Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Phipps Conservatory winter 2015 Broderie Room.jpg: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
Daniel Case (talk | contribs) →File:Phipps Conservatory winter 2015 Broderie Room.jpg: um, it's not that simple |
||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
::* Actually, US copyright law expressly allow interior photos of publicly accessible buildings, which is defined to also specifically include "garden pavillions". As for the Christmas decorations, I think they are arguably part of the building and ''de minimis'' anyway, but I will have to check to make sure. It's not like the photo is zoomed in on a single star or anything like that. [[user:dllu|dllu]] [[User_talk:dllu|(t]],[[Special:Contributions/Dllu|c)]] 02:23, 26 November 2015 (UTC) |
::* Actually, US copyright law expressly allow interior photos of publicly accessible buildings, which is defined to also specifically include "garden pavillions". As for the Christmas decorations, I think they are arguably part of the building and ''de minimis'' anyway, but I will have to check to make sure. It's not like the photo is zoomed in on a single star or anything like that. [[user:dllu|dllu]] [[User_talk:dllu|(t]],[[Special:Contributions/Dllu|c)]] 02:23, 26 November 2015 (UTC) |
||
*{{s}} --[[User:Code|Code]] ([[User talk:Code|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 16:50, 25 November 2015 (UTC) |
*{{s}} --[[User:Code|Code]] ([[User talk:Code|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 16:50, 25 November 2015 (UTC) |
||
:::: The interior wasn't the problem. The Christmas display, which ''cannot'' be considered ''de minimis'' in this image, is. It is ''artwork''; it does not matter what the medium is. And per [[COM:FOP#United States]]: "''For artworks, even if permanently installed in public places, the U.S. copyright law has no similar exception, and any publication of an image of a copyrighted artwork thus is subject to the approval of the copyright holder of the artwork.''" To be fair, the problem isn't just this image—it's [[:Category:Christmas lights in the United States|''every'' image of Christmas lights we have in the US]] save those on federal government buildings. [[User:Daniel Case|Daniel Case]] ([[User talk:Daniel Case|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 06:34, 26 November 2015 (UTC) |
|||
*{{s}} Ho Ho Ho! <font style="color:green">😄 [[User:ArionEstar|<small>'''''A'''</small><big>rion'''</big><small>E</small><big>'''star</big>'']] 😜 </font>([[User talk:ArionEstar|<font style="color:green">talk]])</font> 17:13, 25 November 2015 (UTC) |
*{{s}} Ho Ho Ho! <font style="color:green">😄 [[User:ArionEstar|<small>'''''A'''</small><big>rion'''</big><small>E</small><big>'''star</big>'']] 😜 </font>([[User talk:ArionEstar|<font style="color:green">talk]])</font> 17:13, 25 November 2015 (UTC) |
||
* Weak {{s}} Good, but the partially visible star at the top is a little bit disturbing. The star should be complete. --<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:XRay|XRay]]</span> <sup>[[User_talk:XRay|talk]]</sup> 20:09, 25 November 2015 (UTC) |
* Weak {{s}} Good, but the partially visible star at the top is a little bit disturbing. The star should be complete. --<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:XRay|XRay]]</span> <sup>[[User_talk:XRay|talk]]</sup> 20:09, 25 November 2015 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 06:34, 26 November 2015
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Dec 2015 at 22:46:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
Info created by dllu - uploaded by dllu - nominated by Dllu -- dllu (t,c) 22:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Support -- dllu (t,c) 22:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)- Support very fine and yes, moody! --Hubertl 01:46, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
- Support Coming up Christmas. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 04:14, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 10:56, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
- Support -- Yann (talk) 10:58, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Tremonist (talk) 14:59, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
- Are we sure that this image can be free? To me it qualifies as a three-dimensional public artwork—and thus does not come under the FoP provisions of US law. Daniel Case (talk) 15:59, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
- I will contact the Phipps Conservatory to make sure we have permission. Thanks for bringing this up. dllu (t,c) 01:59, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
- Actually, US copyright law expressly allow interior photos of publicly accessible buildings, which is defined to also specifically include "garden pavillions". As for the Christmas decorations, I think they are arguably part of the building and de minimis anyway, but I will have to check to make sure. It's not like the photo is zoomed in on a single star or anything like that. dllu (t,c) 02:23, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Code (talk) 16:50, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
- The interior wasn't the problem. The Christmas display, which cannot be considered de minimis in this image, is. It is artwork; it does not matter what the medium is. And per COM:FOP#United States: "For artworks, even if permanently installed in public places, the U.S. copyright law has no similar exception, and any publication of an image of a copyrighted artwork thus is subject to the approval of the copyright holder of the artwork." To be fair, the problem isn't just this image—it's every image of Christmas lights we have in the US save those on federal government buildings. Daniel Case (talk) 06:34, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
- Support Ho Ho Ho! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 17:13, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
- Weak Support Good, but the partially visible star at the top is a little bit disturbing. The star should be complete. --XRay talk 20:09, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
