Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:SM Mall of Asia: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Browse history interactively
← Older editNewer edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Deleted: there is no FOP in the Philippines.
Line 1: Line 1:
{{delh}}

=== Files in [[:Category:SM Mall of Asia]] ===
=== Files in [[:Category:SM Mall of Asia]] ===


Line 90: Line 90:


<noinclude>[[Category:Philippine FOP cases/pending]]</noinclude>
<noinclude>[[Category:Philippine FOP cases/pending]]</noinclude>
----
'''Deleted:''' there is no FOP in the Philippines. [[User talk:Fastily|<span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS;color:Indigo;font-weight:bold"><big>F</big><small>ASTILY</small></span>]] 20:36, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
{{delf}}

Revision as of 20:36, 4 July 2014

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:SM Mall of Asia

Per COM:FOP#Philippines.

Stefan4 (talk) 19:37, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. Wrong interpretation of copyright law, IMO. "The law is silent on the matter", therefore it can equally be presumed to be permissible. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:40, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That's not correct. The law protects all uses of a work, unless an exception is explicitly given in the law. No such exception is given in the law. --Stefan4 (talk) 17:00, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep. There is no Philippine precedent declaring such photography as an infringement especially if it's done in fair use (Sec.184 Limitations). This mall is a major landmark in Manila and is heavily photographed and published in many websites and media including that of the Philippine Department of Tourism (www.tourism.gov.ph). --RioHondo (talk) 10:17, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Please provide evidence that freedom of panorama exists in the Philippines. COM:FOP#Philippines says that there is no freedom of panorama in the Philippines, and the standard practice is to delete images of recent buildings from the Philippines. See Category:Philippine FOP cases/deleted for examples of other pictures of buildings in the Philippines which have been deleted. --Stefan4 (talk) 14:46, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I think the conclusion at COM:FOP#Philippines is wrong. The law needs to explicitly state that FOP does not exist. Moreover, section 184.1 (c) and (d) of the Copyright Law do permit use for information and reporting purposes. -- P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:37, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
That's not correct. A copyright law explicitly needs to state that an exception exists. Otherwise, the exception doesn't exist. Also, an exception which only allows you to use images for "information and reporting purposes" fails COM:FU. --Stefan4 (talk) 11:29, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: there is no FOP in the Philippines. FASTILY 20:36, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:SM_Mall_of_Asia&oldid=128153780"