User talk:Tournasol7/Archive6

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of Our Lady of the Assumption in Belves 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:06, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panoramic view of Conques 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:10, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Peter Abbey of Marcilhac-sur-Cele 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:57, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Festung Marienberg 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 13:56, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Okarito Lagoon 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 08:52, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ranunculus lyallii in Fiordland National Park 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Beautiful image. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:49, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pont de La Guioule-sous-Rodez 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:54, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Saint Faith Abbey of Conques 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Significant drop of sharpness on the right but the church looks still ok --Poco a poco 07:58, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ancien hopital des Anglais 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:54, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Musee Rignault and House of Henri Martin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Good quality. Basotxerri Sun, 29 Apr 2018 07:14:51 GMT

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palais de la Berbie 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Good quality. Basotxerri Sun, 29 Apr 2018 07:08:45 GMT

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Jean Baptiste Church of Noailhac 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:57, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Headframe in former mine La Découverte 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Good quality. Basotxerri Sun, 29 Apr 2018 07:09:38 GMT

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frankoniabrunnen Wurzburg 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Good quality. Halavar Mon, 30 Apr 2018 07:40:24 GMT

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Stephen Church of Beduer 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:51, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Martin Church in Le Massegros 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Good quality. Granada Mon, 30 Apr 2018 07:54:20 GMT

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rigth bank of Lot River in Cahors 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality (but you should rename the image, there is a typo). --Poco a poco 07:51, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Franz Josef Glacier 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Good quality. Halavar Mon, 30 Apr 2018 07:40:24 GMT

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Landscape in Mount Cook National Park 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Poco a poco Tue, 01 May 2018 08:35:00 GMT

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapel of Milandes 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Poco a poco Tue, 01 May 2018 08:35:00 GMT

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Covered market of Albi 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Basotxerri Tue, 01 May 2018 07:44:18 GMT

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maison de l'Annonciation.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI --ArildV 08:32, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Niche in the belfry in Peyrusse-le-Roc.jpg[edit]

Hi Tournasol7,

I just wanted to know if the proposed correction was difficult to undertake, so I've done it by myself. I've uploaded a new version of the image. I could remove the sign using the Spot Removal function in Lightroom, that has been quite easy. Feel free to nominate the image again if you agree with the new version and if you don't like it, simply revert it to the old one.

Best regards,

--Basotxerri (talk) 15:36, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lake Pukaki 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Done as well as it could have been Daniel Case Wed, 02 May 2018 20:42:16 GMT

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Parentignat 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 16:52, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue de la Traverse in Sainte-Eulalie-d'Olt 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 16:03, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pont-Vieux in Espalion 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, but main object is a bit overexposed --Michielverbeek 07:00, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hotel de Ricard 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 18:01, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Livingstone Mountains NZ.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Landscape in Fiordland National Park 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 07:16, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Godley Statue at Cathedral Square.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. XRay Thu, 03 May 2018 07:35:58 GMT

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Peter church in Pomies 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:39, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panoramic view of Brousse-le-Chateau 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 07:59, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church in Pont-de-Salars 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:49, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Regent Road in Dunedin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 04:14, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barren Peak in Fiordland National Park 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:33, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! White Cliffs in Pukearuhe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:11, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Former bishopric in Rodez 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:34, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Lawrence Church of Cruejouls 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:21, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady Church of Decazeville 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:22, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of Valady 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The cars are a bit disturbing, but Good Quality nonetheless. --Cayambe 08:48, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tour de l'Archeveque in Belves.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Not very enthusiastic for the composition (cars) --Moroder 18:10, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lake Wanaka 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:05, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Pierrefiche 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:31, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Covered walkway at Avenue de la Tour in Clairvaux-d'Aveyron 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:08, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hotel du Ravieux 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:08, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Turret of Hotel du Bosc.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The upper part of the tower could have been slightly sharper. But good enough for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:47, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Renaissance hotel in Sainte-Eulalie-d'Olt 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:29, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Niche in the belfry in Peyrusse-le-Roc.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Beynac 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ercé 15:33, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of Our Lady of the Purification of Cassaniouze 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ercé 15:33, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pont Valentre 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ercé 15:33, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Valley of Cleddau River NZ.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Pretty and good for QI but a bit small. How come? -- Ikan Kekek 07:08, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 4 Place de la Mairie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:29, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue Droit and church in Saint-Cirq-Lapopie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:29, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Okarito Lagoon 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality for me. --Milseburg 17:27, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Massif of Mount Crosscut 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:50, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lot River in Cahors 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 07:06, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marienkapelle in Wurzburg 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:47, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Christchurch Tram at Cathedral Square 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 07:02, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Place d'Armes and belfry in Belves 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 07:06, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ahuriri River 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 10:19, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Castelnaud 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:47, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Former bishopric in Rodez 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:47, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Bertholene 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:47, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Martin Church of Mayres 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 07:15, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lake Wakatipu 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 08:14, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cordyline australis 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Would be better with a bit more contrast, I think. --Basotxerri 08:06, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Queen Street in Auckland 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 07:10, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Franz Josef Village NZ 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 14:21, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Freyberg Range 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 14:21, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haast River 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 19:00, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bowen Falls in Fiordland National Park 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Would be better with a bit more contrast. --Basotxerri 16:55, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lake Moeraki 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. -- Ikan Kekek 08:40, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lac de Pont-de-Salars 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:50, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panoramic view of Rodez 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:50, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fox River in West Coast Region 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:04, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Landscape in Mount Cook National Park 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:55, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wurzburg Residence 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:55, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Festung Marienberg 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 18:24, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Earl Mountains NZ 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:06, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kiwi zone board in Okarito.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Peulle 07:03, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sandy Bay NZ 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, nice composition. --GT1976 07:12, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chroicocephalus novaehollandiae in Abel Tasman NP 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:13, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porte des Tours in Domme 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 08:55, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mount Technical 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:31, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chroicocephalus novaehollandiae in Abel Tasman NP 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:31, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Beynac 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 10:48, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porte de la Barbacane in Peyrusse-le-Roc 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 08:58, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Covered market of Albi 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 08:05, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapel of Our Lady of Pity PlR 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 16:57, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stafford Street in Dunedin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 07:57, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Building at 8 rue de la Grand'Côte in Albi 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:43, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint John the Baptist Church of La Malene 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:43, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of Coussergues 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:43, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View on Lot valley from Saint-Cirq-Lapopie 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:43, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Austremoine Church of Issoire 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 09:27, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Saint Faith Abbey of Conques 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:50, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Garden of the Palais de la Berbie 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- George Chernilevsky 07:22, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue Droite in Saint-Cirq-Lapopie 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 09:38, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Valley of Fox River Westland 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Cayambe 08:56, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of Our Lady of the Purification of Cassaniouze 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 10:21, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Building at Place du Forail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:49, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Building at 69 rue Rinaldi in Albi 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Cayambe 08:56, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hollyford River NZ 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Mostly in focus; looks it would be a nice place to kayak --Daniel Case 00:47, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Okarito Lagoon 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:04, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of the church of Saint-Cirq-Lapopie 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --JiriMatejicek 12:44, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Saturnin Church of Agnac 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --JiriMatejicek 12:44, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tarn River in La Malene 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:04, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Antonin Church of Nauviale 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 15:31, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Former monastery church of St. Jacob.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:06, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phormium cookianum in Westland NP 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tsungam 07:54, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chateau de Reghaud 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Rbrechko 09:59, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wetland near Okarito 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Refreshing --Trougnouf 21:30, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint John Baptist of Capdenac, southern exposure.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Franz Josef Glacier 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:14, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Cahors 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:14, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palais de la Berbie 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Cayambe 19:03, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Roch Chapel of Noailhac 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:14, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of the church of Saint-Cirq-Lapopie 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice --Moroder 17:13, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Town hall of Capdenac, northern exposure.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lake Hawea 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Cayambe 18:58, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Town hall of Campagnac in Aveyron, south-western exposure.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Peter in chains Church in Campuac, northern exposure.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lake Wakatipu 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Gray but pretty and good. -- Ikan Kekek 06:52, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 10 Place de la Caze.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:57, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Building at 69 rue Rinaldi in Albi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:57, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Roquelaure 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI imo.--ArildV 08:18, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Cecilia Cathedral of Albi 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Cayambe 08:57, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ranunculus lyallii in Fiordland National Park 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 08:10, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue Jules Guesde 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support OK. --C messier 08:10, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Micheal Church of Decazeville 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Side of the Mount Belle 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Over-exposed snow, but otherwise great quality. QI imo. --ArildV 10:24, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Former town hall of Blaye-les-Mines 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:16, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Former bishopric in Rodez 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 09:13, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint James Chapel of Monesties 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:05, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle Caylaret in Cruejouls.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:05, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lake Wanaka 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- George Chernilevsky 08:08, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:13, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Buildings at Place de la Mairie in Monesties.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 19:10, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of Bertholene 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:15, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Beynac 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 12:33, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint-Roch Church in La Vinzelle 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:07, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Veronica persica in Estaing 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:47, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church in Camboulan 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Looks good for me. --Rbrechko 14:19, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Street in Beynac-et-Cazenac 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:58, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wainui Bay 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:57, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Peter Church of Monesties 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 18:28, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Franz Josef Glacier 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Peulle 08:39, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Museum of Joseph-Vaylet 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:43, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Court of First Instance of Albi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:44, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Salvy Church of Blaye 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:41, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panoramic view of commune of Saint-Saturnin-de-Lenne 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:27, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of the castle of Severac 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Jakubhal 07:45, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frontage on Main River in Wurzburg 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:23, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Milford Sound in Fiordland National Park 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:27, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 08:21, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint John the Baptist Church in La Roque-Valzergues, southern exposure.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mount Technical 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:05, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Building at Place du Groc.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support A more specific cat would be welcome --Poco a poco 10:00, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parish church of Saint-Jean-Baptiste in Espalion 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:00, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Saturnin Church of Agnac 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support QI assuming that the statue is tilted --Poco a poco 10:00, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Headframe in former mine La Découverte 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:05, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint-Fleuret Chapel of Estaing, southern exposition.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Buildings in Marcilhac-sur-Cele 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. I would remove the spot in the sky. --Basotxerri 08:39, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panoramic sunset in Conques 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Excellent! --Basotxerri 08:39, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Building at Place de la Rode in Domme 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 07:11, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Takapou Bay 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:13, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Coulee de lave de Roquelaure 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Sky a little bit grainy. --XRay 05:03, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint John the Baptist Church of La Malene 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:03, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Panoramic view of Conques, view from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chroicocephalus novaehollandiae in Abel Tasman NP 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:37, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Former bishopric in Rodez 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:02, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church in Firmi 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:15, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Cecilia Cathedral of Albi 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support - Good quality, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 08:09, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maison Oustal Caroline.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:15, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pont Valentre 48.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Nice sharpness and view through the archways --Daniel Case 20:41, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tour d'Arles in Caussade, eastern exposure.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sandy Bay NZ 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:49, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of La Malene 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:49, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Saint-Cirq-Lapopie 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 11:53, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Building at 12 rue d'Engueysse in Albi 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good detail photo --Michielverbeek 20:46, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cloister of the Saint Stephen cathedral of Cahors 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:25, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Franz Josef Glacier 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 07:54, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! South entrance to Monesties.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:06, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tarn River in La Malene 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:06, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Cecilia Cathedral of Albi 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Cayambe 09:51, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Jean Baptiste Church of Noailhac 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 11:25, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Valley of Waiho River 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Photo seems somewhat overworked. But good enough for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:59, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 4 Lices de Candeze.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:21, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Covered market of Albi 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:20, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Micheal Church of Decazeville 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Granada 06:13, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Saint-Mayme, south-western exposure.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Freyberg Range 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 07:34, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of Saint-Cirq-Lapopie 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:18, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Leaf of Viburnum lantana, upper surface.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Panoramic sunset in Conques 02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Panoramic sunset in Conques 02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Freyberg Range & Spenser Mts 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:07, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Stephen Church of Montbartier 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:03, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 15:16, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palais de la Berbie 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:07, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Maison des Consuls in Sévérac-le-Château, north-western exposure.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Saturnin Church of Saint-Saturnin-de-Lenne, eastern exposure.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aristotelia serrata in Westland NP 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:03, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rock La Popie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality and nice composition. --ArildV 07:02, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Galinieres 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality (maybe slightly underexposed?) --ArildV 07:23, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint John the Baptist Church of La Malene 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, church in the town or village --Michielverbeek 06:57, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Vincent Church of Palmas 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:03, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Landscape in Mount Cook National Park 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:23, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Street in Larnagol 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:58, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Peter Abbey of Marcilhac-sur-Cele 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:06, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Main in Wurzburg 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:06, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frontage on the left bank of the Lot river in Espalion 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mount Albert Southern Alps NZ.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:48, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Saint-Cirq-Lapopie 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Granada 08:58, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady Church of Decazeville 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Granada 08:58, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church in Firmi 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Granada 08:58, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Turret of Hôtel du Bosc 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. But can you remove the leaves at the top right?--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:43, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of Saint-Mayme 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:49, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of La Malene.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:49, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Landscape in Mount Cook National Park 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bijay chaurasia 08:23, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kea Point Track in Mount Cook National Park 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tsungam 09:15, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! College Laperouse in Albi 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 11:33, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady Church of Decazeville 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 11:33, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of the family Curieres 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 11:33, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Former town hall of the Palmas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:58, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church in La Bessenoits 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality for me --Megatherium 18:14, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gertrude valley in Fiordland National Park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 08:31, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bell tower of the Saint Cecilia Cathedral of Albi 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 21:01, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mansion in Saint-Cirq-Lapopie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 08:31, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Galinieres 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 11:36, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of the church of Saint-Cirq-Lapopie 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 11:53, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wainui Bay 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Smial 14:28, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Barrier Peak in Fiordland National Park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:57, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Beynac 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tsungam 12:13, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phormium cookianum at Knights Point 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:30, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Magdalene Church of Orsonnette 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:14, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Galinieres 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:14, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leaf of Ricinus communis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:14, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porte de la Barbacane in Peyrusse-le-Roc 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:30, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Peter Church of Pierrefiche 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:43, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church in Saint-Martin-de-Lenne 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:43, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of Bertholene 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:46, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rock Island Knights Point 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 08:18, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Cougousse 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 08:20, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statue of the duke Decazes 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI -- DerFussi 08:03, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Vincent Church of Palmas 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 09:57, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Panoramic view of Estaing 02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Panoramic view of Estaing 02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Windows of the southern facade of the building at 1-2 Stary Port Street in Bydgoszcz.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Peter Church of Pierrefiche 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 07:27, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapelle Notre-Dame de Pitie de Sainte-Eulalie-d'Olt 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 07:27, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Cougousse 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 07:27, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Clocher de l'eglise de Jesus-Christ SDJ Rodez.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 07:27, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wurzburg Residence 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 21:14, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Information board at Lewis Pass 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 06:42, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Peter Church of Pierrefiche 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 08:47, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Senezergues 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:02, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of the Nativity of the Virgin Mary of Cenac 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:02, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Vincent Church of Palmas 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 21:01, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rosa 'Sheila's Perfume' 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 17:36, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pont Valentre 33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, but photo might be much better earlier in the year. --Michielverbeek 15:32, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Former bishopric in Rodez 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:05, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Southern exposure of the building at 15 Jagiellońska Street in Bydgoszcz.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sandy Bay NZ 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 07:15, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church in Saint-Martin-de-Lenne 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 07:15, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pont-Vieux in Espalion 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, but I would remove the birds in the sky --Llez 10:36, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Freyberg Range & Spenser Mts 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 07:41, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ruisseau d'Audiernes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 07:41, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Peter Church of Pierrefiche 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:19, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cloister of the Saint Stephen cathedral of Cahors 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 06:55, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of the castle of Fayrac and Beynac.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --GT1976 06:55, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Totaranui Beach 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 14:37, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tombeau du Roy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Magnifique! Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 14:44, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue d'Aubuly 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 14:44, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Pierrefiche 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 14:44, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hotel de Ricard 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 14:44, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pont Valentre 44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 07:05, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hotel du Ravieux 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:10, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porte de la Barbacane in Peyrusse-le-Roc 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:10, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Valley of Waiho River 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tsungam 08:00, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La Roque-Gageac 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:44, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Patrick Cathedral in Auckland 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 07:51, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pont Valentre 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice, although some more contrast would be better. -- MJJR 07:47, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Astelia nivicola in Lewis Pass Scenic Reserve 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:57, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porte de Candeze.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok --Uoaei1 20:08, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2 Rue du Fort in Belves.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok --Uoaei1 20:08, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marienkapelle in Wurzburg 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Nice --Moroder 15:44, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Mayrinhac-Lentour.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:40, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Martin Church of Lunan 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:03, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Okarito Lagoon 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:13, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]