User talk:Maksimsokolov/Archive 2
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Quality Image Promotion
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Side portal of Trinity College, Toronto (monochrome version).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
FP Promotion
_in_monochrome.jpg) |
The image File:Windows of the Frost Building (Toronto, Canada) in monochrome.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Windows of the Frost Building (Toronto, Canada) in monochrome.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
- Congratulations! --Aristeas (talk) 07:52, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
- @Aristeas: Thank you a lot Roman once again! Maksim Sokolov (talk). 12:45, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Fragment of the facade of 483 Bay St., Toronto, Canada.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hornblower Niagara Cruise approaching Horseshoe Falls.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
FP Promotion
 |
The image File:Benches at Oakes Garden Theatre, Niagara Falls, Canada.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Benches at Oakes Garden Theatre, Niagara Falls, Canada.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Safe Hands Sculpture at One Bloor (Toronto, Canada).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Queen's Park Entrance of the Royal Ontario Museum (view form inside).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
FP Promotion
 |
The image File:Portal of St. Andrew's Church.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Portal of St. Andrew's Church.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
Lens question (Sigma 100–400)
Hello Maksim,
since years I want to achieve a longer telephoto lens, but most of them (for E-Mount) are very expensive. Now I have seen that you use the Sigma 100-400mm F5-6.3 DG DN OS for some of your newer architectural photos, and the results look very good. My problem with many telephoto lenses (including e.g. the Sony FE 70-200mm F4 G which I have and use) is that often the sharpness clearly drops towards the margins and especially in the corners. That is not a problem for people shooting wildlife, but for architecture photos it can be a real problem, especially when taking “flat” photos (I mean, like this one) in which everything should be in focus, so that a drop of sharpness in the corners would stand out immediately.
My question: Have you by any chance tried the Sigma 100-400mm F5-6.3 DG DN for such “flat” architectural photos, and how satisfied are you with the results? I know that the Sigma is very good in the centre of the frame and I have seen many fine example photos of wildlife etc. taken with it, but I cannot find good examples for “flat” architectural photos taken with that lens. So if you could give me any hints, this would be extremely helpful.
Anyway, best regards and all the best for you,
Roman / --Aristeas (talk) 17:14, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
@Aristeas: Hello Roman! This Sigma 100-400 is a great lens for the price. I am pretty satisfied! In terms of sharpness, it produces great results, I have not noticed significant softening in the borders. The fact is that, with this lens, I have never taken a picture that is completely "flat" - there is always some perspective and I have to flatten the image somewhat in post. This flattening requires some cropping, so the extreme borders are cropped out. This is because usually the objects I photograph with this lens are far from me and usually higher that the camera. But I have several examples, you can analyze: here, here and here. There are many more, but the idea is the same - they are all flattened versions of objects photographed at some angle. This means that the process of perspective correction and cropping could result to misinterpret the performance of the lens in the laboratory setting, when an image is photographed perfectly "flat" (camera direction being strictly perpendicular to to a wall). All the examples I shared with you have been photographed with a tripod, so that will give you an idea about real life capability of the lens. --Maksim Sokolov (talk). 21:50, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
- Hello Maksim, thank you very much for your kind and very helpful answer! Together with your excellent examples it gives me a very good impression of that lens. Unfortunately I must leave now, but next week I will study your example photos in detail and reply to you more again. Until that, have a nice weekend and thank you again – Roman / --Aristeas (talk) 11:24, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
- @Aristeas: Hello Roman, yesterday I went for a walk and remembered our conversation. Saw a facade which was pretty ideal for the "flat" image. So I made this photograph with my Sigma 100-400. This image has very minimal distortion correction and very minimal crop (which I still had to do to align the windows a bit). I didn't have a tripod with me, this image was made hand-held. Just another image for you to have an idea about the real life performance of the lens. --Maksim Sokolov (talk). 14:51, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
- Hello Maksim, thank you very much for the new example! It shows indeed a very consistent resolution, especially for f/6.3 and handheld. So this lens looks really promising! – For a while I have saved money for Sonys own FE 100–400mm GM lens, which has been praised by most reviewers, is indeed very good (and horribly expensive), but neverless still has some loss of resolution towards the borders. Your example photos and your own impression make me confident that the Sigma, while being much cheaper and even a bit more compact, could be almost as good for my use case (the GM has some additional advantages, but maybe I do not need them). I did not want to order a lens just to test (and return) it, as some people do, but encouraged by your impressions I will probably order the lens. Thank you again very much and all the best, Roman / --Aristeas (talk) 16:16, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Trinity College, Toronto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Two Tibetan Dancers at Nathan Phillips Square.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 10 York Street and Ice Towers.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The L Tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Fragment of facade of Number One York Quay.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 6 August 2021 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Toronto Island Ferry.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Twin Doors of the Bloor Street United Church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Toronto skyline as viewed from Ireland Park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Minke whale near Tadoussac.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Minke whale viewed from a cruise ship.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chapel of Tadoussac.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Whale watching cruise near Tadoussac.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lone SUP paddler on Lake Ontario.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Humber Bay at Sunset.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sunset on Lake Ontario.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sunset at Ontario Place.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ontario Place.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Looking up at John P. Robarts Research Library building.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Paddling on Lake Ontario.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Windows of John M Kelly Library (Version 1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Windows of John M Kelly Library (Version 2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Windows of John M Kelly Library (Version 3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Military musicians of 1812 (Reenactors at Fort George, Niagara on the Lake).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Soldier of 1812 (Reenactor at Fort George, Niagara on the Lake).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Marksman of 1812 firing (Reenactor at Fort George, Niagara on the Lake).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Marksman of 1812 (Reenactor at Fort George, Niagara on the Lake).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Evening view from Niagara on the Lake.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Varsity Stadium, Toronto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 700 University Avenue, Toronto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Your photo of the Montreal Observation Wheel
Hello Maksim,
Tomer T has nominated your great photo of the Montreal Observation Wheel on the Featured Pictures Candidates page. Two reviewers have noted that saturation and contrast are very high. I know that you have got your reservations about the FPC discussions etc. (for good reasons, IHMO), but I wanted to ask you to look into this one – not just because of the FP nomination, but because it is so a good image which IMHO could be even more appealing when saturation and contrast were dialed down a bit. That’s my opinion, of course, and I just ask you to take a look at it ;–). If you say that the photo has exactly the look you wanted, then do not change it, fine! It is a very interesting look, of course. Only if you agree that it could also work with less colours and contrast then it would be great if you could give it a try.
All the best, Roman / --Aristeas (talk) 08:46, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
@Tomer T and Aristeas: Thank you Tomer for nominating the image and thank you Roman for your kind suggestion. This image is one of those where I experimented with post-processing to achieve the mood I wanted, even if this contradicted with the established rules. Montreal in Fall is remembered by me as a very saturated and vibrant place. I know that the community at commons will not accept this and therefore I didn't even nominate this image for the quality image. So let it perish, as it rightfully deserves :) The main thing for me is that it contains the mood of Montreal I felt that day, even at the cost of losing the QI and FP status and receiving the harsh critique (which is a very valid critique actually from the point of view of photography post-processing common sense). Once again, thank you for your support! --Maksim Sokolov (talk). 14:02, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Maksimsokolov: Thank you very much for your answer! I understand your point of view and fully respect it! If the day did look and feel this way for you, the photo should not be changed just to please other people ;–). All the best, --Aristeas (talk) 08:33, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
- FYI: I have commented a bit about this (expressing my own point of view, of course) on the Featured Pictures Candidates page. Best, --Aristeas (talk) 08:52, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Robarts Research Library, Toronto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Church of the Redeemer, Toronto, Canada.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Front portal of Trinity College, Toronto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The door of the side portal of the Trinity College, Toronto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Royal Ontario Museum in Fall 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Detail of 1133 Yonge Street, Toronto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Spadina House, Toronto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! One Bloor, Toronto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Fragment of Sharp Centre for Design, Toronto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! St Andrew's Church, Toronto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Upper Canada College.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Nomination to FPC
Hi, just to let you know that I have just nominated one of your photos to FPC. Congratulations for your excellent eye! -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 21:50, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
@Alvesgaspar: Thank you very much Joaquim, I appreciate your kind remark and the nomination! --Maksim Sokolov (talk). 22:45, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sharp Centre for Design in Monochrome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
_in_monochrome.jpg){kind=link}
--QICbot (talk) 06:45, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
FP Promotion
|
The image File:Church of the Redeemer, Toronto, Canada.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Church of the Redeemer, Toronto, Canada.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 777 Bay Street, Toronto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
FP Promotion
|
The image File:Upper Canada College.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Upper Canada College.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Allen Lambert Galleria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Window at 5 Hoskin Ave, Toronto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ted Rogers Statue and the CN Tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Window of Emmanuel College, Toronto (Sepia).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Window of Emmanuel College, Toronto (Version 2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Window of Emmanuel College, Toronto (Version 1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Yonge-Eglinton, Toronto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Abstract pattern on a tree stump.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ontario Legislative Building.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Frost Building Facade.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Whitney Block, Toronto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Fragment of Whitney Block in Toronto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Great Seal of Ontario (on the facade of Queen's Park Legislative Assembly of Ontario).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The Old Vic, Toronto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! View from Victoria University Garden, Toronto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 07:00, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Windows of Havergal College, Toronto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Window of Havergal College, Toronto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ice Sculptor 1 (Cavalcade of Lights 2021, Toronto).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ice Sculptor 2 (Cavalcade of Lights 2021, Toronto).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! North entrance of Ontario Legislative Building.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Three Toronto police officers.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Glass facades in downtown Toronto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Toronto City Hall Ice Rink (Version 2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Toronto City Hall Ice Rink.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Detail of the facade of 438 University Ave, Toronto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ontario Legislative Building, Toronto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Protester at Queen's Park in Toronto (December 4, 2021).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 07:09, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Glass facades in downtown Toronto (in sepia).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 07:07, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! South African War Memorial, Toronto (Fragment of the Top).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The main pod of the CN Tower (with two EdgeWalkers).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 07:14, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Windows of 1 University Avenue, Toronto, Canada.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 07:07, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Fragment of facade of 1867 Yonge Street, Toronto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Fragment of facade of 2300 Yonge Street, Toronto (Version 1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Fragment of facade of 2300 Yonge Street, Toronto (Version 2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 07:14, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Fragment of facade of 1867 Yonge Street, Toronto (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Fragment of facade of 1867 Yonge Street, Toronto (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Happy Holidays!
|
✴ Happy Holidays, Maksimsokolov ✴ | 
|
|
@Aristeas: Thank you a lot Roman! I also wish you a Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays! --Maksim Sokolov (talk). 14:01, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Staircase of the Michael Lee-Chin Crystal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mosaic Ceiling in Royal Ontario Museum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
FP Promotion
|
The image File:Ontario Place.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ontario Place.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Freedom Convoy 2022, Ottawa, February 12 (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Freedom Convoy 2022, Ottawa, February 12 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Freedom Convoy 2022, Ottawa, February 12 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Freedom Convoy 2022, Ottawa, February 12 (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Freedom Convoy 2022, Ottawa, February 12 (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Freedom Convoy 2022, Ottawa, February 12 (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Freedom Convoy 2022, Ottawa, February 12 (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Freedom Convoy 2022, Ottawa, February 12 (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Freedom Convoy 2022, Ottawa, February 12 (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Freedom Convoy 2022, Ottawa, February 12 (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Freedom Convoy 2022, Ottawa, February 12 (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Freedom Convoy 2022, Ottawa, February 12 (52).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Freedom Convoy 2022, February 12 (BW 4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
Thank you (once again)!
Hello Maksim,
thank you very much for your photos of the so-called Freedom Convoy! Personally I do not sympathize with these people or their ideas at all :–(, but it is great to have such good photos of that convoy etc. on Commons! One day historiography will need these pictures.
All the best, --Aristeas (talk) 16:50, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
- @Aristeas: Thank you a lot Roman for your kind words! I went to Ottawa to make pictures and upload them to Commons because these were significant events, the decisive moments, which would be impossible to replicate. I tend to "rank" my own work in terms of its value. There are "easy" photographs, such that I can replicate with no difficulty (architectural elements, for example), and more valuable photographs, which will be difficult or not possible to replicate. This was the first time I had an opportunity to photograph in quite challenging, freezing and fast-changing conditions, trying to capture the spirit of the situation on various levels. I definitely had very good photographic exercise that day. Analyzing my work, I made a lot of conclusions for the future improvement of my technique. Again, thank you for noticing the work! Maksim Sokolov (talk). 17:31, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
- @Maksimsokolov: Thank you for your kind answer, Maksim! Yes, I agree that these documentary photos are very valuable and I really understand that it was difficult to take them (at least I would have a hard time to take such good photos of moving subjects; I am a very slow photographer ;–). The photos are also framed nicely, colours and focus are excellent, so you have done a great job here.
- Personally I have to confess that I admire your abstract architecture photos even more – you have got an excellent eye to discovery beauty even in not-so-beautiful buildings, and while these photos may be easier to take, they have a rare aesthetical quality and are therefore (IMHO) very valuable, too. So please continue with these photos, too ;–). All the best, Roman / --Aristeas (talk) 11:11, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
- @Aristeas: Thank you Roman. I am an omnivorous photographer, and will definitely continue to make photographs of various genre :) --Maksim Sokolov (talk). 14:59, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Windows of 77 Bloor Street West, Toronto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Windows of 1200 Bay Street, Toronto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Windows of MaRS Discovery District, Toronto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Fragment of St. Thomas Aquinas Church, Toronto (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! A window of St. Thomas Aquinas Church, Toronto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
FP Promotion
 |
The image File:John P. Robarts Research Library.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:John P. Robarts Research Library.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! International Pillow Fight Day in Toronto - April 2, 2022 (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! International Pillow Fight Day in Toronto - April 2, 2022 (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|