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:28, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Stupa króla Norodoma (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 18:54, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Dhammasala (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 18:42, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Silver Pagoda in the Royal Palace. Phnom Penh, Cambodia. View from N-W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in rich scope. DeFacto (talk). 19:32, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:23, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Pomnik króla Norodoma i stupa Króla Ang Duonga.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:12, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Pomnik króla Norodoma (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Tournasol7 22:26, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Stupa króla Norodoma (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Tournasol7 22:26, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Muzeum Narodowe Kambodży (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:07, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Pomnik króla Norodoma (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:30, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Wat Botum (24).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 11:31, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Keong Preah Bat (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 20:10, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Stupa Kanthy Bophy i Phnom Mondop (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 20:12, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Pomnik króla Norodoma i buddyjska mała kapliczka.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 20:42, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Brama wyjściowa z galerią (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:06, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Stupa Króla Ang Duonga (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Dood quality--Lmbuga 20:44, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:2016 Phnom Penh, Posągi Decho Measa i Decho Yorta.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Posągi Decho Measa i Decho Yorta.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 19:02, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Pomnik króla Norodoma (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Thanks, GQ now --DXR 20:25, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Keong Preah Bat (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:28, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Stupa króla Norodoma (09).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:55, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Srebrna Pagoda (02).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Srebrna Pagoda (02).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Sihanoukville, Plaża Serendipity (08).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me. --Basotxerri 18:58, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Stupa Króla Ang Duonga (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Maybe a bit more contrast, but good enough for me.--Famberhorst 15:32, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Pomnik króla Norodoma (09).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 14:40, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Phnom Mondop (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 04:50, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Sihanoukville, Plaża Serendipity (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Could you please remove that dust spot - I tried mark it. --PtrQs 11:21, 25 May 2017 (UTC)  Done Thanks! New fixed version uploaded. --Halavar 12:09, 25 May 2017 (UTC)  Support Good Quality - BTW: You could also check your image of the king Norodom statue for the same spot (identical body + similar aperture + same background -> same dust spot) --PtrQs 10:41, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Stupa Króla Ang Duonga (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment There is a dust spot --A.Savin 11:22, 25 May 2017 (UTC)  Done Thanks! New fixed version uploaded. --Halavar 12:09, 25 May 2017 (UTC) OK. --A.Savin 14:31, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kampot, Stare budynki na ulicy nr 726 (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:16, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kampot, Hotel Auberge du Soleil (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:26, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kampot, Narodowy Bank Kambodży - oddział w Kampot (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:16, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kampot, Muzeum Prowincji Kampot (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:10, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kampot, Muzeum Prowincji Kampot (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:01, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Sihanoukville, Plaża Serendipity (09).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The image is tilted CCW (check horizon) and leaning out (check building on the right). Could you fix that, please? --Basotxerri 18:15, 1 June 2017 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the hint. New fixed version uploaded now. --Halavar 19:11, 1 June 2017 (UTC) OK for me. --Basotxerri 15:14, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kampot, Staw lotosów (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:38, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Saint Saturnin Church of Tourbes

Saint Saturnin Church of Tourbes 02

Witaj, pomógłbyś mi z tym zdjęciem? Za nic w świecie nie potrafię w nim dobrze ustawić perspektywy... Tournasol7 (talk) 16:52, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kampot, Stare targowisko.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 08:48, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kampot, Budynek ze sklepami.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 08:48, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kampot, Stare budynki na ulicy Riverside (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 08:48, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kampot, Departament Gospodarki i Finansów prowincji Kampot (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 08:48, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kampot, Narodowy Bank Kambodży - oddział w Kampot (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 08:48, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kampot, Stary most.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support Good quality. Could be better with more DoF. --XRay 05:40, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Prowincja Krabi, Łodzie w przystani Noppharat Thara (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice scene. -- Ikan Kekek 22:27, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kampot, Old Market Street, Domy-sklepy (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Dakline could have been a bit sharper, but good enough for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:40, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Prowincja Krabi, Ko Po Da Nok (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The outline of the mountains against the sky might have been a little sharper, but good for me.--Famberhorst 15:21, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Prowincja Krabi, Ko Phi Phi Don, Plaża Ton Sai (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I enjoy the lively composition and the quality is good enough. -- Ikan Kekek 08:49, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Prowincja Krabi, Ko Phi Phi Don, Plaża Loh Moo Dee, Łódź długoogonowa (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 07:50, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Prowincja Krabi, Ko Phi Phi Don, Plaża Loh Moo Dee, Tajska para ślubna (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice picture! I hope they have a copy of the file. :-) -- Ikan Kekek 08:50, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Prowincja Krabi, Ko Po Da Nok (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Tournasol7 15:04, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Prowincja Krabi, Ko Phi Phi Don, Plaża Ton Sai (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Widzę, że podróżowaliśmy podobnymi ściaęzkami :) Tournasol7 15:04, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Prowincja Krabi, Ko Phi Phi Don, Plaża Loh Moo Dee, Tajska para ślubna (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Maybe VI. --Peulle 14:52, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kampot, Narodowy Bank Kambodży - oddział w Kampot (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Slaunger 20:27, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kampot, Rondo duriana (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There are a number of light dust spots throughout the sky. Otherwise of good quality and fun. -- Ikan Kekek 08:56, 8 June 2017 (UTC)  Done New fixed version uploaded now. --Halavar 15:14, 9 June 2017 (UTC) Thanks. Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 04:44, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kampot, Deptak nad rzeką Praek Tuek Chhu (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 14:19, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Stupa króla Norodoma (08).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit underexposed, isn't it? --Basotxerri 16:41, 2 June 2017 (UTC)  Done New fixed version uploaded. Please take a look again. --Halavar 09:26, 3 June 2017 (UTC) Sorry, Halavar, the brightness is OK but I didn't mention the dust spots on the right of the tower, could you remove them, please. I should have already said this... --Basotxerri 17:55, 5 June 2017 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the hint, I didn't see these dust spots. New fixed version available --Halavar 15:02, 9 June 2017 (UTC) Good quality. --Basotxerri 05:34, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Prowincja Krabi, Plaża Nopparat Thara (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me. --Basotxerri 16:59, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Prowincja Krabi, Łodzie w przystani Noppharat Thara (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 15:05, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Prowincja Krabi, Łodzie w przystani Noppharat Thara (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:22, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Prowincja Krabi, Plaża Nopparat Thara (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 11:13, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Prowincja Krabi, Ko Ngai (16).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:28, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Prowincja Krabi, Ko Ngai (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:22, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Prowincja Krabi, Ko Po Da Nok (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:22, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Brama wyjściowa z galerią (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There's a dust spot in the sky. --Basotxerri 17:46, 12 June 2017 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the hint. New fixed version uploaded. --Halavar 23:41, 14 June 2017 (UTC) OK now! Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:46, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Prowincja Krabi, Ko Ngai (21).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:33, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kampot, Hotel Auberge du Soleil (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Photo is messy, but the picture quality is good for me.--Famberhorst 15:44, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kampot, Zachód słońca nad rzeką Praek Tuek Chhu (20).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, IMO. In this kind of atmospheric photo, a soft focus is not only fine but appropriate. Beautiful photo. -- Ikan Kekek 06:30, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Prowincja Trang, Ko Kradan (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:09, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Prowincja Trang, Ko Kradan (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:09, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Prowincja Krabi, Ko Ngai (17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:56, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Prowincja Trang, Ko Kradan (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 10:53, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kampot, Zachód słońca nad rzeką Praek Tuek Chhu (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:29, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Prowincja Krabi, Ko Ma (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 13:28, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Prowincja Trang, Ko Muk (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 13:28, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Prowincja Krabi, Ko Ngai (20).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:18, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Muzeum Narodowe Kambodży (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 12:19, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Prowincja Krabi, Ko Ngai (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 16:42, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Prowincja Krabi, Łodzie w przystani Noppharat Thara (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK for me. --C messier 17:30, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Prowincja Trang, Ko Kradan (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 15:17, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Prowincja Trang, Ko Kradan (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 11:29, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Prowincja Trang, Ko Kradan (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 11:29, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Prowincja Krabi, Ko Ngai (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Maybe FP? --Martin Falbisoner 11:29, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Prowincja Trang, Ko Kradan (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support. Not quite clear what's the main subject here. The water? Unsharp in the first plane... The island? Rather hazy... The swimmer? quite small... --Basotxerri 19:41, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Prowincja Krabi, Plaża Nopparat Thara (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK. --C messier 12:33, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Prowincja Trang, Ko Muk (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good -- Spurzem 19:09, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Prowincja Trang, Ko Kradan (09).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 19:16, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Prowincja Trang, Ko Kradan (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 20:38, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kampot, Stare budynki na ulicy nr 726 (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 01:50, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kampot, Staw lotosów (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 19:10, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

good eveningHalavar,

Opmerking Vertical lines are not straight (see the note). Image needs perspective correction --Halavar 20:29, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for your comment. I do not see a note. Do you want to add it?--Famberhorst 04:55, 12 July 2017 (UTC
Sincerely,--Famberhorst (talk) 15:59, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Prowincja Krabi, Widoki ze statku płynącego na trasie Ao Nang - Ko Lanta Yai (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and a lot of envy --Livioandronico2013 20:18, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Prowincja Krabi, Widoki ze statku płynącego na trasie Ao Nang - Ko Lanta Yai (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and a lot of envy --Livioandronico2013 20:18, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Prowincja Krabi, Widoki ze statku płynącego na trasie Ao Nang - Ko Lanta Yai (08).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:05, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Singapur, Chinatown, Świątynia Sri Mariamman (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:08, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Hor Samritvimean (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:05, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Prowincja Krabi, Widoki ze statku płynącego na trasie Ao Nang - Ko Lanta Yai (32).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 13:53, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Prowincja Krabi, Widoki ze statku płynącego na trasie Ao Nang - Ko Lanta Yai (30).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 13:56, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Prowincja Krabi, Widoki ze statku płynącego na trasie Ao Nang - Ko Lanta Yai (28).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good -- Spurzem 13:56, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Prowincja Krabi, Widoki ze statku płynącego na trasie Ao Nang - Ko Lanta Yai (09).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 13:58, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Preah Tineang Phhochani (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 13:58, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Prowincja Krabi, Ko Lanta Yai, Plaża Klong Khong (24).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice.--Famberhorst 16:05, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Prowincja Krabi, Ko Lanta Yai, Plaża Klong Khong (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok --Poco a poco 18:15, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Prowincja Krabi, Widoki ze statku płynącego na trasie Ao Nang - Ko Lanta Yai (25).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:24, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Prowincja Krabi, Ko Lanta Yai, Plaża Klong Khong (17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 22:15, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Prowincja Krabi, Widoki ze statku płynącego na trasie Ao Nang - Ko Lanta Yai (31).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 22:15, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Prowincja Krabi, Ko Lanta Yai, Plaża Klong Khong (28).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --PumpkinSky 22:50, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Prowincja Krabi, Ko Lanta Yai, Plaża Klong Khong (22).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 16:32, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Prowincja Krabi, Ko Lanta Yai, Plaża Klong Khong (09).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:13, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Prowincja Krabi, Widoki ze statku płynącego na trasie Ao Nang - Ko Lanta Yai (26).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 16:29, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Prowincja Krabi, Ko Lanta Yai, Lanta Green Garden Resort (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 20:35, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Prowincja Krabi, Ko Lanta Yai, Plaża Klong Khong (29).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:50, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Prowincja Krabi, Widoki ze statku płynącego na trasie Ao Nang - Ko Lanta Yai (27).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:06, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Prowincja Krabi, Ko Lanta Yai, Plaża Klong Khong (25).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Nice. Please check the image. At the beach there is a green lens flare. --XRay 12:06, 20 July 2017 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the hint! New, fixed version uploaded now. Please take a look again. --Halavar 12:14, 20 July 2017 (UTC) Weak  Support IMO OK for a sunset. --XRay 12:43, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Prowincja Krabi, Ko Lanta Yai, Widoki ze statku na Stare Miasto Lanta (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 20:22, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Prowincja Krabi, Ko Lanta Yai, Plaża Klong Khong (20).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:04, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Prowincja Krabi, Widoki ze statku płynącego na trasie Ao Nang - Ko Lanta Yai (24).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:04, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Muzeum Ludobójstwa Tuol Sleng (32).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 10:33, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mandapa of Satra and Tripitaka in the Royal Palace, Phnom Penh. View from S-W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. ~ Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 17:35, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:29, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Prowincja Krabi, Ko Lanta Yai, Molo w Starym Mieście Lanta.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I saw more with my desktop with my laptop cannot see them -> QI --Poco a poco 17:42, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Prowincja Krabi, Ko Ngai (19).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Shankar Raman 16:54, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Hala Tronowa (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice half part of the palace, quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 17:39, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Malowidła przedstawiające sceny z Reamker (41).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:46, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Wat Langka (39).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:04, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Prowincja Krabi, Widoki ze statku płynącego na trasie Ao Nang - Ko Lanta Yai (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Pretty boring, but ok for QI --Poco a poco 18:39, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Wat, Grobla do Angkor Wat (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 14:48, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Wat, Brama Angkor Wat (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 16:14, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Wat, Brama Angkor Wat (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 15:06, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Phnom Penh, Pałac Królewski, Mandapa Satry i Tripitaki (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Slightly dark, could you try light it up a bit? --Basotxerri 17:06, 27 July 2017 (UTC)  Done OK, it's done:) Please take a look again. --Halavar 18:27, 27 July 2017 (UTC) Thank you! Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:30, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Wat, Brama Angkor Wat (24).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 17:24, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Wat, Brama Angkor Wat (43).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 14:33, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Wat, Brama Angkor Wat (40).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:12, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Prowincja Krabi, Ko Lanta Yai, Plaża Klong Khong (23).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice atmosphere! However, there are three issues: a dust spot in the sky and the horizon is tilted. Could you try to remove or reduce the effects of the lens flare on the beach, too? --Basotxerri 14:24, 29 July 2017 (UTC)  Done I couldn't find that dust spot... New, fixed version uploaded. Please take a look again. --Halavar 14:47, 29 July 2017 (UTC) Looks already better now. The spot is rather slight but it's there. I've left a note, I think it's better to remove it. Anyway, this is already good quality. --Basotxerri 15:03, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Angkor, Angkor Wat, Grobla do Angkor Wat (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It seems to me that the image is tilted and leaning in. Could you check it, please? --Basotxerri 14:52, 28 July 2017 (UTC)  Comment I checked it and seems fine to me. Vertical lines are straight. --Halavar 16:20, 28 July 2017 (UTC) Hmmm, I'm not 100% sure. I've left you a note on the image. Maybe I'm wrong? --Basotxerri 14:30, 29 July 2017 (UTC)  Done OK, I did a perspective correction. Hope it's better now:) --Halavar 14:54, 29 July 2017 (UTC) Much better, sorry for insisting. Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:43, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 1 August 2017 (UTC)